Greedfall

Greedfall, the 2019 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for mobile hardware, and the pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with the AMD Radeon 880M integrated graphics produces a predictable, GPU-bound experience. The measured frame rates across resolutions and settings reveal a component stack where the integrated GPU is consistently the limiting factor, with the CPU's substantial core count and high boost clocks remaining largely underutilized. This analysis breaks down the measured performance data to explain how this combo behaves, where it stands, and what settings provide the most playable experience.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows a steep performance cliff as resolution increases, which is the classic signature of a system constrained by its graphics processor. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings results in a drop from 51 FPS to 35 FPS, a 31% reduction in frame rate. The jump to 3840x2160 is even more punishing, with the average FPS falling to 21, representing a 59% loss compared to the 1080p result. This scaling pattern is non-linear and severe, indicating that the AMD Radeon 880M's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth are being saturated well before the CPU becomes a bottleneck.

The trend is consistent across all quality presets. At Low settings, the frame rate falls from 71 FPS at 1080p to 49 FPS at 1440p (a 31% drop) and then to 29 FPS at 4K (a 59% drop from 1080p). At Medium settings, the progression is 56 FPS to 39 FPS to 23 FPS, with the 4K result showing a minimum of 20 FPS and a maximum of 26 FPS. The consistency of this ~30% penalty for each resolution step up strongly suggests that the limiting component is the GPU's fillrate and shading capacity, as the workload scales directly with the number of pixels rendered. The CPU, with its 16 cores and 22 threads, is not showing signs of strain at any resolution, as the frame rate is entirely dictated by how quickly the Radeon 880M can process frames.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Greedfall at a smooth 60 FPS at any resolution?

A: No. The measured data shows the highest average frame rate is 71 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At High settings, the best result is 51 FPS at 1080p, which falls short of a 60 FPS target. At higher resolutions, the frame rates are significantly lower, with 4K High producing only 21 FPS.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The gap is substantial. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 71 FPS, while the Ultra preset manages only 32 FPS. This represents a 55% reduction in frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest quality preset.

Q: How does the 4K Ultra setting perform?

A: It is effectively unplayable. The average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 13 FPS. This is a slideshow-level performance and indicates that this resolution and preset combination is far beyond the capabilities of the integrated graphics.

Q: Is the 2560x1440 Medium preset a viable option?

A: It provides a playable, albeit not perfectly smooth, experience. The average frame rate is 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 44 FPS. This is playable for a slow-paced Action RPG, but it will not feel fluid during combat.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H bottleneck the AMD Radeon 880M in this game?

A: The data indicates the opposite. The frame rates scale directly with resolution and settings, which is a clear sign of a GPU bottleneck. The CPU's high multithreaded benchmark scores, such as 15028 in Cinebench R23, suggest it has ample headroom, and the consistent FPS drops with increased pixel count confirm the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo achieves near-smooth performance. At 1080p, even High settings (51 FPS) are more playable than the best result at 1440p (49 FPS at Low). The 1080p resolution is the sweet spot for this hardware.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its benchmark results are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15028 and a Passmark multithread score of 24873, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. In Greedfall, however, this processing power appears to be largely idle. The measured FPS data shows no evidence of CPU limitation; the frame rates are entirely dependent on the resolution and quality preset, which are GPU-centric variables.

The CPU's role here is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic, a task it handles with ease. The fact that the 4K Ultra preset drops to 13 FPS while the 1080p Low preset hits 71 FPS demonstrates that the CPU can handle the game's simulation load at all settings. The bottleneck is purely the Radeon 880M's ability to rasterize the scene. The processor's high single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1743, ensures that it is not holding back the integrated GPU in this title. The data suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield near-linear performance gains, as the CPU has significant headroom to support a more powerful graphics solution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured performance data for Greedfall is complete for 12 combinations of resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the baseline for mobile gaming, the results are as follows: Low settings produce an average of 71 FPS. Medium settings yield 56 FPS, with a minimum of 47 FPS and a maximum of 64 FPS. High settings average 51 FPS. Ultra settings drop the average to 32 FPS. This shows a clear and steep trade-off between visual quality and frame rate at 1080p, with Low being the only preset to break the 60 FPS barrier.

