Fivem

Fivem’s measured performance with the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti shows a clear hierarchy across presets, with the data suggesting that Medium settings provide the most balanced experience for most users. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers 241 FPS average, which is only 21% lower than the Low preset’s 305 FPS but offers significantly better visual fidelity. The High preset at this resolution drops to 193 FPS, a 25% reduction from Medium, while Ultra falls further to 150 FPS. At 2560x1440, the pattern holds: Medium achieves 159 FPS, comfortably above the 144Hz refresh rate common in gaming monitors, while High trails at 127 FPS and Ultra drops to 98 FPS. The 3840x2160 results show Medium at 88 FPS with a minimum of 75 FPS, which remains playable, whereas High falls to 70 FPS and Ultra to 55 FPS. