Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Greedfall, with the data showing that the pairing ranks 694th out of 2,938 tested combinations in this game. The measured frames per second (FPS) results reveal a system that handles the Action RPG comfortably at most settings, though the Ultra preset introduces a significant performance penalty across all resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 177, which represents a strong baseline for smooth gameplay.

*Q: How does the combo rank in Greedfall compared to other tested configurations?*

A: This specific CPU and GPU pairing ranks 694th out of 2,938 tested combos, placing it in the top 23.6% of all recorded configurations for this game.

Q: What is the largest FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 177 at 1080p to 73 at 3840x2160, a reduction of 104 FPS. This represents a 58.8% decrease in performance.

Q: Which settings preset provides the highest average FPS at 1440p?

A: The Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 2560x1440, achieving 172 FPS. Medium follows at 135 FPS, then High at 123 FPS, and Ultra at 78 FPS.

Q: Is there a measurable FPS range recorded for any settings?

A: Yes, the Medium preset at every resolution includes both minimum and maximum FPS data. At 1080p, the range is 166 to 224 FPS; at 1440p, it is 115 to 155 FPS; and at 4K, it is 69 to 93 FPS.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking compared to all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44,573.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 (Raphael) architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its base clock is 4.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, and it carries a 65 W TDP. The processor features a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a defining characteristic for this chip. This large cache, combined with 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, suggests a design optimized for workloads that benefit from rapid data access. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for a desktop part.

In Greedfall, the CPU's role is primarily to feed the GPU with rendered frames and manage game logic. The benchmark results indicate that the processor is not a limiting factor at most tested settings. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 248 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that demands strong single-thread performance. The CPU's single-thread benchmark score of 3,494 in Passmark supports this capability. The multithread score of 25,047 and integer math score of 70,774 further indicate a capable processor for handling the various computational tasks an Action RPG presents, including AI, physics, and world state updates.

The processor's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H with a score of 44,466 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44,342 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 at 44,309 (0.6% higher). The Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44,889, which is 0.7% lower than the 7500X3D. These deltas are very small, meaning the 7500X3D sits in a tightly contested performance band. For Greedfall, the data suggests that this CPU provides ample headroom, as the FPS differences between settings presets are more likely driven by GPU load, especially at higher resolutions and quality settings.

The 96 MB L3 cache is a notable feature that could benefit game performance by reducing memory latency. However, the measured FPS data does not isolate cache effects. The CPU's boost clock of 4.50 GHz is modest compared to some rivals, but the combination of cache and clock speed appears sufficient for this game. The processor's production status is Active, and it was released on 2025-11-11, making it a recent addition to the market. Its launch MSRP is $269. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not an option, but its stock performance in this benchmark is adequate.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The GPU has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate and other modern APIs. Its base clock is 1920 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The GPU's FP32 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS, and it has a TDP of 200 W. The card is dual-slot and requires a 550 W suggested PSU, with a single 16-pin power connector.

In Greedfall, the RTX 4070's role becomes more pronounced as resolution and settings increase. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 248 FPS, which is likely CPU-bound at that point. However, at 4K Ultra, the average FPS falls to 47, indicating the GPU is under heavy load. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for this game at all tested settings, as there are no reported issues with memory capacity. The memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s is a significant factor in high-resolution performance, and the data shows a clear scaling pattern.

The GPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with a score of 37,628 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 37,507 (0.4% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile at 38,135 (1.3% lower). The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37,157, which is 1.3% lower. The RTX 4070 itself has an average benchmark score of 37,648 and ranks in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. These rival deltas are small, placing the RTX 4070 in a competitive position, but for Greedfall specifically, the measured FPS shows a capable card that struggles only at the most demanding preset.

The GPU's boost clock of 2475 MHz and texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s are relevant for the rendering workload. The pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s also contributes to fill-rate-bound scenarios. In this game, the transition from High to Ultra settings at any resolution causes a substantial FPS drop, which suggests that the Ultra preset includes effects that heavily tax the GPU. The data shows that the RTX 4070 can handle High settings at 4K with an average of 73 FPS, which is playable, but Ultra at 4K drops to 47 FPS, which may be below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The GPU's production status is End-of-life, and its launch MSRP is 599 USD.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Greedfall covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a comprehensive view of performance.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 248 FPS, which is the highest recorded value in the entire dataset. Medium settings produce an average of 195 FPS with a range of 166 to 224 FPS. High settings yield 177 FPS, and Ultra drops to 113 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a reduction of 135 FPS, or 54.4%.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 172 FPS. Medium settings deliver 135 FPS, with a range of 115 to 155 FPS. High settings produce 123 FPS, and Ultra falls to 78 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 94 FPS, representing a 54.7% decrease. Compared to 1080p, the same settings show a reduction in FPS: Low drops by 76 FPS, Medium by 60 FPS, High by 54 FPS, and Ultra by 35 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 103 FPS. Medium settings deliver 81 FPS, with a range of 69 to 93 FPS. High settings produce 73 FPS, and Ultra drops to 47 FPS. The reduction from Low to Ultra at 4K is 56 FPS, a 54.4% decrease. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the FPS losses are substantial: Low drops by 69 FPS, Medium by 54 FPS, High by 50 FPS, and Ultra by 31 FPS.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: the percentage drop from Low to Ultra is nearly identical across all resolutions, hovering around 54%. This suggests that the settings preset has a similar relative impact regardless of resolution. However, the absolute FPS values diverge significantly, with 4K Ultra being the only configuration that dips below 60 FPS. The Medium preset at all resolutions includes minimum and maximum FPS values, which provide insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p, the range is 58 FPS; at 1440p, it is 40 FPS; and at 4K, it is 24 FPS. This narrowing range at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU becomes more consistently loaded, reducing frame time spikes.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 achieves a rank of 694 out of 2,938 tested combos in Greedfall. This ranking places the setup in the upper quartile of all configurations, indicating that it performs better than the majority of tested systems. The rank is a composite measure that considers the overall FPS across the tested scenarios.

