Greedfall

Greedfall, the 2019 Action RPG, presents an interesting case study for a top-tier pairing like the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The benchmark data reveals a configuration that is brutally fast across the board, yet whose behavior shifts depending on resolution and preset. The measured FPS figures show a system capable of triple-digit frame rates at nearly every setting, but the scaling patterns invite a closer look at where the bottlenecks lie. This analysis will break down the specific numbers, the role of each component, and what the data implies for a smooth gameplay experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance rank of this CPU/GPU combination in Greedfall?

A: The combo ranks 42nd out of 1705 tested combinations, placing it in the top 2.5% of all systems tested for this specific title.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7600 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 26617, which is nearly identical to its closest competitors. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and the AMD EPYC 8024P, and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900K, while being 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-12900HK.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does that signify?

A: The RTX 4090 sits in the 91st percentile of all GPUs. This indicates that it outperforms 91% of all other graphics cards in the database, underscoring its position as a top-tier performer.

Q: At which resolution and settings does the system achieve its highest frame rate?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 352.1, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is significantly higher than any other configuration tested.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between 1080p and 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the system averages 162.1 FPS, while at 4K Ultra, it averages 66.9 FPS. This represents a substantial drop of 95.2 FPS when moving to the higher resolution.

Q: Does the data indicate a CPU or GPU bottleneck at 4K?

A: The data suggests a growing GPU bottleneck at 4K. The frame rate scales down with resolution, dropping from 352.1 FPS at 1080p Low to 147.8 FPS at 4K Low, a 204.3 FPS reduction that points to the GPU becoming the limiting factor as pixel count increases.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is the undisputed heavyweight in this pairing. Its specifications are formidable: a massive 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus provides 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. This immense memory pool ensures that even the most demanding textures at 4K resolution will not exceed the available VRAM, preventing potential stutters or texture pop-in. The GPU’s core clocks are also exceptionally high, with a base clock of 2235 MHz and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. This high-frequency operation is a key driver behind its raw compute power, which the benchmarks quantify with a Passmark G3D score of 38194.

In the context of Greedfall, this hardware muscle translates to exceptional performance. The data shows that at 4K with High settings, the system still manages an average of 104.5 FPS, which is well above the standard 60 FPS target. Even more telling is the 4K Low result of 147.8 FPS, which demonstrates that the GPU has enough headroom to run the game at high refresh rates even at the most demanding resolution. However, the data also reveals the cost of pushing the game to its absolute limits. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS plummets to 66.9. This 37.6 FPS drop from High to Ultra indicates that the Ultra preset likely introduces effects that are particularly taxing on the GPU, such as advanced shadows and ambient occlusion, which significantly impact the render time. The GPU’s 91st percentile ranking reinforces that it is a top-tier component, but Greedfall’s Ultra preset can still challenge it at 4K, bringing it closer to the 60 FPS threshold.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 serves as a capable and balanced partner for the RTX 4090. It is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Its 32 MB of shared L3 cache is a crucial asset for gaming, helping to reduce memory latency and improve performance in scenarios that are sensitive to data access speeds. The CPU’s synthetic benchmark scores are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22992 and a single-core score of 3246. This single-core performance is particularly important for gaming, as many game engines, including those used in Action RPGs like Greedfall, still rely heavily on a few primary threads.

In this specific game, the CPU’s role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU is less burdened by pixel rendering, allowing the CPU to become the primary limiter. The data shows this clearly: at 1080p Low, the system hits 352.1 FPS, but this is likely near the practical limit of what the game engine and CPU can feed to the GPU. The CPU's benchmark scores place it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Intel Core i9-12900HK. The deltaPct values are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that for this game, the Ryzen 5 7600 is on equal footing with those high-end processors. This means it is unlikely to be a significant bottleneck, even when pushing for the highest frame rates at 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 7600 and RTX 4090 achieves a rank of 42 out of 1705 tested combos in Greedfall. This is a stellar result, placing it in the top 2.5% of all systems. This ranking reflects the raw power of the RTX 4090, which is a dominant force in the GPU hierarchy. The CPU, while not the absolute best available, is more than sufficient to support the GPU without holding it back in a meaningful way. The data implies that the GPU is the primary driver of this high rank. If the CPU were a weaker model, the rank would likely be significantly lower, as it would struggle to keep the RTX 4090 fed with data at higher frame rates.

