Greedfall

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER form a high-end pairing for Greedfall, a 2019 Action RPG. The benchmark data shows this combination achieves very high frame rates across all tested settings, with the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s substantial rasterization power ensuring that even the most demanding presets remain fluid. The measured results place this combo in the top tier of tested systems for this title.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. In Greedfall, which is an open-world RPG with numerous NPCs and dynamic environments, the CPU’s role is primarily to manage game logic, physics, and draw calls. The data indicates that this processor is more than adequate for the task, as the frame rates at lower resolutions suggest the system is not CPU-limited in any meaningful way.

The processor’s benchmark scores reinforce its capability. In Cinebench R23, it scores 50009 points in multi-core and 7060 in single-core tests. This places it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Core i9-14900KF, the 265K trails by only 0.2% in average benchmark score, while it is 0.9% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K. These are marginal differences that would not manifest as perceptible performance variations in gaming. The CPU’s 30 MB of shared L3 cache and DDR5 memory support contribute to its ability to feed the GPU efficiently, though the exact impact on Greedfall’s frame pacing is not directly measured.

What the data shows is a balanced platform where the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo reaches 316.8 FPS, a figure that is far beyond the refresh rate of most displays. This high ceiling indicates that the CPU can sustain the frame output demanded by the GPU even in less graphically intensive scenarios. As settings increase to Ultra at 1080p, the frame rate drops to 146.5 FPS, which is still exceptionally high and confirms that the workload is transitioning to the GPU as the primary limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: How does this CPU compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores an average of 79102 across all benchmark tests. It is 0.2% behind both the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which score 79240 and 79245 respectively. It is also 0.9% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K, which scores 79824.

Q: What is the peak average frame rate measured for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 316.8 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is followed by 251 FPS at the same resolution with Medium settings.

Q: What is the lowest average frame rate measured for this combo?

A: The lowest average frame rate is 58.8 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. This is the only measured configuration that dips below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Does the GPU outperform its nearest rival in the database?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 53610. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, which scores 53489, and 2.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, which scores 52086.

Q: How many total combinations does this system rank against in Greedfall?

A: The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 120th out of 1705 tested combos for this game. This places it in the top 7% of all systems tested.

Q: Is the frame rate at 4K Ultra playable?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the measured average frame rate is 58.8 FPS. This is technically playable but sits just below the 60 FPS standard often considered the baseline for smooth performance, so users may prefer to lower settings for a more consistent experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination ranks 120th out of 1705 tested combos in Greedfall. This top-tier placement is expected given the hardware involved. The GPU alone sits in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, and the CPU is in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. The combination of these two high-performing components ensures that the system is well above average for this specific title.

In practical terms, this rank means that the vast majority of other hardware configurations tested will produce lower frame rates. The data shows that the system is not just capable of high frame rates but does so consistently across the board. For instance, the 1080p High result of 223.6 FPS is a strong indicator of headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. The 4K High result of 92.4 FPS is particularly impressive, showing that the combo can handle demanding resolutions without sacrificing the High preset. The ranking confirms the balance between the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance and the GPU’s high compute throughput, which together deliver a smooth experience in Greedfall.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system produces exceptionally high frame rates. With Low settings, the average is 316.8 FPS. Moving to Medium yields 251 FPS, and High produces 223.6 FPS. The most demanding preset at this resolution, Ultra, still achieves a very high 146.5 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is overwhelmingly GPU-bound, with the CPU able to maintain frame rates well above what most users would need.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain robust. Low settings produce an average of 219.6 FPS, and Medium settings follow at 173 FPS. The High preset delivers 156.2 FPS, which is a significant drop from the 1080p High result but still exceptionally smooth. The Ultra preset at 1440p yields 99 FPS, which is nearly double the 4K Ultra result and indicates that the GPU is still managing the load effectively.

At 3840x2160, the performance scales down as expected. Low settings produce 131.1 FPS, which is a substantial figure for 4K. Medium settings yield 101.2 FPS, and High settings produce 92.4 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 58.8 FPS, which is the only configuration below 60 FPS. This shows that the RTX 4080 SUPER is capable of handling 4K gaming, but the Ultra preset pushes it to its limits in this title. The progression from Low to Ultra at each resolution shows a consistent performance cost for each step up in visual fidelity.

Resolution Scaling

The data reveals a clear pattern in how performance scales from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 223.6 FPS at 1920x1080 to 156.2 FPS at 2560x1440, which is a reduction of 30.1%. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the frame rate drops further to 92.4 FPS, another 40.8% reduction. The total scaling from 1080p to 4K at High settings is a 58.7% decrease in frame rate, which is consistent with the increase in pixel count.

At Low settings, the scaling is more pronounced. The system starts at 316.8 FPS at 1080p, drops to 219.6 FPS at 1440p (a 30.7% reduction), and then falls to 131.1 FPS at 4K (a 40.3% reduction from 1440p). The total decrease from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is 58.6%. This consistency across settings suggests that the limiting component scales uniformly with resolution, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario.

The Ultra settings show a similar trend. From 146.5 FPS at 1080p, the frame rate drops to 99 FPS at 1440p (32.4% reduction) and then to 58.8 FPS at 4K (40.6% reduction). The total reduction is 59.9%. These consistent scaling percentages indicate that the performance bottleneck shifts almost entirely to the GPU as resolution increases. The CPU’s performance is sufficient to avoid introducing a bottleneck at any resolution, as the frame rate drops are directly proportional to the pixel throughput demands.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 1080p monitor, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation, as it delivers 146.5 FPS. This provides a highly responsive experience that exceeds the refresh rate of most 1080p displays, which typically cap at 144Hz or 165Hz. There is no need to compromise on visual fidelity at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset leaves ample performance headroom.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers 99 FPS, which is suitable for a 100Hz or 120Hz monitor. However, for those with a 144Hz display, the High preset at 156.2 FPS is the better choice. This preset maintains a high frame rate that is more likely to be capped by the monitor’s refresh rate, providing a smooth experience. The Medium preset at 173 FPS offers even more headroom, but the visual quality trade-off may not be worth it given that High already exceeds the refresh rate of most 1440p displays.

At 3840x2160, the recommendation is more nuanced. The High preset produces 92.4 FPS, which is excellent for 4K gaming and provides a fluid experience on most 60Hz or 120Hz displays. The Medium preset yields 101.2 FPS, which is slightly higher but may not offer a noticeable improvement in smoothness. The Ultra preset, at 58.8 FPS, is best avoided for those who are sensitive to frame rate dips below 60 FPS. For a 4K display with a 60Hz refresh rate, the High preset is the best balance, as it stays comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold while providing high visual quality. The Low preset at 131.1 FPS is excessive for most 4K monitors, so it is only recommended for competitive play where maximum frame rate is prioritized over visuals.