Given the measured FPS data, this ranking is reasonable. The system delivers high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, with most presets exceeding 100 FPS. At 4K, the system is still playable at Low and Medium settings, but Ultra settings drop to 47 FPS. The rank of 694 suggests that there are 693 combinations that perform better, which likely include higher-end GPUs such as the RTX 4080 or 4090, or CPUs with more cores. However, the deltaPct values for the CPU's nearest rivals are minimal, so the CPU is not the differentiator. The GPU's nearest rivals also show small deltas, meaning the RTX 4070 is near the top of its class.

The data implies that for Greedfall, this combo is well-balanced. The CPU provides enough performance to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions, and the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. The rank of 694 out of 2,938 means the combo is in the top 23.6%, which is a strong result for a mid-to-high-range pairing. The fact that the CPU and GPU both sit near the top of their respective benchmark percentiles (89th for CPU, 81st for GPU) aligns with this ranking. The combo's performance is not exceptional enough to break into the top 100, but it is clearly above average.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate.

For 1920x1080, all presets deliver playable frame rates. Low at 248 FPS is excessive for most displays, but High at 177 FPS is a good balance of visual quality and performance. Medium at 195 FPS is also viable, but High provides a better visual experience with only a 18 FPS penalty. Ultra at 113 FPS is still smooth and offers the best visuals, making it a reasonable choice for 1080p if the monitor supports high refresh rates.

For 2560x1440, High settings at 123 FPS are recommended for a smooth experience with good visuals. Medium at 135 FPS is slightly faster but with reduced quality. Low at 172 FPS is not necessary unless the user prioritizes maximum frame rate. Ultra at 78 FPS is playable but marginal for fast-paced action, as it may dip below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. The data shows that High is the sweet spot at 1440p, offering a 45 FPS advantage over Ultra while maintaining a high frame rate.

For 3840x2160, the choices are more constrained. High settings at 73 FPS are playable and offer good visuals, but Medium at 81 FPS is a safer choice for maintaining a higher frame rate. Low at 103 FPS is the fastest option but sacrifices significant visual fidelity. Ultra at 47 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold and is not recommended for a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset at 4K has a recorded range of 69 to 93 FPS, indicating some variance but generally staying above 60 FPS.

The best overall experience per the measured rows is likely High settings at 1440p, which balances visual quality and performance at 123 FPS. For 4K users, Medium settings at 81 FPS provide a good compromise. The data suggests that Ultra settings are only viable at 1080p, where the 113 FPS average remains smooth.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the nature of the limiting component in this system. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 248 at 1080p to 172 at 1440p and 103 at 4K. This represents a 30.6% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 58.5% drop from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is not linear, indicating that the GPU becomes increasingly stressed as pixel count rises.

At High settings, the FPS drops from 177 at 1080p to 123 at 1440p and 73 at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 30.5%, and from 1080p to 4K is 58.8%. These percentages are nearly identical to the Low preset, suggesting that the resolution scaling is consistent across settings. At Ultra settings, the FPS drops from 113 at 1080p to 78 at 1440p and 47 at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 31.0%, and from 1080p to 4K is 58.4%.

The consistency of these percentage drops across presets indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor when moving to higher resolutions. The CPU's performance is sufficient to maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions, as evidenced by the 248 FPS at 1080p Low. However, as the resolution increases, the GPU's rendering workload grows, and the FPS drops proportionally. The RTX 4070's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this game, but the raw compute power is not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra.

The data also shows that the FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 30% across all settings, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. The drop from 1440p to 4K is another 40% relative to the 1440p value, indicating that 4K requires significantly more GPU resources. For example, at High settings, the drop from 1440p to 4K is 50 FPS (from 123 to 73), a 40.7% reduction. This pattern confirms that the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions, while the CPU has enough headroom to avoid bottlenecking. The ultra preset at 4K, with its 47 FPS average, is the clearest indication of GPU saturation. The system is well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but 4K Ultra is beyond the RTX 4070's comfortable range in this title.