The fact that this combo is number 42 rather than number 1 suggests that there are a handful of other combinations that can edge it out. These are likely pairings of the RTX 4090 with even more powerful CPUs, such as those with higher core counts or faster single-thread performance. However, the 42nd place ranking also shows that the Ryzen 5 7600 is not a weak link. The difference in performance between the 42nd and 1st place combos is likely to be small, and in a real-world gaming scenario, the experience would be nearly identical. The benchmark data indicates that this combo offers an incredibly high level of performance that would satisfy even the most demanding users.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the most balanced experience is achieved with the High preset. This preset provides an excellent compromise between visual fidelity and performance across all tested resolutions. At 4K, it delivers a smooth 104.5 FPS, which is a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS standard. At 1440p, it jumps to 172.4 FPS, and at 1080p, it reaches 251.1 FPS. These numbers make the High preset ideal for users with high-refresh-rate monitors, as it allows them to take full advantage of their display's capabilities without sacrificing significant visual quality.

While the Ultra preset offers the highest level of visual detail, it comes with a substantial performance cost. At 4K, it drops to 66.9 FPS, which is still playable but much lower than High. At 1440p, it averages 110.5 FPS, and at 1080p, it hits 162.1 FPS. For users who prioritize smoothness and high frame rates, the Ultra preset may not be the best choice, especially at 4K. Conversely, the Low and Medium presets offer very high frame rates, but they do so by significantly reducing visual quality. The data suggests that for the vast majority of users, the High preset is the sweet spot, providing a great-looking game that runs exceptionally well. For those with 4K 120Hz or 144Hz displays, the Ultra preset at 1440p might be a more viable option than 4K Ultra.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the system's performance across all major resolutions and presets. Here is a detailed breakdown:

• 3840x2160 (4K):
• Ultra: 66.9 FPS
• High: 104.5 FPS
• Medium: 116.5 FPS
• Low: 147.8 FPS

• 2560x1440 (1440p):
• Ultra: 110.5 FPS
• High: 172.4 FPS
• Medium: 191.6 FPS
• Low: 241.7 FPS

• 1920x1080 (1080p):
• Ultra: 162.1 FPS
• High: 251.1 FPS
• Medium: 279.3 FPS
• Low: 352.1 FPS

The data shows a consistent trend: frame rates increase as resolution decreases and as settings are lowered. The most significant jump is from Ultra to High, which provides a substantial FPS boost at every resolution. The gap between High and Medium is smaller, and the gap between Medium and Low is smaller still. This indicates that the Ultra preset is the most demanding, and the difference between the other presets is less pronounced. The absolute peak performance is at 1080p Low with 352.1 FPS, while the lowest recorded average is at 4K Ultra with 66.9 FPS.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important information about the system's bottleneck characteristics. Moving from 1080p to 1440p, the FPS drops by a significant margin. For example, at High settings, it goes from 251.1 FPS to 172.4 FPS, a reduction of 78.7 FPS. The drop from 1440p to 4K is even more pronounced, with the High preset falling from 172.4 FPS to 104.5 FPS, a further reduction of 67.9 FPS. This pattern is consistent across all settings, with the Low preset showing the largest absolute drop from 352.1 FPS at 1080p to 147.8 FPS at 4K, a total reduction of 204.3 FPS.

This scaling behavior is a classic sign of a system that becomes increasingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU and GPU are both working hard, but the CPU has more headroom to feed the GPU. As the resolution increases to 1440p and then 4K, the GPU's workload grows exponentially due to the increased pixel count. The RTX 4090, despite its immense power, cannot maintain the same high frame rates, and its performance becomes the primary limiting factor. The data shows that the system is fully capable of delivering high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the focus shifts from maximizing FPS to maintaining a stable, high-quality experience. The 4K results, particularly the 104.5 FPS at High and 66.9 FPS at Ultra, indicate that the GPU is the definitive bottleneck at this resolution, and the CPU's role becomes less critical.