Greedfall

Greedfall is a 2019 Action RPG that, on paper, does not demand the latest hardware, but the measured frame rates for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination reveal a wide performance envelope across settings and resolutions. The data shows a system capable of handling the game at high refresh rates at 1080p, while also being pushed to its limits at 4K Ultra. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to explain the role of each component, the best settings for different display targets, and how this specific combo ranks against others in the database.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. In the context of a game like Greedfall, which is not heavily multithreaded, the CPU's high single-core performance is more relevant than its raw core count. The benchmark results for the processor support this, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7060 and a multi-core score of 50009, showing a strong balance but with the single-core headroom that gaming often relies on. The processor’s percentile ranking of 97 among all CPUs indicates that its overall compute capability is near the top of the database, which helps ensure it is not a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

Given the measured FPS data, the CPU's role appears to be one of providing a stable foundation. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches 267.8 FPS, a frame rate that is exceptionally high and suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to avoid a significant performance ceiling. The high boost clock of 5.50 GHz is the likely contributor to this, as it allows for rapid single-threaded execution, which is typical for game logic and draw calls. While the 20 cores and 30 MB of shared L3 cache are impressive specifications, the data suggests that for this specific title, the single-threaded performance is the primary driver of the high frame rates seen at lower graphical loads.

When the graphical settings are increased to Ultra, the average FPS drops significantly across all resolutions, but the pattern remains consistent. The CPU's performance is likely sufficient to maintain frame rates above 120 FPS in the best-case scenarios, but as the GPU load increases, the limiting factor shifts. The data does not show a scenario where the CPU is clearly the primary bottleneck, as even at 1080p Ultra, the system achieves 123.3 FPS, a number that is still well above the 60 FPS standard. This indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K provides ample processing power for Greedfall, allowing the GPU to be the deciding factor in performance scaling.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data for this combo provides a clear picture of how the game scales with settings, and the optimal choice depends heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 1920x1080 display, the data shows that even the most demanding preset is playable. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 123.3 FPS, which is more than sufficient for a smooth experience on a standard 60Hz monitor and is also suitable for high-refresh-rate displays up to 120Hz. However, the High preset at 190.9 FPS and the Medium preset at 212.2 FPS offer significantly higher headroom, which would be beneficial for 144Hz or 240Hz displays, with the Low preset reaching 267.8 FPS for maximum competitive fluidity.

At 2560x1440, the choices become more nuanced. The Ultra preset produces an average of 87.6 FPS, which is playable but may not be ideal for very high refresh rate gaming. The High preset, at 130.8 FPS, presents a strong balance between visual fidelity and performance, making it the recommended setting for most users at this resolution. The Medium preset at 145.1 FPS is also a viable option for those prioritizing frame rate over some visual details, while the Low preset at 183.5 FPS is available for the highest possible performance. For 4K (3840x2160), the data indicates that the Ultra preset is not a good choice, as it yields an average of only 49.9 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.

The best experience at 4K is achieved with the High preset, which delivers 81.6 FPS, a solid number that balances quality and smoothness. The Medium preset at 84.9 FPS is nearly identical in performance and could be used if it offers a more stable experience. The Low preset at 4K, at 110.7 FPS, is an option for those who absolutely require high refresh rates even at this resolution, but the visual sacrifices would be significant. In summary, the data suggests that for this combo, the High preset is the most versatile recommendation, providing excellent performance at 1080p and 1440p, and being the only preset that achieves a comfortable frame rate at 4K.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT capable of running Greedfall at 4K with high settings?

A: Yes, the measured data shows that at 3840x2160 with the High preset, the combo achieves an average of 81.6 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth play.

Q: What is the performance difference between the High and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset produces an average of 130.8 FPS, while the Ultra preset produces 87.6 FPS. This represents a significant performance cost for the increased visual fidelity of the Ultra preset.

Q: Can this system achieve 240 FPS in Greedfall?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080 with the Low preset, which yields an average of 267.8 FPS. At the Medium preset, it reaches 212.2 FPS, which is close but not quite 240 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K compare to its closest rival in terms of overall benchmark score?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 79102, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and the Intel Core i9-14900KF, and 0.9% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900K.

