Greedfall

Greedfall

AVERAGE FPS
87
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 87 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 31 49 54 69
1440p QHD 53 83 91 116
1080p Full HD 76 119 131 167

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 54
3840x2160 High 49
3840x2160 Ultra 31
2560x1440 Low 116
2560x1440 Medium 91
2560x1440 High 83
2560x1440 Ultra 53
1920x1080 Low 167
1920x1080 Medium 131
1920x1080 High 119
1920x1080 Ultra 76

Greedfall with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination delivers a playable but demanding 4K experience in Greedfall, with the data showing a clear shift in performance bottlenecks as resolution increases. The measured FPS across the board indicates that this pairing is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p or solid 1440p gaming, while 4K requires careful settings management to stay within acceptable frame rates.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and reveals where the system's limits lie. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 119 at 1920x1080 to 83 at 2560x1440, then to 49 at 3840x2160. This represents a 30% reduction when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 41% reduction when jumping to 4K. The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets, with the total drop from 1080p to 4K ranging from 54% at Low settings (167 to 69 FPS) to 59% at Ultra settings (76 to 31 FPS).

The frame rate behavior indicates that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. The Ryzen 5 7400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, shows it can feed the GPU adequately at 1080p, where even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains 76 FPS. However, the RX 9060's 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit memory bus begin to show strain as pixel count rises. The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens dramatically at 4K: a 38 FPS difference at 1080p (167 vs 76) grows to a 38 FPS difference at 4K as well, but the percentage gap increases from 55% to 123%, suggesting the GPU is working progressively harder relative to its capabilities.

Interestingly, the scaling from Medium to High at each resolution is relatively modest, while the jump from High to Ultra is severe. At 1440p, Medium averages 91 FPS, High drops to 83 FPS, but Ultra collapses to 53 FPS. This pattern repeats at 4K (54, 49, and 31 FPS respectively) and suggests that the Ultra preset includes effects or settings that disproportionately impact the RX 9060's rendering pipeline. The data points to a system that is balanced at 1080p, GPU-bound at 1440p, and severely GPU-limited at 4K.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with a Navi 44 chip manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, delivering a peak FP32 performance of 21.43 TFLOPS.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration yields a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s. The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16014. Its nearest rivals in aggregate performance are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (scoring 16129, a 0.7% difference), the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, 1% difference), and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852, 1% difference). This places the RX 9060 in a competitive mid-range tier, but the Greedfall results show it struggles with the game's Ultra preset at higher resolutions.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is the most likely constraint at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 31. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while respectable for the class, appears insufficient for the texture and geometry demands of Greedfall at 3840x2160 with maximum settings. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility are modern, but the measured results indicate that the rendering load at 4K exceeds what this memory configuration can efficiently handle. At 1080p, however, the GPU performs admirably, with the Low preset hitting 167 FPS and even Ultra maintaining a smooth 76 FPS.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Greedfall at 4K smoothly?*

A: The data shows average FPS of 49 at High settings and 54 at Medium settings for 3840x2160 resolution. These are below the 60 FPS threshold typically considered smooth, so 4K gaming requires accepting frame rates in the 49-54 range or lower. The Ultra preset drops to 31 FPS, which is not recommended for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: At 1920x1080, all settings presets deliver playable frame rates, with the lowest being 76 FPS at Ultra. At 2560x1440, High settings maintain 83 FPS and Medium hits 91 FPS, making 1440p a strong option. The data indicates 1080p is the sweet spot for high refresh rates, while 1440p offers a good balance of visual quality and performance.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, placing it 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129), 1% above the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862), and 1% above the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852). This places it in a tight competitive cluster, with performance differences under 1% among its nearest rivals.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F a bottleneck for the RX 9060?

A: Given the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs and its 21765 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, the processor is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most scenarios. The FPS drops from 1080p to 4K are more consistent with GPU limitations, indicating the RX 9060 becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

Q: What settings preset should be avoided with this hardware?

A: The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 produces an average FPS of 31, which is below playable standards. Even at 2560x1440, Ultra drops to 53 FPS. The data suggests avoiding Ultra at 4K and being cautious with it at 1440p, as the performance penalty relative to High settings is severe.

