Fivem

The Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 combination delivers a playable but scaling-challenged experience in Fivem, with performance that drops sharply as resolution increases. The data shows this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can push high frame rates, while 4K presents a significant strain on the system. Benchmark results reveal that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU's six-core, six-thread design provides adequate but not exceptional support for the game's workload.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data demonstrates a clear and steep decline in performance as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At the "High" settings preset, the average frame rate drops from 82 FPS at 1920x1080 to 54 FPS at 2560x1440, a substantial reduction of approximately 34%. This trend continues at 4K, where the average FPS plummets to just 30 frames per second. This indicates that the GTX 1070, with its 8 GB of GDDR5 memory and 256-bit memory bus, is increasingly overwhelmed by the pixel count at higher resolutions.

This scaling pattern is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario. The data strongly suggests that at 2560x1440 and especially at 3840x2160, the graphics card is the limiting component. The i5-9400's performance, while capable, is not the primary constraint at these higher resolutions. For example, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 6629 and single-core score of 935 are respectable, but they do not scale with resolution; the workload shifts to the GPU's pixel and texture processing power. The GPU's texture rate of 202.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 107.7 GPixel/s are the metrics that determine how quickly it can fill the screen.

The scaling isn't linear, however. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant, but the drop from 1440p to 4K is even more severe. For instance, at the "Medium" preset, the average FPS falls from 103 at 1080p to 68 at 1440p, and then to 38 at 4K. This shows that the gap between 1080p and 1440p is about 34 FPS, while the gap between 1440p and 4K is 30 FPS. This non-linear scaling suggests that the GPU is hitting a hard limit at 4K. The GTX 1070's 8 GB of VRAM, while sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, may also be a limiting factor at 4K with higher settings, as the memory bandwidth of 256.3 GB/s becomes a bottleneck for the larger frame buffers.

In contrast, the CPU's role appears more static across resolutions. The i5-9400's performance, as measured by its Cinebench scores, does not change; it is a constant variable. This means that the FPS difference between resolutions is almost entirely due to the GPU's workload. The results clearly show that the combination is far more capable at 1080p, where the CPU and GPU can work in better balance, than at 4K, where the GPU is overwhelmed.

How This Combo Ranks

In the comprehensive list of tested combinations, this pairing of the Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 achieves a rank of 3063 out of 3707 combos. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, with a percentile ranking that indicates it is in the 47th percentile for both the CPU and GPU individually. This mid-range positioning is consistent with the performance data, which shows it is a competent but not top-tier combination for Fivem.

The CPU's performance relative to its direct rivals is a key factor in this ranking. The i5-9400 has an average benchmark score of 2167, and its nearest rivals have very similar scores. For instance, the Intel Core i7-1068NG7 has an average score of 2162, a negligible difference of -0.2%. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has an average score of 2158, a difference of 0.4%. This shows that the i5-9400's processing power is very much at the entry level for modern gaming, and it does not provide a significant advantage over its closest competitors. The processor's single-core performance, as measured by the Geekbench single-core score of 1389, is adequate but not outstanding, which can matter in a multiplayer game like Fivem when handling many networked entities.

The GPU also sits at a similar level. Its average benchmark score is 9780, and its nearest rivals are extremely close in performance. The AMD FirePro W5000 has a score of 9803, a difference of -0.2%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M has a score of 9832, a difference of -0.5%. This indicates that the GTX 1070 is not a high-end card by today's standards, and its performance is matched by several other professional and mobile parts. This is reflected in the combo's ranking, where it doesn't stand out as a high performer but is also not in the lowest tier.

The data shows that the combination's rank is a direct result of the individual components' mid-range standing. It's not a pairing that will top charts, but it's also not one that will be at the bottom. The 47th percentile standing for both the CPU and GPU suggests a system that is balanced but lacking in high-end muscle.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience for this hardware combination is achieved at 1080p with "High" settings. This preset delivers an average of 82 FPS, which is a smooth and responsive frame rate for a multiplayer title. The "High" preset also offers a good visual quality without the performance cost of "Ultra". Moving to "Ultra" at 1080p drops the average to 64 FPS, which is still playable but represents a significant performance hit for what may be a marginal visual improvement.

For a higher visual quality, the "Medium" preset at 1080p is also a viable option. It provides an average of 103 FPS, which is even smoother than "High", and it will likely offer a more consistent visual experience. However, the "High" preset is suggested as the best balance of visual fidelity and performance. The data shows that at 1080p, the system can handle all four presets, with "Low" hitting 131 FPS and "Ultra" hitting 64 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the system can still maintain playable frame rates. The "High" preset delivers an average of 54 FPS, and "Medium" is a more comfortable 68 FPS. For a smoother experience, "Medium" at 1440p is a better choice, as it stays above 60 FPS. The "Low" preset reaches an average of 86 FPS, which is also a viable choice for competitive play. The "Ultra" preset at 1440p falls to 42 FPS, which is less than ideal for a fast-paced multiplayer game.

4K resolution is not recommended for this combination. Even on the "Low" preset, the system only manages an average of 48 FPS, which is below the ideal standard for smooth gameplay. The "High" preset at 4K is barely playable at 30 FPS, and "Ultra" is a stuttery 23 FPS. The data suggests that players should avoid 4K unless they are willing to accept significant compromises in visual quality and smoothness. The best overall experience for this system is to stay at 1080p with a "High" or "Medium" preset, or to drop to 1440p with a "Medium" preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at the system's capabilities across all resolutions and settings.