Q: Is the Ultra preset at 4K playable with this hardware combination?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the average FPS is 49.9. This is below the 60 FPS standard and would likely result in a less smooth experience, so it is not recommended.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile compared to all other GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a percentile ranking of 82, meaning it performs better than 82% of all GPUs in the database based on its average benchmark score.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ranked 368th out of 1705 tested combos in the database for Greedfall. This places the combo in the top 22% of all tested systems, which is a strong result given the game's age and the high performance of the components. The rank reflects the system's ability to deliver very high frame rates at mainstream resolutions, as indicated by the measured data, while also being capable of handling 4K at more reasonable settings.

The high CPU percentile (97) and GPU percentile (82) both contribute to this ranking. The CPU's score is notably close to its nearest rivals, with a deltaPct of only -0.2% compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Core i9-14900KF, and -0.9% compared to the Intel Core i9-14900K. This indicates that the processor is performing as expected for its tier. The GPU, while having a lower percentile, still holds its own, with its average benchmark score of 38358 being virtually identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (deltaPct of 0%) and only 0.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile.

This ranking suggests that the combo is well-balanced, with neither component being a significant weak point. The fact that it ranks in the top quarter of all combos, despite Greedfall being a title that is not particularly demanding by modern standards, indicates that this hardware is more than sufficient for a superior gaming experience in this title. The measured FPS data confirms this, showing that the system can often push frame rates beyond the refresh rate capabilities of most monitors at 1080p and 1440p.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This large memory capacity and high bandwidth are crucial for handling high-resolution textures and complex scenes without performance degradation. The GPU's boost clock is listed at 2394 MHz, with a game clock of 2025 MHz, and its performance is reflected in its average benchmark score of 38358. The GPU's role in Greedfall is directly tied to the settings and resolution, as the measured FPS data shows a clear scaling pattern.

At 1920x1080, the GPU is not the primary bottleneck, as even the Ultra preset achieves 123.3 FPS. The GPU's raw compute power, with an FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS, is more than enough for this resolution. The difference between the Low preset (267.8 FPS) and the Ultra preset (123.3 FPS) at 1080p highlights the impact of the increased graphical load, likely from more complex shading and effects. As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU's workload increases, and the Ultra preset drops to 87.6 FPS, while the High preset remains fluid at 130.8 FPS.

The most telling data is at 3840x2160, where the GPU's capabilities are truly tested. The Ultra preset falls to 49.9 FPS, indicating that the combination of 4K resolution and maxed-out settings is too demanding for this GPU to maintain a smooth frame rate. However, the High preset at 81.6 FPS shows that the GPU is still very capable at 4K when settings are adjusted. The 20 GB of VRAM is likely sufficient for all presets, as Greedfall is not known for being excessively demanding on memory, and the data does not show any anomalies that would suggest a VRAM limitation, such as a sudden performance drop at higher settings that would indicate memory swapping.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptionally high frame rates. The Low preset achieves an average of 267.8 FPS, which is the highest measured value in the dataset. The Medium preset follows at 212.2 FPS, and the High preset at 190.9 FPS. The Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still produces a very respectable 123.3 FPS. This resolution shows a clear step-down in performance as settings are increased, but all presets are perfectly playable.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show more variation. The Low preset delivers 183.5 FPS, a significant drop from the 1080p Low result but still very high. The Medium preset achieves 145.1 FPS, and the High preset reaches 130.8 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 87.6 FPS, marking the first time in the data that a preset falls below the 100 FPS mark. The performance scaling between presets at this resolution is consistent, with a clear gap between the Low/Medium/High presets and the Ultra preset.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a substantial hit across the board. The Low preset yields 110.7 FPS, which is still a good result for 4K. The High preset provides 81.6 FPS, and the Medium preset is close behind at 84.9 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, falls to 49.9 FPS, which is the only measured result below 60 FPS. This data clearly shows that the Ultra preset at 4K is not viable for a smooth experience, while the other presets offer varying degrees of playability. The differences between Medium and High at 4K are minimal (84.9 vs 81.6 FPS), suggesting that the High preset offers a better visual return for a similar performance cost.