Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and Intel Arc B370 combination delivers a strictly 1080p gaming experience in Greedfall, with the GPU acting as the definitive performance ceiling. Benchmark results show that while the CPU provides ample headroom, the Arc B370’s integrated-class performance limits playability to the lowest presets at 1080p, and the frame rates deteriorate rapidly as resolution increases. The data is clear: this combo ranks 2699 out of 2938 tested combinations in this title, placing it in the bottom tier for playability.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a severe and consistent penalty when scaling from 1080p to 4K, confirming that the Intel Arc B370 is the primary bottleneck. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 76 FPS at 1080p to 53 FPS at 1440p, a 30% reduction, and then falls further to 31 FPS at 4K. This pattern shows that the GPU’s rendering throughput collapses under the increased pixel count, with the 4K result being less than half of the 1080p score.

The scaling behavior becomes even more pronounced at higher graphical presets. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 54 at 1080p to 38 at 1440p (a 30% drop) and then to 22 at 4K (a 59% drop from 1440p). This indicates that the Arc B370’s limited shading units and texture rate are overwhelmed when both resolution and shader complexity increase simultaneously. The 4K Ultra result of 14 FPS is a stark illustration of this limitation, showing that the highest preset is essentially unplayable at any resolution above 1080p.

The data suggests that the limiting component is unequivocally the GPU. The CPU, with its six cores and 12 threads, maintains consistent performance across resolutions, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate drops are directly proportional to the pixel count increase. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a plateau in FPS at lower resolutions, but instead, we see a steady decline from 1080p to 4K, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario. The 1080p Medium result of 60 FPS with a minimum of 51 FPS shows some stability, but the 4K Medium result of 25 FPS (with a minimum of 21 FPS) demonstrates that the GPU cannot sustain playable framerates beyond 1440p.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, and its performance in Greedfall reflects its hardware specifications. The GPU features 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster operation pipelines. Its boost clock is rated at 2400 MHz, with a base clock of 300 MHz. The chip’s pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, which are modest figures that explain the significant FPS drops at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system’s DDR5 memory rather than dedicated VRAM. This setup results in a memory bandwidth that is "System Dependent," which can introduce additional latency and bandwidth contention in a game like Greedfall that streams large textures. The measured benchmarks for the Arc B370 are limited, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are older, low-end parts like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (score 1186) and ATI Radeon HD 5770 (score 1190), indicating that the Arc B370’s raw performance is roughly on par with integrated graphics from over a decade ago.

In practical terms, this means the Arc B370 is only suitable for 1080p gaming at the lowest settings in Greedfall. The data shows that the GPU’s performance ceiling is reached at 76 FPS on Low at 1080p, and any increase in graphical fidelity or resolution causes a disproportionate drop in performance. The 4K Ultra result of 14 FPS is a clear indication that the GPU’s shading and texture units are saturated, and the system-shared memory cannot compensate for the lack of dedicated VRAM bandwidth. The GPU’s 25 W TDP and IGP slot width confirm that this is not a discrete gaming solution, and the benchmark results bear this out.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. In the context of Greedfall, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations, and the data indicates that it performs this role effectively without becoming a limiting factor. The CPU’s benchmark scores are robust, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 and a single-core score of 2943, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (avg score 24964, deltaPct 0.2) and the Intel Core i7-13620H (avg score 24911, deltaPct 0.4), showing that the 8400F is competitive with other modern mid-range parts. Its average benchmark score of 25005 is essentially identical to these rivals, with a delta of less than 0.5%. This means that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 8400F should perform comparably to these alternatives.

