Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 180 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 67 | 82 | 109 | 136 |
| 1440p QHD | 121 | 150 | 189 | 243 |
| 1080p Full HD | 178 | 231 | 291 | 368 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, In-Depth Analysis
The data for Fivem on this Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination reveals a system of immense raw power, yet the benchmark results show that game settings and resolution heavily dictate where that power is utilized. The measured FPS figures across the twelve tested configurations provide a clear picture of a system that can dominate at lower resolutions but faces a different bottleneck at 4K. This analysis breaks down the performance scaling, the roles of the CPU and GPU, and what the numbers mean for a player looking to optimize their experience.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1080p to 4K showcases a dramatic shift in performance that highlights the changing balance between the CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system produces an average of 368 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same Low preset drops that figure to 242.7 FPS, a significant 34% reduction. Pushing further to 3840x2160 at Low yields 136 FPS, which is a 63% drop from the 1080p result. This steep decline indicates that at 1080p, the frame rate is likely being limited by the CPU’s ability to process the game’s logic, while the GPU has ample headroom. As resolution increases, the rendering load on the GPU grows, and it becomes the primary constraint.
The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings. For High settings, the FPS drops from 230.8 at 1080p to 150 at 1440p, and then to 82.4 at 4K. The Ultra preset shows the same trend: 177.6 FPS at 1080p, 120.5 at 1440p, and 67.4 at 4K. The data implies that the RTX 4090, with its massive compute resources, is underutilized at 1080p, where the Core i5-14600KF is working harder to keep up. The percentage drop between 1440p and 4K is more pronounced than the drop between 1080p and 1440p, suggesting that the GPU is becoming exponentially more stressed as pixel count increases. The 4K results, particularly the 67.4 FPS average on Ultra, suggest a more balanced, GPU-bound workload where the system’s full capabilities are being tested.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is an undisputed heavyweight, and the benchmark data confirms it can push very high frame rates even in a demanding multiplayer title like Fivem. Its 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth are key assets, providing the data throughput necessary for high-resolution textures and complex scenes without stuttering. The GPU’s architecture, Ada Lovelace, with 16,384 shading units, is clearly capable of handling the game’s rendering demands, as evidenced by the 136 FPS average at 4K Low settings. The boost clock of 2520 MHz and the 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance give it the raw compute power to render the detailed world of Fivem.
However, the data also reveals that this power is not always fully harnessed. At 1080p, the GPU is effectively idling much of the time, waiting for the CPU to feed it instructions. The gap between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p is 190.4 FPS (368 vs 177.6), showcasing how much headroom the GPU has. The GPU’s role becomes more critical as resolution climbs. At 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra is 68.6 FPS (136 vs 67.4), showing that the GPU is now the limiting factor. The RTX 4090’s performance percentile of 91 and its average benchmark score of 66473 place it near the top, but its nearest rivals in synthetic tests are professional-grade cards like the Tesla T4 and Quadro P6000, which are not optimized for gaming in the same way. This indicates that in a real-world gaming scenario, the 4090 is operating at a level that few other consumer cards can match, but its full potential is only realized when the resolution is high enough to saturate its processing units.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-14600KF plays a critical role in Fivem, particularly at lower resolutions where the game’s simulation and multiplayer logic take precedence. With 14 cores and 20 threads, the processor has a strong foundation for handling the numerous background tasks and player interactions that occur in a multiplayer environment. Its boost clock of 5.30 GHz is a major asset, as single-thread performance is often crucial for game logic. The CPU’s benchmark results support this, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4643 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2778, indicating excellent per-core speed.
The measured FPS data strongly suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p. The fact that Low settings yield 368 FPS while Ultra yields 177.6 FPS at the same resolution points to the CPU being the bottleneck. The CPU is processing the game’s core loop and drawing calls, and when the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can issue commands, the frame rate plateaus. As resolution increases, the CPU’s workload relative to the GPU’s decreases. At 4K, the CPU is no longer the primary constraint; it has enough time to prepare frames while the GPU is busy rendering the more complex image. The CPU’s overall performance is strong, with an average benchmark score of 49367 and a percentile of 93, placing it slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 0.6% and just 0.4% behind its sibling, the Core i5-14600K. This shows that the i5-14600KF is not a weak link, but rather a powerful partner that is simply outpaced by the sheer speed of the RTX 4090 at lower resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Why is the FPS difference so large between 1080p and 4K on Low settings?
A: At 1080p Low, the system hits 368 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 136 FPS. This is because the GPU, the RTX 4090, is underutilized at 1080p, and the CPU becomes the limiting factor. At 4K, the GPU’s rendering workload increases dramatically, making it the new bottleneck and causing the frame rate to drop.
Q: Is the Core i5-14600KF strong enough for this GPU?
