Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and AMD Radeon 890M combination delivers a playable but constrained experience in Fivem, with the integrated graphics clearly acting as the primary bottleneck across all tested resolutions. The data shows a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 processor paired with an RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU, producing frame rates that range from a usable 79 FPS at 1080p Low down to a slideshow-like 14 FPS at 4K Ultra. This combo ranks 2823 out of 3005 tested combinations for Fivem, placing it in the lower quartile of systems, yet the CPU’s raw multi-threaded muscle ensures that the frame rate ceiling is dictated almost entirely by the GPU rather than the processor.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of running Fivem at 1080p?

A: Yes, 1080p is the only resolution where this system delivers consistently playable results. The measured data shows 79 FPS at Low settings, 62 FPS at Medium, and 50 FPS at High, with Ultra dropping to 38 FPS. For a multiplayer game like Fivem, the Medium preset at 1080p offers the best balance, as it maintains an average above 60 FPS while keeping visual quality reasonable.

Q: How does the CPU’s performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 76,212 in average benchmark performance, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. It is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, which scores 76,155, representing a 0.1% difference. It is also within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (75,779) and sits 0.4% above the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (76,492) and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76,513). This indicates the processor is not the limiting factor in Fivem.

Q: What is the GPU’s standing relative to other graphics solutions?

A: The Radeon 890M holds the 45th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 9,210. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (9,221, 0.1% faster), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (9,273, 0.7% faster), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 (9,294, 0.9% faster), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M (9,302, 1% faster). This places the integrated solution roughly on par with a decade-old discrete graphics card.

Q: Does the CPU’s integrated graphics differ from the Radeon 890M?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 8945HX’s processor specification lists an integrated Radeon 610M, while the measured FPS data uses the AMD Radeon 890M as the GPU. The 890M is a separate integrated part based on RDNA 3.5 architecture, featuring 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operations pipelines, with a boost clock of 2,900 MHz.

Q: What happens to frame rates when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: The performance drop is severe. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 50 at 1080p to 33 at 1440p and then to 18 at 4K. At Low settings, the decline goes from 79 FPS at 1080p to 52 at 1440p and 29 at 4K. This scaling pattern shows that resolution has a massive impact, confirming that the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints.

Q: Is the CPU powerful enough for other tasks based on its benchmark scores?

A: Absolutely. The Ryzen 9 8945HX achieves 42,713 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6,030 in single-core, along with 17,939 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Its PassMark multi-thread score is 51,405, and it excels in integer math (195,180) and floating-point math (117,453). For gaming, though, these CPU strengths do not translate into high FPS in Fivem because the GPU cannot keep up.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2,823 out of 3,005 tested systems for Fivem places this configuration in the bottom 6% of all combinations. This low standing is not due to the processor, which sits comfortably in the 95th percentile for CPU performance, but rather the integrated GPU, which only reaches the 45th percentile for graphics capabilities. The disparity between the two components is stark: the CPU is a top-tier mobile part, while the GPU is a mid-pack integrated solution.

Benchmark results indicate that the Ryzen 9 8945HX’s average score of 76,212 nearly matches the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX at 76,155, with a delta of just 0.1%. It also outperforms the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D by 0.6%, a desktop flagship chip. In contrast, the Radeon 890M’s average GPU score of 9,210 trails the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 by 0.7%, a card released over a decade earlier. This pairing creates a situation where the system’s gaming performance is capped by the weakest link, which is exactly what the Fivem data reflects.

When compared to other combos in the database, this system falls behind the vast majority. The rank of 2,823 suggests that most tested configurations, even those with older or lower-end CPUs, achieve better frame rates in Fivem because they pair their processors with discrete GPUs. The measured FPS numbers reinforce this: even at the most favorable settings (1080p Low), the system only reaches 79 FPS, which is far from the high refresh rates that many Fivem players target. At 4K Ultra, the 14 FPS average places the system in unplayable territory.

The data also shows that the CPU’s multi-threading capabilities, such as a 32-thread count and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,713, do not contribute to better frame rates in this title. Fivem, being a multiplayer modification, often has CPU-heavy server-side and client-side logic, but the integrated GPU still becomes the bottleneck before the CPU’s resources are fully utilized. This is a classic case of a strong processor being held back by a weak graphics solution.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable pattern: every increase in resolution results in a substantial drop in frame rate, regardless of the graphics preset. Starting at 1080p, the system achieves its highest scores, but these plummet as the pixel count rises. For example, at Low settings, the average FPS goes from 79 at 1080p to 52 at 1440p, a 34% reduction, and then to 29 at 4K, a further 44% reduction from the 1440p figure. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU that lacks the raw pixel throughput and memory bandwidth for high-resolution rendering.

At Medium settings, the frame rate drops from 62 FPS at 1080p to 41 FPS at 1440p and finally to 23 FPS at 4K. The High preset follows a similar trajectory: 50 FPS at 1080p, 33 FPS at 1440p, and 18 FPS at 4K. Ultra settings show the worst scaling, with 38 FPS at 1080p falling to 25 FPS at 1440p and just 14 FPS at 4K. These numbers indicate that the GPU’s fill rate, which is tied to its 32 ROPs and 92.80 GPixel/s pixel rate, is insufficient for resolutions beyond 1080p.