In Greedfall, the CPU’s performance is not the limiting factor. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a consistent decline that aligns with GPU load, not CPU load. At 1080p Low, the CPU can push 76 FPS, which is a solid result for a 2019 action RPG. The fact that the FPS drops to 31 at 4K Low indicates that the GPU is unable to maintain the same frame delivery, rather than the CPU being unable to process the game logic. The CPU’s 16 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support provide sufficient bandwidth for the game’s data requirements. The data suggests that the CPU has significant headroom remaining, as the frame rates are not capped by CPU threads or clock speeds but by the GPU’s rendering capabilities.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Greedfall with the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and Intel Arc B370 is consistent across all tested resolutions and settings, showing a clear hierarchy of performance.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the results are largely unplayable. The Ultra preset yields an average of 14 FPS, which is a slideshow by any standard. High settings improve to 22 FPS, but this is still below the threshold for smooth gameplay. Medium settings achieve 25 FPS, with a minimum of 21 FPS and a maximum of 28 FPS, indicating significant frame pacing issues. Low settings provide the best 4K result at 31 FPS, but this is still marginal and will result in noticeable stutter during combat or exploration.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the situation improves but remains constrained. The Ultra preset averages 24 FPS, which is below playable. High settings reach 38 FPS, offering a borderline experience. Medium settings produce 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS, which is the first preset at this resolution that approaches playability. Low settings achieve 53 FPS, which is a smooth experience, though the visual quality is significantly reduced.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combo finds its only viable range. The Ultra preset averages 35 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for an action RPG that requires precise timing. High settings yield 54 FPS, providing a comfortable experience. Medium settings hit 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS, representing the sweet spot for a balanced experience. Low settings achieve 76 FPS, which is the highest average recorded for this combo, offering the smoothest gameplay at the cost of visual fidelity.

The data shows that the transition from 1080p to 1440p results in a 30-40% performance drop across all settings, and the transition from 1440p to 4K results in a further 40-50% drop. This compounding degradation confirms that the Arc B370 is not capable of handling resolutions above 1080p in Greedfall without significant compromises.

FAQ

*Q: Is this combo capable of running Greedfall at 4K?*

A: No. The measured data shows that at 4K, the average FPS ranges from 14 FPS on Ultra to 31 FPS on Low. Even the best 4K result is below the 60 FPS target, and the Ultra preset is essentially unplayable at 14 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combination?

A: 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo achieves consistently playable frame rates. At 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 35 on Ultra to 76 on Low, with Medium hitting 60 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, which is 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, which is 0.5% higher. This indicates that the Arc B370 performs at a level similar to these older, low-end parts.

*Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F bottleneck the GPU in Greedfall?*

A: The data indicates no. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25005 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H. The FPS scaling across resolutions shows a GPU-bound pattern, with frame rates dropping proportionally to pixel count increases.

Q: What is the average FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset averages 76 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 35 FPS. This represents a 41 FPS difference, meaning Ultra delivers approximately 54% of the frame rate of Low.

Q: Is the Medium preset at 1440p viable for gameplay?

A: The Medium preset at 1440p averages 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS. While this is above 30 FPS, it is below the 60 FPS target and may result in noticeable frame drops during intense scenes.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo is achieved at 1080p with the Medium preset, which delivers an average of 60 FPS with a minimum of 51 FPS. This configuration provides a stable frame rate that is suitable for an action RPG, balancing visual quality with performance. The Medium preset at 1080p is the only setting that achieves a 60 FPS average without dipping below 50 FPS, making it the most reliable choice for consistent gameplay.

For players who prioritize frame rate over visuals, the Low preset at 1080p offers the highest average FPS at 76, ensuring maximum smoothness. However, the visual downgrade is significant, and the Medium preset provides a better balance of fidelity and performance. The High preset at 1080p, averaging 54 FPS, is a viable alternative for those who want slightly better graphics, but the lower minimum frame rate potential makes it less stable than Medium.

At 1440p, the data suggests that only the Low preset (53 FPS) approaches playability, but the visual quality is heavily compromised. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 41 FPS, which is playable but may cause frustration during combat. The Ultra preset at both 1080p and 1440p should be avoided, as the 35 FPS and 24 FPS averages respectively do not provide a satisfactory experience for a game that requires responsive controls. The 4K resolution should be avoided entirely, as all presets yield average FPS below 31, which is below the threshold for comfortable gameplay. The recommended configuration is 1080p Medium, with 1080p Low as a fallback for higher frame rates.