Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S delivers a playable, though not uniformly smooth, experience in Greedfall. The data shows a system that scales predictably with resolution and settings, with the GPU acting as the primary constraint at higher loads. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes the hardware roles, and provides actionable settings guidance based strictly on the provided benchmark rows.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance curve as resolution increases, indicating a clear transition from a balanced load at 1080p to a heavily GPU-bound scenario at 4K. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average frame rate stands at 106 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same preset, the average drops to 74 FPS, a reduction of 32 FPS or approximately 30%. The leap to 3840x2160 is even more punishing, with High settings yielding only 44 FPS on average—a 42% decline from the 1440p figure and a 58% drop from the 1080p baseline.

This scaling pattern is consistent across all settings tiers. For Low settings, the averages fall from 149 FPS at 1080p to 103 FPS at 1440p and further to 62 FPS at 4K. Medium settings show a similar trajectory: 117 FPS at 1080p, 81 FPS at 1440p, and 48 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, drops from 68 FPS at 1080p to 47 FPS at 1440p and finally to 28 FPS at 4K. The fact that even Low settings cannot maintain 60 FPS at 4K (62 FPS average) suggests that the Radeon 8050S is the limiting component; the CPU’s performance headroom is not the bottleneck at this resolution.

The data indicates that the system is capable of exceeding 144 FPS only at the lowest resolution and settings combination (1080p Low), which positions it as a high-refresh-rate performer for esports or less demanding scenes but not for maxed-out visuals at 4K. The sharp 4K-to-1440p delta underscores that the 8050S’s compute resources are saturated when pixel count increases, making resolution the single most impactful variable for frame rate in this title.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, running on a 5 nm process. Its base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz provide substantial single-thread and multi-thread capabilities. In synthetic benchmarks, the chip achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 and a single-core score of 6030. These figures place it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 76212.

In the context of Greedfall, an Action RPG that typically relies on a few strong threads for game logic and physics, the 8945HX’s single-core performance is more relevant than its 32 threads. The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2532 and PassMark single-thread score of 3907 indicate that the processor can easily feed the GPU at 1080p, where the measured frame rates (106–149 FPS) are likely CPU-limited in some scenes. However, the fact that frame rates drop dramatically at higher resolutions—while the CPU’s workload remains relatively constant—confirms that the 8945HX is not the primary constraint in this pairing.

The nearest rivals in CPU benchmark scores include the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX with a deltaPct of 0.1% (essentially a tie) and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D with a deltaPct of 0.6% ahead. The 8945HX’s performance is therefore competitive with top-tier mobile parts, but its advantage does not translate to higher FPS in Greedfall at 4K, where the GPU is overwhelmed. The processor’s high boost clock of 5.40 GHz likely helps maintain minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the measured data only provides average FPS figures, with min FPS available only for Medium settings (e.g., 99 FPS at 1080p Medium). This suggests that the CPU can sustain playable averages, but the lack of min FPS data for other presets leaves some uncertainty about stutter under load.

The 8945HX’s 64 MB of L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are ample for gaming, but again, the benchmark results show that the GPU’s shared memory architecture is the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU’s role becomes more pronounced at 1080p, where the gap between Low (149 FPS) and High (106 FPS) settings indicates that even with lower graphical load, the system cannot push much beyond 150 FPS—a likely ceiling imposed by the combination of CPU and GPU, rather than the processor alone.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses the host’s DDR5 memory, which makes bandwidth "System Dependent." This is a critical factor in Greedfall, as the game’s texture streaming and draw calls rely on memory bandwidth, and the shared architecture can lead to contention with the CPU.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 8050S scores 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Vulkan, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 62108 is close to rivals such as the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (deltaPct 0.3% ahead) and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (deltaPct -2.6% behind). This indicates that the 8050S is a mid-range mobile GPU, capable of 1080p gaming but not designed for 4K ultra settings.

The measured FPS data confirms this positioning. At 4K Ultra, the average frame rate collapses to 28 FPS, which is unplayable for a smooth experience. Even at 4K High, the 44 FPS average is below the 60 FPS target, and the 4K Medium average of 48 FPS is only marginally better. The GPU’s raw compute (11.47 TFLOPS FP32) and pixel rate (179.2 GPixel/s) are insufficient for the pixel count at 4K, and the shared memory bandwidth further limits performance in texture-heavy scenes. The fact that 4K Low (62 FPS) is the only 4K setting that breaks 60 FPS suggests that the GPU is capable of handling the game’s geometry, but only when shader complexity is reduced.

At 1440p, the 8050S shows more promise: High settings average 74 FPS, and Low settings reach 103 FPS. This resolution appears to be the sweet spot for this GPU, balancing visual fidelity with playable frame rates. The 1080p results are even better, with High at 106 FPS and Low at 149 FPS, indicating that the GPU can drive high-refresh-rate displays at this resolution. However, the Ultra preset at 1080p (68 FPS) shows that the 8050S struggles with maxed-out effects even at the lowest resolution, likely due to the shared memory bottleneck and limited ROP count.

