Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Greedfall, with the benchmark data showing that the pairing is well-balanced for this Action RPG. The measured results indicate that the CPU provides ample headroom for the GPU across most settings, while the graphics card becomes the primary bottleneck only at the most demanding presets and resolutions.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and runs at a base clock of 4.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. This configuration provides a strong foundation for gaming, as evidenced by its synthetic benchmark scores: the chip achieves a single-thread score of 3406 in Cinebench R23 and a multicore score of 24128 in the same test. The processor’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support contribute to its responsiveness in game workloads.

In Greedfall, the data shows that the CPU is not a limiting factor in most scenarios. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches 192.4 FPS, which is a high enough frame rate that the CPU’s thread management and clock speeds are clearly sufficient to feed the GPU. The 7600X’s 3DMark scores reinforce this: it scores 6879 in the 16-thread test and 5715 in the 8-thread test, indicating strong scaling across the cores that the game is likely to use. The processor’s performance percentile ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, placing it comfortably above average for gaming tasks.

The CPU’s nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U, with delta percentages of 0% and -0.1% respectively. This means the 7600X is essentially on par with these mobile-oriented chips in raw compute, but for desktop gaming, its higher boost clock and dedicated platform advantages translate into smoother frame pacing in Greedfall. The data suggests that even at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, where the combo produces 59.3 FPS, the CPU retains enough headroom to avoid stutter, as the frame rate drop is more attributable to GPU load than processor limitations.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s boost clock reaches 2600 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz, and it has 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs. These specifications allow it to deliver a peak FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS, which is substantial for a card in this class.

In Greedfall, the GPU’s role becomes increasingly critical as settings rise. At 1920x1080, the card handles all presets with ease: it posts 192.4 FPS on Low, 150.1 FPS on Medium, 133.6 FPS on High, and 84.5 FPS on Ultra. The 12 GB VRAM buffer is more than sufficient for the game’s textures at these resolutions, as evidenced by the minimal performance drop between Medium and High settings (a 17.3 FPS difference). However, at 3840x2160 Ultra, the card’s limits are exposed, with the average FPS dropping to 36.1. This indicates that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute units are saturated by the 4K Ultra workload.

The GPU’s synthetic scores align with its gaming behavior. It scores 20700 in Passmark G3D and 137249 in Geekbench Metal, placing it in the 79th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (deltaPct 0.2%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (deltaPct -1.3%), which shows that the 6750 XT is competitive with higher-tier cards in certain workloads but not a top-tier performer. For Greedfall, the practical takeaway is that the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K Ultra, but it remains capable at 1440p and below.

FAQ

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 133.6, which provides a smooth experience for most players. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and leaves room for VRR displays.

*Q: Is the 12 GB VRAM on the RX 6750 XT enough for Greedfall at 1440p?*

A: Yes. At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves 59.3 FPS, and the VRAM allocation is not a limiting factor. The 12 GB buffer handles the game’s textures without issue at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600X scores 26272 on average, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (26262) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U (26305). The delta percentages are 0% and -0.1%, indicating performance parity in compute tasks.

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Greedfall with this combo?*

A: The data suggests 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. At High settings, the combo delivers 92.5 FPS, which balances visual fidelity with high refresh rate capability. At 4K, only Low settings (76.4 FPS) or Medium (63.8 FPS) are playable.

Q: Does the GPU support modern APIs for this game?

A: Yes, the RX 6750 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. This ensures compatibility with Greedfall’s rendering features and allows for future-proofing.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations in this game?

A: It ranks 850 out of 1705 tested combos, placing it in the middle of the pack. This suggests it is a solid but not exceptional pairing for Greedfall, with the GPU being the more limiting factor at higher settings.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimizing the Greedfall experience. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset yields 84.5 FPS, which is playable but leaves performance on the table for high-refresh-rate monitors. Dropping to High raises the average to 133.6 FPS, a significant improvement of 49.1 FPS, with minimal visual impact in most scenes. For competitive or fast-paced play, Medium at 150.1 FPS offers even more headroom, but High strikes the best balance between image quality and frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 92.5 FPS, which is ideal for 1440p 144Hz displays. The Ultra preset drops to 59.3 FPS, which is still smooth but may be preferable for those who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate. Medium at 104.8 FPS is a viable alternative for players who want a middle ground. At 3840x2160, the situation changes drastically: High produces 59 FPS, but Medium (63.8 FPS) and Low (76.4 FPS) are the only presets that stay comfortably above 60 FPS. Ultra at 36.1 FPS is not recommended for consistent gameplay.

The data indicates that the optimal experience depends on the target resolution. For 1080p and 1440p, High settings are recommended as they provide the best frame rate per visual quality. For 4K, Low or Medium settings are necessary to maintain playable frame rates, as the GPU struggles with the Ultra preset. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient across all presets, so the bottleneck is purely compute and bandwidth, not memory capacity.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination ranks 850 out of 1705 tested combos in Greedfall. This places it in the 50th percentile of all configurations, indicating that it is a midline performer. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking among all processors is higher than the GPU’s 79th percentile, suggesting that the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card does. In practice, this means the GPU is the limiting factor for this pairing in Greedfall.

Compared to the GPU’s nearest rivals, the RX 6750 XT’s average score of 35327 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (35264) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile (35435). The delta percentages are 0.2% and -0.3%, respectively, showing that the card is well within the performance envelope of these competitors. However, the combo’s middle-of-the-pack ranking suggests that other configurations with stronger GPUs or CPUs would yield higher frame rates in Greedfall, particularly at 4K Ultra.

The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it performs admirably. At 4K, it falls short of top-tier performance, but it remains usable with adjusted settings. For builders looking for a balanced mid-range system, this pairing offers a reasonable compromise, but those seeking higher frame rates at 4K would need to consider a more powerful GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a comprehensive view of performance. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 192.4 FPS on Low, 150.1 FPS on Medium, 133.6 FPS on High, and 84.5 FPS on Ultra. The performance scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 56.1% reduction in frame rate, which is typical for a game that scales well with GPU load.

At 2560x1440, the results are 132.8 FPS on Low, 104.8 FPS on Medium, 92.5 FPS on High, and 59.3 FPS on Ultra. The drop from High to Ultra is 33.2 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a significant additional load on the GPU. At 3840x2160, the data shows 76.4 FPS on Low, 63.8 FPS on Medium, 59 FPS on High, and 36.1 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Ultra result is the only measurement below 60 FPS, confirming that this resolution and preset combination is beyond the GPU’s comfortable range.

Across all resolutions, the Low preset provides the highest frame rates, with the 1080p Low result of 192.4 FPS being the maximum measured. The Ultra preset consistently shows the largest performance penalty, with the 4K Ultra result of 36.1 FPS being the minimum. The data demonstrates that the combo scales predictably with resolution and settings, making it easy for users to tune their experience based on their display capabilities.