Greedfall

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a solid, if not spectacular, showing in Greedfall, landing in the 53rd percentile of all tested system configurations. The pairing of a high-end 20-core processor with a mid-range 8 GB graphics card produces a balanced profile, though the data reveals that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions and graphical presets. The measured FPS figures indicate that this system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it comfortably exceeds playable thresholds, while 4K remains a challenge unless settings are dialed back.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combination in Greedfall?*

A: The combo ranks 1555th out of 2938 tested configurations, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all systems benchmarked for this game.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The CPU is nearly identical in performance to the AMD EPYC 4464P, with an average benchmark score difference of only -0.3%. It also leads the AMD EPYC 7343 by a margin of 0.7% and the AMD EPYC 9124 by -0.7%.

Q: What is the best resolution for achieving a 60 FPS average on High settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the system achieves an average of 89 FPS, indicating that this resolution is well within its capabilities for a smooth experience. The 3840x2160 High preset only manages 53 FPS, which falls short of a 60 FPS target.

Q: Which graphical preset provides the highest frame rate at 1920x1080?

A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 yields the highest average frame rate of 180 FPS. This is significantly higher than the Ultra preset, which drops to 82 FPS at the same resolution.

*Q: Is the RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Greedfall at 4K Ultra settings?*

A: The data shows the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 produces an average of only 34 FPS, which suggests that the combination of high resolution and maximum settings heavily taxes the system, and the frame rate dips below a playable threshold.

Q: How does the GPU's synthetic benchmark score translate to its in-game performance?

A: The RTX 4060's average benchmark score of 17639 places it just 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M in synthetic tests. In Greedfall, this translates to a capable 1080p performer that can handle High settings at 128 FPS but struggles to maintain 60 FPS at 4K on the same preset.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is the primary driver of Greedfall's visuals, and its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth proves to be a significant factor in the measured frame rates. The data shows a clear pattern: as resolution and settings increase, the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth become limiting factors. At 1920x1080, the card is not stressed, delivering 128 FPS on High and 180 FPS on Low. However, the transition to 2560x1440 shows a predictable performance drop, with the High preset falling to 89 FPS.

The most telling evidence of the GPU's limitations comes at 3840x2160. Here, the High preset's average of 53 FPS falls below the desired 60 FPS threshold, while the Ultra preset plummets to an average of 34 FPS. This sharp decline at 4K suggests that the 8 GB VRAM buffer is being saturated, forcing the system to handle data less efficiently. The card's boost clock of 2460 MHz and 3072 shading units are sufficient for lower resolutions, but they cannot compensate for the memory constraints at higher pixel counts. The RTX 4060's 115 W TDP and dual-slot design also indicate that this is a power-efficient part, yet its performance ceiling in Greedfall is clearly defined by its memory subsystem rather than its compute capabilities.

Synthetic benchmarks corroborate this in-game behavior. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 19545 puts it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 reflects a mid-range DirectX 12 performer. The data indicates that the RTX 4060 is a well-balanced card for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, but pushing it to 4K with high-fidelity settings results in a compromised experience. The closest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, has a nearly identical average score with a delta of -0.2%, yet the RTX 4060's modern architecture and driver support give it a clear edge in Greedfall's specific workloads.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 provides the computational backbone for this system, and its 20 cores and 20 threads are more than sufficient for Greedfall's demands. With a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, the processor can handle both single-threaded game logic and multi-threaded background tasks without becoming a bottleneck. The synthetic benchmark data supports this: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 and a single-core score of 5960 place the CPU in the 93rd percentile of all processors, indicating exceptional headroom for gaming workloads.

In Greedfall, the CPU's role is less critical than the GPU's, as evidenced by the FPS scaling across resolutions. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system reaches 180 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's maximum frame output for this game. However, as the resolution increases, the frame rate drops in a pattern that aligns with GPU load rather than CPU limitation. The processor's 30 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth ensure that data can be fed to the GPU quickly, but the game's engine does not appear to be heavily CPU-bound.