How This Combo Ranks

In the global database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Ryzen 9 8945HX and Radeon 8050S ranks 2155 out of 2938 combos for Greedfall. This places it in the bottom 27% of all systems tested, which is surprising given the individual component scores. The CPU ranks in the 95th percentile, and the GPU in the 89th, yet their combination yields a mid-to-low-tier result in this game. This discrepancy highlights the GPU’s role as a bottleneck: the 8050S’s performance, while respectable, is not sufficient to leverage the CPU’s strengths at higher resolutions.

The combo rank suggests that many other systems—likely with weaker CPUs but stronger discrete GPUs—outperform this pairing in Greedfall. For example, a system with a mid-range CPU and a high-end GPU would likely achieve higher FPS at 1440p and 4K, despite having a lower overall CPU benchmark score. The 8945HX’s multi-core prowess (Cinebench R23 42713) is wasted in this game, which does not scale well with 16 cores, and the GPU’s shared memory design limits its ability to compete with dedicated VRAM solutions.

The data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can deliver high frame rates, but it falls behind in the 4K segment where the GPU’s limitations are exposed. The rank of 2155/2938 reflects this reality: it is a capable 1080p machine, but not a top-tier performer overall. Users with this combo should target 1080p or 1440p with medium-to-high settings to get the best experience, rather than pushing for 4K.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p, the High preset (106 FPS average) offers an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, with the Medium preset (117 FPS) providing a small boost for those who prioritize smoothness. The Ultra preset at 68 FPS is still playable, but the 38 FPS drop from High to Ultra suggests diminishing returns in visual fidelity for a significant performance cost. The Low preset at 149 FPS is only recommended for competitive play or if the user has a 144 Hz+ display.

At 1440p, the High preset (74 FPS) is the recommended choice for a solid experience, while Medium (81 FPS) offers a slight advantage for those who want more headroom. The Low preset (103 FPS) is viable for high-refresh-rate monitors, but the visual downgrade is noticeable. The Ultra preset at 47 FPS is borderline, and users should avoid it unless they can tolerate sub-50 FPS averages.

For 4K, the data strongly suggests avoiding Ultra (28 FPS) and even High (44 FPS) unless the user is willing to accept a slideshow-like experience. The Medium preset at 48 FPS is the best playable option, but even it falls short of 60 FPS. The Low preset at 62 FPS is the only 4K setting that achieves a playable average, but it comes with significant visual compromises. Given these numbers, the recommended strategy is to play at 1080p or 1440p with High settings, as this provides the best balance of visual quality and performance. For 4K, users should stick to Low or Medium settings and accept the lower frame rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Greedfall?

A: The data shows 1440p with High settings (74 FPS average) is the sweet spot, offering a good balance of visual fidelity and smoothness. 1080p High (106 FPS) is also excellent, while 4K struggles to maintain 60 FPS even at Low settings.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Greedfall?

A: Yes, but with caveats. The only 4K setting that averages above 60 FPS is Low (62 FPS). Medium averages 48 FPS, High averages 44 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. For a consistently smooth experience, 4K is not recommended.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this game?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck at higher resolutions. The 4K-to-1080p FPS drop (e.g., 44 FPS vs. 106 FPS at High) is substantial, while the CPU’s high percentile rank (95th) indicates it is not the limiting factor.

Q: How does this combo compare to other systems?

A: It ranks 2155th out of 2938 tested combos for Greedfall, placing it in the bottom 27%. This is lower than expected given the component scores, due to the GPU’s limitations at higher resolutions.

Q: What settings should I use for the highest frame rates?

A: For maximum FPS, use 1080p with Low settings, which averages 149 FPS. For a balance of quality and speed, 1440p with High settings (74 FPS) is the best compromise.

Q: Are the frame rates stable, or do they vary?

A: The data includes min/max FPS only for Medium settings. At 1080p Medium, the range is 99–135 FPS, indicating some variability. At 1440p Medium, the range is 69–93 FPS, and at 4K Medium, it is 41–56 FPS. This suggests moderate frame pacing, but not severe stuttering.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table summarizes all measured FPS data for the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + AMD Radeon 8050S in Greedfall. All values are averages unless otherwise noted.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 1920x1080 | Low | 149 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 117 | 99 | 135 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 106 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 68 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 103 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 81 | 69 | 93 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 74 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 47 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 62 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 48 | 41 | 56 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 44 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28 | — | — |

The data shows a consistent pattern: each step up in settings costs roughly 20-30% performance at the same resolution, and each step up in resolution costs 30-40% performance at the same settings. The only exception is the jump from 1440p to 4K at Low settings, which drops from 103 FPS to 62 FPS (a 40% loss), highlighting the GPU’s memory bandwidth constraints at high pixel counts. The min FPS values for Medium settings indicate that frame dips are present but not catastrophic, with the 4K Medium min of 41 FPS being the lowest recorded. Overall, this combo is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p, with High settings providing the most consistent experience.