Greedfall
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 149 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 52 | 85 | 92 | 121 |
| 1440p QHD | 90 | 142 | 155 | 197 |
| 1080p Full HD | 130 | 208 | 225 | 290 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Greedfall with AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX delivers a high-refresh-rate experience in Greedfall, but the data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior as resolution climbs. At 1080p, the combination pushes frame rates well beyond 200 FPS, indicating that the CPU is doing the heavy lifting to keep the GPU fed. By 4K, the scaling pattern shows the GPU becoming the primary constraint, with the gap between settings presets narrowing significantly in relative terms.
Resolution Scaling
The measured frame rates show a predictable yet pronounced drop as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the High preset, the average FPS falls from 208 at 1080p to 141.5 at 1440p, a reduction of 66.5 FPS, and then to 84.7 at 4K, another drop of 56.8 FPS. This scaling indicates that the RX 7900 XTX is the limiting component at 4K, as the raw pixel throughput required by 3840x2160 outpaces the CPU’s ability to maintain the same frame generation.
Looking at the Low preset, the trend is even more pronounced. The 290.3 FPS at 1080p drops to 196.5 at 1440p and then to 120.9 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is roughly 58%, which is substantial and confirms that the GPU’s rendering capacity is the ceiling at higher resolutions. Notably, the gap between High and Low at 1080p is 82.3 FPS, while at 4K that same gap shrinks to 36.2 FPS. This compression suggests that at 4K, the GPU is so saturated that settings-based performance differences become less impactful, as the shader and memory workload dominates.
The Ultra preset tells a similar story, but with a steeper cliff. From 130.3 FPS at 1080p to 90.3 at 1440p and then 51.6 at 4K, the Ultra preset at 4K drops below 60 FPS, which is a critical threshold for smooth gameplay. The scaling from 1440p to 4K on Ultra is a 42.9% reduction, indicating that the extra visual fidelity comes at a severe cost at the highest resolution. The data suggests that for 4K gaming, users should look toward High or Medium presets, as Ultra pushes the GPU past its comfortable operating range.
FAQ
*Q: Does the Ryzen 9 5950X bottleneck the RX 7900 XTX in Greedfall at 1080p?*
A: No, the data indicates the opposite. At 1920x1080, the High preset achieves 208 FPS and Low reaches 290.3 FPS, which are extremely high values. The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, are sufficient to feed the GPU at these frame rates, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate scales consistently with settings changes.
Q: What is the best resolution for the Ultra preset with this hardware?
A: The measured FPS for Ultra at 2560x1440 is 90.3, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset falls to 51.6 FPS, which may result in noticeable stutter. Therefore, 1440p is the highest resolution where Ultra remains playable according to the data.
Q: How does the RX 7900 XTX compare to its nearest rival in the benchmark database?
A: The RX 7900 XTX has an average benchmark score of 44019, placing it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro 580, which scores 44195, a delta of -0.4%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 44900, putting the RX 7900 XTX 2% behind that card in aggregate benchmarks.
*Q: Is the 24 GB of VRAM on the RX 7900 XTX sufficient for Greedfall at 4K?*
A: Yes, the memory configuration is not a limiting factor in the measured results. The 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus provides 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 4K Ultra average of 51.6 FPS is not due to VRAM capacity, but rather the GPU’s compute throughput, as the game’s textures at Ultra settings are likely within the 24 GB allocation.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Medium and High presets across all resolutions?
A: At 1080p, Medium delivers 224.8 FPS and High delivers 208 FPS, a difference of 16.8 FPS. At 1440p, Medium hits 154.7 FPS and High is at 141.5 FPS, a 13.2 FPS gap. At 4K, Medium averages 92.4 FPS and High averages 84.7 FPS, a 7.7 FPS difference. The gap narrows as resolution increases, indicating that the GPU becomes the bottleneck.
Q: How does the CPU’s multi-threaded performance impact gaming?
