Greedfall

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a high-refresh-rate experience across the board in Greedfall, but the data reveals a clear transition in system bottleneck as resolution climbs. At 1920x1080, the combination is heavily CPU-bound, with frame rates ranging from 145 FPS at Ultra to a staggering 318 FPS at Low. The delta between these two settings is 173 FPS, indicating that the GPU has ample headroom and is being held back by the processor’s ability to feed it frames. Moving to 2560x1440, the spread narrows to 120 FPS (from 100 FPS at Ultra to 220 FPS at Low), showing a gradual shift toward GPU limitation. At 3840x2160, the gap compresses further to 71 FPS (60 FPS at Ultra to 131 FPS at Low), signaling that the RTX 4080 is now the primary constraint. The most significant resolution scaling drop occurs between 1080p Low and 4K Low, where average FPS falls from 318 to 131—a 58.8% reduction. This substantial decline underscores that while the i5-12400F can push very high frame rates at lower resolutions, the GPU’s workload at 4K becomes the dominant factor, and the CPU’s influence on performance diminishes proportionally.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo in Greedfall?*

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 318, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This demonstrates the CPU’s capability to drive extremely high frame rates when the GPU is not heavily burdened by pixel count or graphical effects.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 60. This is exactly at the threshold for smooth 60Hz gaming, but it represents the lowest performance point in the measured data, indicating that the RTX 4080 is fully saturated at this extreme configuration.

Q: Is the i5-12400F a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 in this game?

A: Benchmark results indicate a strong CPU bottleneck at 1080p. For instance, at High settings, 1080p yields 226 FPS, while 1440p yields 157 FPS, a 30.5% drop. This large reduction suggests the CPU is limiting performance at lower resolutions, as a purely GPU-bound scenario would show a smaller percentage decrease when moving from 1080p to 1440p.

Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, High settings average 157 FPS, while Ultra settings average 100 FPS. This represents a 57 FPS difference, or roughly a 36.3% performance penalty for enabling Ultra settings, which is a significant cost for the visual upgrade.

Q: How does the combo’s performance rank among all tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 254th out of 3703 tested combinations in Greedfall, placing it in the top 6.9% of all systems tested for this game. This indicates that the pairing is among the higher-performing configurations available in the database.

Q: Does the GPU’s memory bandwidth play a role in the observed 4K performance?

A: The RTX 4080 features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The data shows a substantial frame rate drop at 4K Ultra (60 FPS) compared to 4K High (94 FPS), suggesting that the combination of raw compute power and memory bandwidth is the limiting factor at this resolution and setting level.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the dominant component in this pairing at higher resolutions, and its specifications explain the performance trajectory seen in the data. The GPU is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC and contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 2205 MHz and a boost clock of 2505 MHz, which are relatively high frequencies that contribute to its substantial compute throughput of 48.74 TFLOPS for FP32 operations. The card’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s, which is critical for feeding the 9728 shading units at high resolutions. The benchmark data illustrates that this memory subsystem is sufficient for 4K gaming, but the frame rates at 4K Ultra (60 FPS) versus 4K High (94 FPS) indicate that the GPU’s execution units, not the memory bandwidth, are the primary constraint when settings are maxed out. The RTX 4080’s performance percentile of 86 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54247, aligns with its position as a high-end part. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores nearly identically at 54209 with a delta of only 0.1%, confirming that this GPU is at the top of its class. In Greedfall, the GPU’s role is clear: at 1080p, it is underutilized, as evidenced by the 318 FPS result at Low settings, but at 4K, it becomes the definitive bottleneck, with the gap between Low and Ultra settings shrinking to a 71 FPS difference, underscoring that the GPU is fully engaged at this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of this combo’s performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the results are consistently high, with Low settings averaging 318 FPS, Medium at 249 FPS (with a min of 212 and max of 287), High at 226 FPS, and Ultra at 145 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with the most substantial drop occurring between High (226 FPS) and Ultra (145 FPS), a 81 FPS penalty. At 2560x1440, the averages are 220 FPS for Low, 173 FPS for Medium (min 147, max 199), 157 FPS for High, and 100 FPS for Ultra. The relative scaling is similar, but the absolute numbers are lower, with the High-to-Ultra drop now being 57 FPS. At 3840x2160, the performance converges, with Low averaging 131 FPS, Medium at 103 FPS (min 88, max 119), High at 94 FPS, and Ultra at 60 FPS. The Medium setting at 4K provides the only min/max data points in the entire set, showing a range of 31 FPS, which suggests some variance in demanding scenes. Across all resolutions, the Low-to-Ultra performance gap is most pronounced at 1080p (a 173 FPS difference) and least at 4K (a 71 FPS difference). This data pattern is classic for a system that is CPU-limited at lower resolutions and GPU-limited at higher ones. The 4K Ultra result of 60 FPS is the only figure that dips to console-level refresh rates, while all other measured points exceed 94 FPS, indicating that the combo is capable of high-refresh-rate gameplay at 1440p and below with almost any settings.

How This Combo Ranks

In the context of the benchmark database, the combination of the Intel Core i5-12400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 achieves a rank of 254 out of 3703 tested combinations in Greedfall, placing it in the top 6.9% of all systems. This is a strong showing, but it is important to contextualize that rank. The i5-12400F has a percentile of 73 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19039, while the RTX 4080 has a percentile of 86 among all GPUs, with an average score of 54247. The combo’s rank in this game is likely influenced by the CPU’s performance at lower resolutions, which can drag down the average relative to systems with more powerful processors. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (avg score 19047, delta 0%), the Intel Core 3 201E (avg score 19056, delta -0.1%), and the Intel Core i5-1335U (avg score 18982, delta 0.3%), all have nearly identical scores, indicating that the i5-12400F is positioned in a dense performance cluster. This means that swapping the CPU for any of these near-identical rivals would not materially change the combo’s rank in Greedfall. Conversely, the GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, has a score of 54209 with a delta of 0.1%, which is statistically irrelevant. The rank of 254 suggests that while this is a high-performing combo, there are 253 other tested systems that outperform it, likely those featuring higher-end CPUs (like the Core i9 or Ryzen 9 series) paired with the same or better GPUs. For a game like Greedfall, which appears to be CPU-sensitive at lower resolutions, the CPU choice is likely the primary factor preventing this combo from ranking higher, despite the GPU’s top-tier status.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F serves as the system’s foundation, and its specifications reveal why it behaves as the limiting factor at 1080p. This processor features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, based on the Alder Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has an 18 MB shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. In synthetic benchmarks, its performance is solid but not exceptional: it scores 12380 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1680 in single-core, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 19433 and 3dmark max threads score of 5912. These numbers place it in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, which means it is better than a majority but far from the top. In the context of Greedfall, the data shows that at 1920x1080, the FPS is exceptionally high, often exceeding 200 FPS, which indicates that the CPU is able to process the game’s logic and draw calls quickly enough to feed the GPU. However, the fact that the FPS scales so dramatically with resolution (e.g., 318 FPS at 1080p Low vs. 131 FPS at 4K Low) suggests that the CPU’s single-thread performance, as evidenced by its 3dmark single thread score of 909, is sufficient to drive high frame rates but becomes less relevant as the GPU takes on more work. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and Intel Core i5-1335U, have nearly identical average scores, indicating that this is a common performance tier. In Greedfall, the CPU’s role is to provide a high baseline frame rate, and it does so effectively, but it cannot sustain the 4K Ultra experience, where the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The data indicates that for users targeting 1080p or 1440p high-refresh-rate gaming, this CPU is well-matched, but for 4K, the GPU dominates the performance equation.