Fivem
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 115 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 54 | 68 | 86 |
| 1440p QHD | 76 | 98 | 122 | 155 |
| 1080p Full HD | 115 | 148 | 186 | 235 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-12700KF and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combination delivers a wide spread of performance in Fivem, scaling from high refresh rate territory at 1080p down to playable but demanding 4K. The data shows a clear trend: as resolution increases, the frame rate drops significantly, revealing a shift in the bottleneck from the CPU at lower resolutions to the GPU at higher ones. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo hits 235 FPS, but at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, it falls to 42 FPS—a massive reduction that highlights the GPU’s limitations at the highest fidelity.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data demonstrates how Fivem responds to resolution changes with this hardware pairing. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average frame rate drops from 148 FPS to 98 FPS—a 34% reduction. This indicates that even at 1440p, the system is still able to leverage the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance, but the GPU is starting to take on more of the workload. The scaling continues at 4K, where the same High preset yields 54 FPS, a further 45% decline from the 1440p result. This steep drop-off shows that at 3840x2160, the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT becomes the primary limiting factor, as its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus can only process so many pixels per frame.
The pattern is consistent across all settings. At Low, the frame rate goes from 235 FPS at 1080p to 155 FPS at 1440p and then to 86 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 34%, while the 1440p to 4K drop is 45%. This growing percentage gap suggests that the CPU, with its 12 cores and 20 threads, is more than capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes the ceiling as resolution increases. At Medium settings, the frame rates are 186 FPS, 122 FPS, and 68 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K respectively. The 1080p to 1440p decline is 34%, and the 1440p to 4K decline is 44%, which mirrors the High preset’s behavior.
For Ultra settings, the data shows 115 FPS at 1080p, 76 FPS at 1440p, and 42 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 34%, and the 1440p to 4K drop is 45%. This consistency across all four presets—a roughly one-third reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a further two-fifths reduction from 1440p to 4K—indicates that the scaling is largely resolution-driven rather than settings-driven. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz and its 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 suggest it can maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s 37.32 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the ceiling once 4K is reached.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for high refresh rate gaming with this combo?
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo consistently exceeds 144 FPS. At Low settings it reaches 235 FPS, at Medium it hits 186 FPS, and at High it achieves 148 FPS. Even at Ultra, the 115 FPS average is above 100 FPS, making 1080p the clear choice for competitive or fast-paced play.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?
A: Yes, but with compromises. At 4K, the average frame rates are 86 FPS on Low, 68 FPS on Medium, 54 FPS on High, and 42 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at 4K shows a minimum of 58 FPS, which is still playable, but the Ultra preset will likely feel sluggish. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is not the issue; rather, the 256-bit memory bus and 2430 MHz boost clock limit raw throughput.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, the Intel Core i7-12700KF’s performance is crucial. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2065 and 8-thread score of 7211 indicate strong single and multi-threaded capabilities. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system produces 235 FPS, which is likely CPU-bound, as the GPU has less work to do. The 5.00 GHz boost clock helps maintain high frame rates in Fivem’s CPU-intensive multiplayer scenarios.
Q: Is the RX 7800 XT a bottleneck at 4K?
A: Yes. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a 45% drop in frame rate across all settings, which is a strong indicator of GPU limitation. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24176 and its 51st percentile ranking among all GPUs confirm that while it is a capable card, it is not designed for maxed-out 4K gaming in this title. The 42 FPS at 4K Ultra is the lowest recorded result.
Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 155 FPS, while Ultra drops to 76 FPS. That is a 51% performance loss for the highest fidelity. The Medium preset at 122 FPS offers a balanced point, with a minimum of 104 FPS, which is smoother than the Ultra’s average. The High preset at 98 FPS sits between Medium and Ultra.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 1235th out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the top third of all systems. This suggests that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it outperforms the majority of tested hardware. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking versus all CPUs supports its strong role, while the GPU’s 51st percentile shows it is an average performer relative to other graphics cards.
How This Combo Ranks
In the benchmark database, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT holds the 1235th position out of 3707 total tested combos for Fivem. This puts it in the 67th percentile of all configurations, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the systems tested. The rank reflects a balance between the CPU and GPU, where the CPU is a strong contributor but the GPU holds the system back from higher placements.
The CPU itself ranks in the 85th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35365. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700T with an average score of 35403 (a 0.1% difference) and the Intel Core i5-13600T at 35305 (a 0.2% difference). This shows the i7-12700KF is competitively positioned in raw processing power. The GPU, however, ranks in the 51st percentile against all GPUs, with an average score of 11627. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 at 11680 (0.5% lower) and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT at 11842 (1.8% higher). This places the RX 7800 XT in the middle of the pack, which explains the overall combo rank being lower than the CPU’s individual standing.