A: The data shows the CPU is a very capable partner. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores a 93rd percentile. However, in Fivem at 1080p, the frame rate is likely CPU-limited, as shown by the 368 FPS on Low. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, indicating the CPU has enough power to feed it in that scenario.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combination in Fivem?
A: For high refresh rate gaming, 2560x1440 appears to be a sweet spot. On High settings, it delivers 150 FPS, and on Low settings, it reaches 242.7 FPS. This provides a substantial visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining very high, smooth frame rates. 4K is feasible, but it maxes out around 136 FPS on Low and 82.4 FPS on High.
Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 67.4 FPS, while High averages 82.4 FPS, a difference of 15 FPS. The data suggests that the visual gains from Ultra may not be worth the significant performance cost at this resolution.
Q: Is the RTX 4090's performance in Fivem representative of its overall standing?
A: The RTX 4090 has a high average benchmark score of 66473 and a 91st percentile ranking. However, its performance in Fivem is heavily influenced by the CPU. At 1080p, it is not fully utilized, but at 4K, it demonstrates its strength, achieving frame rates that would be challenging for most other GPUs.
Q: Should I use Low settings to get the absolute highest FPS?
A: If maximizing frame rate is the goal, Low settings at 1080p gives 368 FPS. However, this likely creates a CPU bottleneck and may diminish visual quality. A more balanced option would be Medium at 1440p, which yields 188.7 FPS and likely offers a better balance between visuals and performance.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend entirely on the user's display and priorities. For players with a 1080p 240Hz monitor, the High preset at 1920x1080, which delivers 230.8 FPS, is an excellent choice. It provides a rich visual experience while keeping the frame rate high enough to fully utilize a high refresh rate display. The Ultra preset at this resolution, at 177.6 FPS, is also viable but may represent a point of diminishing returns for the extra performance cost.
For those on a 1440p 144Hz or 165Hz monitor, the High preset at 2560x1440 is the standout recommendation. The 150 FPS average is above the refresh rate of most 144Hz monitors and offers a great balance of image quality and smoothness. The Medium preset at this resolution, at 188.7 FPS, is a strong alternative if a higher frame rate is desired. The data does not favor the Ultra preset at this resolution, as the 120.5 FPS average, while playable, is a noticeable step down from the High preset for a likely marginal visual improvement.
At 4K, the best experience for smooth gameplay is the Low preset, which yields 136 FPS, though this sacrifices visual fidelity. The High preset at 82.4 FPS is a better compromise for visual quality, provided the user has a 60Hz or 120Hz display. The Ultra preset at 67.4 FPS is on the edge of playability for fast-paced multiplayer and is not recommended for competitive play. The data suggests that for most users, 1440p High offers the best all-around experience, balancing the CPU and GPU loads for a high and stable frame rate.
Measured FPS Breakdown
This section details the average FPS for every resolution and settings combination measured in the benchmark.
1920x1080 (1080p):
- Low: 368.0 FPS
- Medium: 290.6 FPS
- High: 230.8 FPS
- Ultra: 177.6 FPS
2560x1440 (1440p):
- Low: 242.7 FPS
- Medium: 188.7 FPS
- High: 150.0 FPS
- Ultra: 120.5 FPS
3840x2160 (4K):
- Low: 136.0 FPS
- Medium: 108.7 FPS
- High: 82.4 FPS
- Ultra: 67.4 FPS
The data reveals a clear hierarchy. The 1080p Low result of 368 FPS is the highest score recorded, showcasing the system’s absolute peak when the CPU is the main driver. The 4K Ultra result of 67.4 FPS is the lowest, where the GPU is working at its hardest. The scaling between each preset is consistent across all resolutions, with a clear performance drop as settings are increased. This data provides a definitive map of what to expect from this hardware combination, with no min or max FPS recorded to give a sense of frame time variance.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader context of all tested combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 holds a rank of 30 out of 1792 total combinations. This placement in the top 1.7% of all tested systems confirms that it is one of the most powerful configurations available for this game. The high ranking confirms the sheer strength of both components. The RTX 4090’s position as a top-tier GPU, despite its end-of-life production status, ensures that it can handle the most demanding graphical scenarios.
The CPU’s performance is also a key contributor. Its 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, and its proximity to rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (0.6% ahead) and the Core i5-14600K (0.4% behind), shows that it is not a bottleneck in the traditional sense. The rank of 30 suggests that only 29 other configurations, which likely include more expensive CPUs like the Core i9 series or potentially even more exotic setups, are able to outperform this pairing in Fivem. This ranking, combined with the measured FPS data, indicates that a user with this system is at the pinnacle of performance for this title, with the only limitations being the inherent scaling of the game engine itself at lower resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600KF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 136.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 108.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 82.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 67.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 242.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 188.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 150.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 120.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 368.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 290.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 230.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 177.6 |
Fivem with ii5-14600KF + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RTX 4090 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600KF + RTX 4090
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.