1920x1080:

• Low: The average frame rate is 131 FPS, which is a very high performance. This shows that the system is not stressed at all at this resolution with low settings.
• Medium: The average frame rate is 103 FPS, with a minimum of 88 FPS and a maximum of 119 FPS. This is a strong performance, showing good frame time consistency.
• High: The average frame rate is 82 FPS. This is a very good performance for a high visual quality setting.
• Ultra: The average frame rate is 64 FPS. This is a playable frame rate, but it shows a steep drop from the "High" preset, indicating that the "Ultra" settings are very demanding on the GPU.

2560x1440:

• Low: The average frame rate is 86 FPS. This is a smooth experience and a good choice for fast-paced gaming.
• Medium: The average frame rate is 68 FPS, with a minimum of 58 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS. This is a solid frame rate for the resolution, but the minimum shows it can dip close to 60 FPS.
• High: The average frame rate is 54 FPS. This is a playable frame rate, but it is below the 60 FPS threshold that many players prefer.
• Ultra: The average frame rate is 42 FPS. This is a demanding setting that can cause noticeable stutter in a fast-paced multiplayer game.

3840x2160:

• Low: The average frame rate is 48 FPS. This is a low frame rate that is not ideal for a smooth experience.
• Medium: The average frame rate is 38 FPS, with a minimum of 32 FPS and a maximum of 43 FPS. This shows very inconsistent frame pacing, which could lead to a poor experience.
• High: The average frame rate is 30 FPS. This is a very low frame rate, often considered the minimum for playability, but it will not feel smooth.
• Ultra: The average frame rate is 23 FPS. This is not a playable frame rate for a multiplayer game, as it will be very unresponsive.

The data reveals a clear trend: the system delivers playable performance at 1080p across all settings, with "Low" and "Medium" being ideal for high refresh. At 1440p, only "Low" and "Medium" provide consistently smooth experience. At 4K, no setting is truly playable, with the system struggling to maintain even 30 FPS on "High".

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is the central component for this game's performance. Its 8 GB of GDDR5 memory is a defining feature. The data shows that at 4K with "Ultra" settings, the system drops to 23 FPS, which is likely due to the massive memory bandwidth and capacity requirements of 4K textures. The 8 GB capacity is likely a limiting factor at 4K, as the game may need to swap textures out of memory, causing the severe frame drops. The memory bandwidth of 256.25 GB/s is also stressed at this resolution, as it has to move data for a 2160p frame buffer. The 8 GB capacity is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, where the game's memory footprint is lower.

The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 1506 MHz and a boost of 1683 MHz, are also relevant. The boost clock is the speed at which the GPU will run under load, and it shows the card's ability to sustain performance. The pixel rate of 107.7 GPixel/s and texture rate of 202.0 GTexel/s are the raw processing capabilities of the card. These specifications directly determine how many pixels and textures the GPU can process per second. This is why the performance scales so poorly with resolution. The higher the resolution, the more pixels and textures the GPU has to process, and the GTX 1070's capabilities are quickly exceeded.

The data shows that the GTX 1070 is a mid-range GPU in the current landscape. Its percentile rank is 47%, and its nearest rivals are all within a few points of its average score. This means that it lacks the raw power to handle 4K gaming, but it has enough power for 1080p and 1440p. The 8 GB of VRAM is a great asset, allowing for high textures at 1080p and 1440p without hitting memory limits. The GPU's role is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, but it is not a weak card; it is simply designed for a resolution that is below 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The data strongly supports 1920x1080 as the best resolution. It delivers high frame rates across all settings, with "Low" at 131 FPS and "High" at 82 FPS, providing a smooth and responsive experience. 2560x1440 is also playable, but 4K should be avoided.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The benchmark results show this is not a viable option. At 4K, the "High" preset averages 30 FPS, and "Ultra" is only 23 FPS. While the "Low" preset reaches 48 FPS, the overall performance at 4K is below the standard for a smooth multiplayer experience.

Q: How does the GTX 1070's memory affect performance in Fivem?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the memory capacity is likely a bottleneck. The high memory and bandwidth requirements of 4K cause the system to struggle, leading to the low frame rates observed.

Q: What is the performance difference between the "High" and "Ultra" presets at 1080p?

A: The "High" preset delivers an average of 82 FPS, while "Ultra" drops to 64 FPS. This is a difference of 18 FPS, showing that the "Ultra" preset has a significant performance cost. For a more competitive and smoother experience, "High" is a better choice.

Q: How does this combo's performance rank among all tested combinations?

A: This combo ranks 3063 out of 3707 tested combinations. This places it in the lower half of the performance chart, which is consistent with its component scores. Both the CPU and GPU are in the 47th percentile of their respective categories.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more of a bottleneck at 1440p?

A: The data indicates that the GPU is the main bottleneck at 1440p. The CPU's performance is consistent across resolutions, but the GPU's workload increases with resolution. At 1440p, the GPU struggles to maintain high frame rates at "High" and "Ultra" settings, showing it is the limiting factor.