A: The Ryzen 9 5950X scores 38607 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 16214 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 49062, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-14600K (49166). For Greedfall, this headroom means the CPU is rarely the limiting factor, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and frame rate, the High preset is the recommended starting point. At 2560x1440, it delivers 141.5 FPS, which is well above the refresh rate of most high-end monitors, and at 3840x2160 it maintains 84.7 FPS, which is acceptable for a slower-paced Action RPG. The Medium preset at 4K offers 92.4 FPS, a 7.7 FPS improvement over High, but the visual fidelity loss may not be worth the marginal gain for most users.
The Ultra preset should be avoided at 4K, as the 51.6 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS threshold for consistent smoothness. At 1440p, Ultra is viable at 90.3 FPS, but the difference between High and Ultra at that resolution is only 51.2 FPS, which is a significant jump for diminishing visual returns. The Low preset is not recommended for this hardware, as even at 4K it produces 120.9 FPS, meaning the user is leaving substantial visual quality on the table without a corresponding performance need.
For users with a 1080p monitor, the Ultra preset at 130.3 FPS is the best choice, as the GPU and CPU have enough headroom to maintain high frame rates while maximizing visual settings. The data shows that at 1080p, the system is CPU-bound, so the GPU has spare capacity to handle the extra load from Ultra settings. In summary, High at 1440p or 4K is the sweet spot, while Ultra is reserved for 1080p or 1440p users who prioritize fidelity over frame rate.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates are as follows: Low preset averages 120.9 FPS, Medium averages 92.4 FPS, High averages 84.7 FPS, and Ultra averages 51.6 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a total drop of 69.3 FPS, with the largest single-step decrease occurring between High and Ultra, a 33.1 FPS reduction. This indicates that the Ultra preset introduces effects that are disproportionately expensive at 4K.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates are significantly higher across all presets. Low averages 196.5 FPS, Medium averages 154.7 FPS, High averages 141.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 90.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 106.2 FPS, showing that the GPU has more headroom at this resolution to handle settings-based workload differences. The High to Ultra drop of 51.2 FPS is still substantial but less severe than at 4K.
At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance. Low averages 290.3 FPS, Medium averages 224.8 FPS, High averages 208 FPS, and Ultra averages 130.3 FPS. The Low to Ultra difference is 160 FPS, the largest spread in the dataset. At this resolution, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5450) becomes more relevant, as the high frame rates require rapid draw call processing. The 16-core processor’s 3.40 GHz base clock and 4.90 GHz boost clock are sufficient to sustain these numbers.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the dominant factor in the 4K results, as evidenced by the steep FPS declines at higher resolutions. With a boost clock of 2498 MHz and a game clock of 2365 MHz, the GPU’s raw compute power is substantial, but the data shows that at 4K Ultra, it is insufficient to maintain 60 FPS. The 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus provides 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for Greedfall’s textures, but the 6144 shading units and 192 ROPs are the limiting factors at extreme settings.
The GPU’s benchmark profile reinforces its position. Its average benchmark score is 44019, placing it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, scores 44195, a delta of -0.4%, meaning the RX 7900 XTX is effectively tied with a workstation card in aggregate tests. More relevantly, it trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti by 2%, which scores 44900. This context explains why the RX 7900 XTX struggles at 4K Ultra, as its raw performance is not class-leading.
The GPU’s memory clock of 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective) and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are not bottlenecks in the measured results. The transition from Medium to High at 4K only costs 7.7 FPS, suggesting that memory bandwidth is sufficient for the additional data. Instead, the 51.6 FPS at 4K Ultra points to compute shader and pixel fill rate limitations. The pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 959.2 GTexel/s are high, but the Ultra preset likely introduces heavy post-processing and shadow effects that tax the 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. In contrast, the CPU’s role is minimal at 4K, as the frame rates are GPU-bound, but at 1080p, the Ryzen 9 5950X’s 32 threads ensure the GPU never stalls, allowing the 290.3 FPS Low preset result.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in Greedfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 120.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 92.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 84.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 51.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 196.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 154.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 141.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 90.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 290.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 224.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 208.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 130.3 |
Greedfall with Ryzen 9 5950X + Other GPUs
See how Greedfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Greedfall with RX 7900 XTX + Other CPUs
See how Greedfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 5950X + RX 7900 XTX
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.