At 2560x1440, the performance takes a significant hit. The Low preset averages 49 FPS. Medium settings average 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 44 FPS. High settings average 35 FPS. The Ultra preset is the weakest performer here, averaging only 22 FPS. None of these results achieve a consistent 60 FPS, and even the Low preset is below the 50 FPS mark, indicating that 1440p is a challenging resolution for this integrated GPU.

At 3840x2160, the performance is marginal at best. The Low preset averages 29 FPS. Medium settings average 23 FPS, with a minimum of 20 FPS and a maximum of 26 FPS. High settings average 21 FPS. The Ultra preset is practically unplayable, averaging just 13 FPS. The data shows that 4K is only feasible at the lowest settings for a very slow-paced experience, and even then, the frame rate is below 30 FPS, making it a poor choice for this hardware combination.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 880M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the Strix Point chip. It operates with a boost clock of 2900 MHz and has 768 shading units. Its benchmark scores are modest, with a Passmark G3D score of 7615 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 535, placing it in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs. In Greedfall, this GPU is the definitive performance limiter. The frame rates at all resolutions and settings are dictated by its rendering capabilities, not the CPU.

The GPU's performance characteristics are clearly shown in the resolution scaling. The Radeon 880M's memory bandwidth is "System Dependent," meaning it shares system memory, which is a common bottleneck for integrated graphics. The severe frame rate drops at 4K, where the average FPS falls to between 13 and 29, highlight the GPU's inability to handle the pixel fill rate demands of high-resolution rendering. The texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 46.40 GPixel/s are simply insufficient for Greedfall at higher resolutions. The data confirms that this is a 1080p-class GPU for this title, and its performance at 1440p and above is best avoided for a smooth experience.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience for this combo is at 1920x1080 resolution. The data shows that the Low preset is the only configuration that guarantees a frame rate above 60 FPS, with an average of 71 FPS. This is the recommended setting for players who prioritize smooth, responsive gameplay, particularly during combat. The Medium preset at 1080p is a viable alternative, offering an average of 56 FPS. While not a locked 60 FPS, the minimum of 47 FPS keeps the experience playable, and the visual upgrade over Low is noticeable.

For players who prefer higher visual fidelity, the High preset at 1080p, with an average of 51 FPS, is the best balance. It is not as smooth as Medium, but it is consistent and provides a more detailed image. The Ultra preset at 1080p, with an average of 32 FPS, is not recommended, as the frame rate drops to a level that will hinder gameplay. At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only recommendation, offering an average of 49 FPS. However, the 1080p Medium preset provides a better minimum frame rate and is the superior choice. The 4K resolution should be avoided entirely; even the Low preset's average of 29 FPS is too low for a comfortable experience.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Greedfall, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 880M ranks 2870 out of 2938 combos. This places it in the bottom 2.3% of all tested systems, confirming that it is a low-performance configuration for this particular game. The rank is a direct reflection of the integrated GPU's limitations, as the CPU is a high-end mobile processor. The data shows that the combo's performance is heavily skewed by the GPU's benchmark percentile of 43, which is significantly lower than the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking.

This low ranking is not surprising given the measured FPS data. The combo struggles to maintain 60 FPS even at 1080p Low, and its performance at higher resolutions is poor. The nearest rivals for the GPU, such as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, have similar average benchmark scores, but the integrated nature of the Radeon 880M means it shares memory bandwidth with the CPU, which can further impact real-world gaming performance. The ranking indicates that while the CPU is a strong component, the GPU holds the entire system back, resulting in a configuration that is only suitable for 1080p gaming at lower detail settings.