The limiting component is unmistakably the GPU. The Radeon 890M’s memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," meaning it relies on shared system memory, which is far slower than dedicated VRAM. The GPU’s boost clock of 2,900 MHz and 5.939 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are respectable for an integrated part, but they are not enough to handle the increased pixel count at 1440p and 4K. The CPU, by contrast, shows no signs of being a bottleneck; its high single-core score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 would be more than adequate for Fivem’s game logic.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K also highlights the importance of settings. At 1080p, dropping from Ultra to Low almost doubles the frame rate, from 38 to 79 FPS. At 4K, the same settings change improves performance from 14 to 29 FPS, again roughly doubling. This indicates that the GPU is heavily affected by both resolution and graphical fidelity, and users should prioritize lowering both to achieve playable frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system’s performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the best results are achieved: Low settings produce an average of 79 FPS, Medium produces 62 FPS with a minimum of 53 and maximum of 71, High produces 50 FPS, and Ultra produces 38 FPS. These numbers show that 1080p is the only resolution where the system can maintain a comfortable frame rate for most users, with Medium and Low both exceeding the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops significantly. Low settings yield an average of 52 FPS, Medium yields 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 and maximum of 47, High yields 33 FPS, and Ultra yields 25 FPS. At this resolution, no preset reaches 60 FPS, and even Low settings dip below the ideal threshold for smooth gameplay. The minimum frame rate of 35 FPS at Medium suggests that there may be occasional stutters during busy multiplayer scenes, which is common in Fivem.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playability. Low settings produce an average of 29 FPS, Medium produces 23 FPS with a minimum of 19 and maximum of 26, High produces 18 FPS, and Ultra produces 14 FPS. These frame rates are too low for a fast-paced multiplayer game, and the minimum of 19 FPS at Medium indicates that the experience would be consistently choppy. The 4K data makes it clear that this resolution is not viable for this combo.

The frame time consistency, where available, shows that the system is relatively stable. At 1080p Medium, the difference between the minimum (53 FPS) and maximum (71 FPS) is 18 FPS, which is a reasonable spread. At 1440p Medium, the spread is 12 FPS (35 to 47), and at 4K Medium, it is 7 FPS (19 to 26). This suggests that while the average frame rates are low at higher resolutions, the frame delivery is not erratic, which is a minor positive.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 890M is the decisive factor in this combo’s Fivem performance. This integrated GPU, based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture and built on a 4 nm process, features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operations pipelines. It also includes 16 ray tracing cores, though Fivem’s workload is unlikely to heavily utilize them. The GPU’s boost clock reaches 2,900 MHz, and its FP32 performance is rated at 5.939 TFLOPS, which are solid figures for an integrated solution.

However, the GPU’s memory architecture is a major limitation. The Radeon 890M uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and instead relies on the system’s DDR5 memory. The memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which means it varies based on the CPU’s memory configuration. In this case, the Ryzen 9 8945HX supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, but this is shared between the CPU and GPU, and it is far below what discrete GPUs offer. This explains why the GPU’s benchmark scores are low, placing it in the 45th percentile, and why its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and GTX 465.

The GPU’s benchmark results further illustrate its capabilities. It scores 8,076 in PassMark G3D, 4,157 in GPU compute, and 37,254 in Geekbench OpenCL. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 590. These numbers are modest, and the PassMark DirectX scores (73 for DX11, 37 for DX12, 33 for DX10, and 97 for DX9) suggest that the GPU performs relatively better in older APIs. Fivem, which is based on the Grand Theft Auto V engine, often relies on DirectX 11, so the 73 score in that category is somewhat relevant, but it still indicates limited headroom.

The GPU’s 32 ROPs and 92.80 GPixel/s pixel rate are the primary constraints at higher resolutions. At 4K, the pixel count is over four times that of 1080p, and the Radeon 890M simply does not have the fill rate to maintain playable frame rates. The texture rate of 185.6 GTexel/s is also limiting, as Fivem’s detailed environments require significant texture throughput. In contrast, the CPU’s integrated graphics, the Radeon 610M, is even weaker, but the 890M is the GPU being measured in this data.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and the user’s preference for frame rate versus visual quality. At 1080p, the Medium preset is the best choice for most players. It delivers an average of 62 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and it provides better visuals than Low settings. The minimum frame rate of 53 FPS ensures that even in demanding scenes, the game remains playable. High settings at 1080p drop to 50 FPS, which is still acceptable but may feel less responsive, while Ultra at 38 FPS is best avoided unless the user prioritizes visuals over performance.

At 1440p, the system cannot achieve 60 FPS on any preset. The Low settings produce 52 FPS, which is the highest available, and this is the recommended choice for users who want the smoothest experience at this resolution. Medium settings at 41 FPS are playable but may feel sluggish during intense multiplayer moments. High and Ultra settings, at 33 and 25 FPS respectively, are not recommended for Fivem, as the frame rate drops below the level needed for consistent aiming and driving.

At 4K, the system is not viable for Fivem. The best result is 29 FPS at Low settings, which is below the 30 FPS minimum for playable frame rates, and even that is inconsistent. Medium settings at 23 FPS, High at 18 FPS, and Ultra at 14 FPS are all too low for a multiplayer game where quick reactions are essential. Users with a 4K display should consider lowering the resolution to 1080p or 1440p to achieve a better experience.

For the best overall experience, the data suggests running Fivem at 1080p with Medium settings. This configuration provides a 62 FPS average with a 53 FPS minimum, balancing visual fidelity and performance. If the user has a 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitor, dropping to Low settings at 1080p, which yields 79 FPS, could be worth considering, but the visual downgrade may not be justified for a 17 FPS gain. The Ultra preset is only recommended for users who prioritize screenshots or cinematic play over competitive performance, as the 38 FPS at 1080p is below the threshold for smooth gameplay.