The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are all server-class EPYC processors, which underscores its high multi-threaded performance. However, for gaming, the single-core performance is more relevant, and the Cinebench R20 single-core score of 884 indicates strong per-thread capability. The 65 W TDP and 3 nm process node from TSMC also mean that the processor runs efficiently, leaving thermal headroom for the GPU to operate without interference. In this configuration, the Core Ultra 7 265 is never the limiting factor; its job is to keep the RTX 4060 fed, and it does so admirably across all tested settings.

How This Combo Ranks

With a rank of 1555 out of 2938 combos, this system sits just above the median for Greedfall performance. The 53rd percentile ranking suggests that while this is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it outperforms a slight majority of all tested configurations. The data indicates that the combination of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU is a common and effective pairing, as the CPU's strength ensures that the GPU is the sole determinant of frame rate at higher resolutions.

The ranking is influenced heavily by the GPU's performance at 4K, where the combo falls behind systems featuring more powerful graphics cards. However, the strong CPU prevents the system from being dragged down by processor-intensive scenes, which is why the overall rank remains near the middle. The deltaPct values for the CPU's rivals are all within ±0.7%, meaning that swapping to a different processor would likely result in a negligible change in rank. Conversely, the GPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon 780M with a 0.3% delta, are integrated graphics, highlighting that the RTX 4060 is a significant step up in discrete performance.

For a user targeting 1080p or 1440p, this rank understates the system's actual capability, as it is in the top tier of performers at those resolutions. The 4K Ultra data point, with its 34 FPS average, is what drags the overall rank down. This suggests that the combo is well-optimized for mainstream gaming but not for 4K enthusiasts. The measured FPS data is the most reliable indicator, and it shows that the system delivers a smooth experience in the resolutions where it is most likely to be used.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal experience is achieved by prioritizing resolution over ultra-high settings. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 128 FPS, which is an excellent balance of visual fidelity and smoothness. The Medium preset offers a modest increase to 141 FPS, but the jump from Medium to High is worth the slight frame rate cost for better visuals. The Ultra preset at 1080p drops to 82 FPS, which is still playable but does not provide a proportional visual improvement over High.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the clear recommendation, with an average of 89 FPS that clears the 60 FPS threshold with room to spare. The Medium preset at 98 FPS is also viable, but High offers a better visual experience for a relatively small performance hit. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls to 57 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay and is not recommended for users who prioritize frame rate consistency.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates on higher presets. The Low preset at 74 FPS is the only 4K option that clears 60 FPS, but it sacrifices significant visual quality. The High preset at 53 FPS and Medium at 58 FPS are playable but may exhibit stutter on fast-moving scenes. The Ultra preset at 34 FPS is not recommended for serious gameplay. For 4K, users should either accept Low settings or drop to 1440p to use High settings for a better overall experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the system shows its limitations. The Low preset achieves an average of 74 FPS, while Medium drops to 58 FPS with a minimum of 50 FPS and a maximum of 67 FPS. High settings yield an average of 53 FPS, and Ultra falls to 34 FPS. The data reveals a steep performance cliff between Medium and Ultra, suggesting that the 8 GB VRAM is overwhelmed at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates are more respectable. Low settings produce an average of 125 FPS, Medium reaches 98 FPS with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 113 FPS, and High delivers 89 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 57 FPS, which is just under the 60 FPS target. The gap between Low and High is 36 FPS, indicating that the GPU has enough headroom for quality adjustments at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the system performs at its best. Low settings hit an average of 180 FPS, Medium reaches 141 FPS with a minimum of 120 FPS and a maximum of 163 FPS, and High achieves 128 FPS. Ultra settings still manage a respectable 82 FPS. The frame rate scaling is consistent, with each preset tier providing a meaningful performance step, confirming that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo. The minimum FPS values for Medium at all resolutions show that the system maintains stable frame times, with the 1080p Medium min of 120 FPS being particularly strong.