Fortnite

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is a well-balanced mid-range combination for Fortnite, landing at rank 1064 out of 1564 tested combos in this game. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, which is a practical position given that the GPU is an older Turing design and the CPU is a capable modern desktop processor. The data indicates that this pairing is heavily influenced by the graphics card at higher resolutions, while the CPU provides a solid foundation at lower settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1064 out of 1564 tested combinations places it in the 32nd percentile of all tested pairings for Fortnite. This is not a top-tier result, but it is far from the bottom of the list. The ranking suggests that while this setup can run the game, it will not be setting records for frame rates, particularly in demanding scenarios. The position is a direct reflection of the GPU's performance ceiling; the RTX 2060 SUPER sits at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs tested, which is a modest standing. The CPU, in contrast, performs much better relative to its peers, sitting at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. This discrepancy shows that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. In practical terms, the combo is positioned for 1080p and 1440p gaming with adjustable settings, but it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K, especially on higher presets. The data shows a clear trend where the combo's rank is dragged down by the GPU's age and performance class.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-13400F provides a strong computational base for this combo. It features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This is a Raptor Lake architecture processor on a 10 nm process, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU's benchmark results are impressive for its class, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21279 and a single-core score of 3004. In the database, its average benchmark score of 25236 places it just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D. This means the 13400F is effectively on par with those processors in general compute tasks.

For Fortnite specifically, this CPU has ample headroom. The game is not particularly demanding on multi-core performance, and the 13400F's 16 threads are more than enough to handle the game's logic and physics. The high single-thread score of 3634 in Passmark is more relevant here, as Fortnite tends to rely on fewer cores for its main game loop. The data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 206 FPS, which is a strong indicator that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this scenario. Even at 4K with Low settings, the CPU can push the GPU to 69.4 FPS, which shows that the processor is capable of feeding the graphics card even at lower resolutions where CPU load is relatively higher. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache also helps with game asset streaming. In summary, the CPU is a robust performer that will not hold this combo back in Fortnite, leaving the GPU as the primary constraint.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is the defining component in this pairing. It is a Turing architecture GPU on a 12 nm process, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its clocks are set at a base of 1470 MHz and a boost of 1650 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 2176 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It also includes 34 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, which are not heavily utilized in Fortnite's standard rendering. The GPU's benchmark results show a Passmark G3D score of 16462, which places it at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN, which it beats by only 0.3%, and it trails the RTX 2070 by 0.5%. This indicates that the RTX 2060 SUPER is a solid, but not exceptional, performer in the current database.

In Fortnite, the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for the game's textures at most settings, but the card's raw compute power limits its performance at higher resolutions. The data shows a clear drop-off as resolution and settings increase. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 206 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra, it drops to 73.1 FPS. This is a 64% reduction in frame rate, which is a direct result of the GPU's limited shader and texture throughput. At 4K, the GPU struggles even more, with a Low setting average of 69.4 FPS and a High setting average of 40.9 FPS. The card's FP32 performance of 7.181 TFLOPS is modest by modern standards, and it shows in these results. The GPU is the clear bottleneck, and the data suggests that users should target lower settings at higher resolutions to maintain playable frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of this combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the results are solid for competitive play. On Low settings, the combo averages 206 FPS, which is excellent for a high-refresh-rate monitor. Medium settings drop this to 147.2 FPS, still very playable. High settings yield 111.7 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 73.1 FPS. This shows a clear scaling pattern where each preset tier costs a significant number of frames. At 2560x1440, the performance degrades noticeably. Low settings produce an average of 132.5 FPS, which is still good for 1440p. Medium settings drop to 90.2 FPS, High settings to 74.3 FPS, and Ultra to 49.1 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p is borderline playable, but it is close to the threshold where frame pacing issues become noticeable.

At 3840x2160, the combo is clearly not designed for high-refresh gaming. Low settings average 69.4 FPS, which is playable on a standard 60 Hz monitor. Medium settings drop to 47.6 FPS, High to 40.9 FPS, and Ultra to 27.3 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is not a viable gaming experience. The data shows that the sweet spot for this combo is 1080p, where it can push high frame rates on all settings except Ultra. At 1440p, it is best to stay on Low or Medium settings to maintain frame rates above 90 FPS. The pattern is consistent: the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to use with this combo for competitive play?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with Low settings provides the highest average frame rate at 206 FPS, making it the best choice for competitive play where high refresh rates are critical.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fortnite?

A: It can run the game, but with limitations. At 4K with Low settings, the combo averages 69.4 FPS, but at High settings, it drops to 40.9 FPS, and at Ultra, it falls to 27.3 FPS. Playable frame rates are only possible on Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25236, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H and 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D. It is effectively on par with both.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 19774, which is 0.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and 0.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings average 132.5 FPS, while Ultra settings average 49.1 FPS. This represents a 63% reduction in frame rate when moving from Low to Ultra.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this combo for Fortnite?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the CPU can drive the frame rate to 206 FPS, but the GPU cannot maintain that performance at higher settings, dropping to 73.1 FPS at Ultra.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience for this combo depends on the target resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 1080p 144 Hz or higher monitor, the Low preset is the clear winner, delivering 206 FPS. This maximizes competitive advantage. If visual quality is more important, the Medium preset at 147.2 FPS is still excellent and offers a better-looking image without sacrificing much performance. The High preset at 111.7 FPS is also viable, but the Ultra preset at 73.1 FPS is the least favorable option, as it drops below the 100 FPS mark.

For 1440p users, the Low preset is the only one that guarantees a high-refresh experience at 132.5 FPS. Medium at 90.2 FPS is acceptable for a 90 Hz monitor, but High at 74.3 FPS and Ultra at 49.1 FPS are not ideal. At 4K, only the Low preset at 69.4 FPS is playable, and it is best suited for a 60 Hz display. The Medium preset at 47.6 FPS and below are not recommended for a smooth experience. In summary, the data recommends using Low settings for competitive play at any resolution, with Medium as a reasonable compromise for visual fidelity at 1080p and 1440p. High and Ultra presets are only viable at 1080p, and even then, they do not provide the frame rates necessary for high-refresh gaming. The measured rows clearly show that this combo is best utilized with lower settings to unlock its full potential.