Q: How does the Medium preset compare to High in terms of FPS?

A: Medium consistently outperforms High across all resolutions. At 1080p, Medium averages 131 FPS versus 119 for High. At 1440p, the difference is 91 versus 83 FPS. At 4K, Medium hits 54 FPS compared to 49 for High. The Medium preset provides a measurable performance boost with presumably minimal visual compromise.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance for this hardware combination. At 1920x1080, Medium achieves 131 FPS with a minimum of 112 FPS, providing headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 2560x1440, Medium delivers 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 FPS, keeping gameplay above the 60 FPS threshold with room to spare. Even at 3840x2160, Medium manages 54 FPS with a minimum of 46 FPS, which is the only 4K setting that approaches playability.

The High preset is a reasonable alternative for users prioritizing visual quality over frame rate. It delivers 119 FPS at 1080p and 83 FPS at 1440p, both of which are smooth. However, at 4K, High drops to 49 FPS, which is borderline for action RPG gameplay. The Low preset provides maximum performance — 167 FPS at 1080p and 116 FPS at 1440p — but the visual compromise is likely unnecessary given the CPU and GPU's capabilities.

The Ultra preset should be avoided at all resolutions above 1080p. At 1440p, it produces 53 FPS, and at 4K, it falls to 31 FPS. The performance penalty from High to Ultra is disproportionately large, suggesting that the preset enables effects that this GPU cannot efficiently handle. For 4K gaming, Medium is the recommended choice, as it provides the only playable frame rates at that resolution. For 1440p, Medium or High both work well, with the choice depending on whether the user prefers higher frame rates or better visuals.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination ranks 1672 out of 2938 tested combos in Greedfall. This places it in the 43rd percentile of all combinations, indicating that it performs below the median for this game. The ranking reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning (59th percentile among GPUs) and the CPU's strong performance (83rd percentile among CPUs), suggesting the GPU holds the combo back from higher rankings.

The rank is somewhat surprising given the CPU's capabilities, but it aligns with the measured FPS data. The RX 9060's aggregate benchmark score of 16014 places it just below the RTX 3060 Ti, and in Greedfall, this level of GPU performance is insufficient for top-tier rankings at higher resolutions. The combo's strength lies in 1080p performance, where it achieves excellent frame rates, but the 4K results drag down its overall standing. For users with 1080p or 1440p monitors, this ranking may understate the actual experience, as the FPS at those resolutions is strong. However, for 4K gaming, the combo's ranking reflects its limitations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance. The Low preset averages 167 FPS, providing maximum frame rates for competitive or fast-paced play. Medium settings achieve 131 FPS with a minimum of 112 FPS and a maximum of 151 FPS, offering excellent smoothness. High settings average 119 FPS, still well above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset drops to 76 FPS, which remains playable but represents a significant performance cost for the visual upgrade.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the GPU starting to work harder. Low settings hit 116 FPS, Medium reaches 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 105 FPS, and High maintains 83 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 53 FPS, indicating that this resolution is the practical limit for maximum settings. The gap between Medium and High is 8 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 30 FPS, highlighting the Ultra preset's heavy cost.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low settings produce 69 FPS, which is the only 4K preset exceeding 60 FPS. Medium settings average 54 FPS with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS, providing borderline playability. High settings drop to 49 FPS, and Ultra falls to 31 FPS, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a 55% performance reduction, compared to a 54% reduction at 1080p and a 54% reduction at 1440p, demonstrating consistent GPU-bound behavior at the highest resolution.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2990 MHz MHz
TDP 132 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Greedfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 69.0
3840x2160 Medium 54.0
3840x2160 High 49.0
3840x2160 Ultra 31.0
2560x1440 Low 116.0
2560x1440 Medium 91.0
2560x1440 High 83.0
2560x1440 Ultra 53.0
1920x1080 Low 167.0
1920x1080 Medium 131.0
1920x1080 High 119.0
1920x1080 Ultra 76.0

Greedfall with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs

See how Greedfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Greedfall with RX 9060 + Other CPUs

See how Greedfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RX 9060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.