The measured FPS data aligns with this ranking. At 1080p, the combo achieves frame rates that would satisfy most gamers, but at 4K, the scores drop to levels that are only suitable for less demanding play. The combo’s rank is not a reflection of a weak CPU, but rather the GPU’s inability to sustain high frame rates at higher resolutions. For a system aiming for 1440p gaming, this rank is solid, but for 4K enthusiasts, it falls short of the top echelons.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates are provided for three resolutions and four settings, giving a complete picture of performance. At 1920x1080, the Low preset produces the highest average at 235 FPS. The Medium preset follows at 186 FPS, with a minimum of 158 FPS and a maximum of 214 FPS. High yields 148 FPS, and Ultra drops to 115 FPS. These numbers suggest that at 1080p, the system is well-suited for high refresh rate monitors, with even the Ultra preset maintaining above 100 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates are lower but still respectable. Low averages 155 FPS, which is excellent for 1440p. Medium averages 122 FPS, with a minimum of 104 FPS and a maximum of 141 FPS. High achieves 98 FPS, and Ultra falls to 76 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 104 FPS is notable, as it indicates a stable experience without significant frame drops. The Ultra preset at 76 FPS is playable but may not be ideal for fast-paced action.
At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low averages 86 FPS, which is the only 4K preset to exceed 60 FPS. Medium averages 68 FPS, with a minimum of 58 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS. High drops to 54 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 42 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 58 FPS is close to the 60 FPS target, but the High and Ultra presets will likely experience noticeable stuttering. The data indicates that 4K gaming is possible, but only at lower settings for a smooth experience.
The pattern across all presets is consistent: the gap between Low and Ultra is roughly 50% at every resolution. At 1080p, the difference is 235 FPS versus 115 FPS (51% lower). At 1440p, it is 155 FPS versus 76 FPS (51% lower). At 4K, it is 86 FPS versus 42 FPS (51% lower). This uniformity suggests that the settings have a consistent impact on the GPU workload, regardless of resolution.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset is the most reliable choice across all resolutions. At 1080p, it delivers 186 FPS with a minimum of 158 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience on high refresh rate monitors. At 1440p, the Medium preset yields 122 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS, which is above the 100 FPS threshold for most gamers. Even at 4K, Medium averages 68 FPS with a minimum of 58 FPS, making it the only preset that stays close to a consistent 60 FPS at that resolution.
The High preset is a viable option for those prioritizing visuals over frame rate, but it comes with a noticeable cost. At 1080p, High delivers 148 FPS, which is still smooth. At 1440p, it drops to 98 FPS, which is acceptable but not ideal for competitive play. At 4K, High averages 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS standard and may result in noticeable judder. The Ultra preset is only recommended for 1080p, where the 115 FPS average is still high, but at 1440p and 4K, the 76 FPS and 42 FPS results respectively are too low for a satisfying experience.
The Low preset is best suited for maximum frame rates, particularly at 1080p where it hits 235 FPS. At 1440p, Low still delivers 155 FPS, making it a strong choice for esports-style play. At 4K, Low’s 86 FPS is the only setting that exceeds 60 FPS, so it is the recommended option for 4K users who want a smooth experience. However, the visual fidelity loss is significant, and the Medium preset at 4K offers a better balance with its 68 FPS average.
In summary, Medium is the sweet spot for this combo, providing playable frame rates at all resolutions with a minimum of 58 FPS at 4K. High is acceptable for 1080p and 1440p, but not 4K. Ultra should be reserved for 1080p only. Low is the fallback for 4K users who prioritize smoothness over graphics.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700KF plays a critical role in this combo’s performance, particularly at lower resolutions. With 12 cores and 20 threads, it offers substantial multi-threading capability, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838 and Geekbench multicore score of 14367. However, in Fivem, a multiplayer game that often relies on single-threaded performance, the CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz and 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 are more relevant. These numbers suggest the CPU can handle the game’s logic and physics calculations without becoming a bottleneck at 1080p.
The CPU’s 25 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache help reduce memory latency, which is beneficial for a game that frequently streams assets in multiplayer environments. The PassMark single-thread score of 3984 further confirms strong single-core performance. At 1080p, the data shows frame rates up to 235 FPS, which would be difficult to achieve if the CPU were limiting the system. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2065 indicates that even with just two threads, the CPU excels, which is important for games that are not fully optimized for multi-threading.
Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU’s average benchmark score of 35365 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-13700T at 35403 (0.1% lower) and the Intel Core i5-13600T at 35305 (0.2% higher). This places the i7-12700KF in a competitive position, with performance that is effectively on par with newer 13th-gen parts. The 85th percentile ranking versus all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors, ensuring that the GPU is the primary limiting factor in most scenarios.
The CPU’s architecture, Alder Lake, and 10 nm process node contribute to its efficiency and performance. The 125 W TDP is reasonable for a desktop part, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the stock boost clock of 5.00 GHz is already high. In Fivem, the CPU’s role is to maintain high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, and the data confirms it does so effectively. The bottleneck only becomes apparent at 4K, where the GPU’s workload dominates and the CPU’s performance is less impactful. Overall, the i7-12700KF is a strong partner for the RX 7800 XT, ensuring that the system is not held back by processing power in most gaming scenarios.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700KF
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 86.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 68.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 42.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 155.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 122.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 98.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 76.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 235.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 186.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 148.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 115.0 |
Fivem with ii7-12700KF + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RX 7800 XT + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700KF + RX 7800 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.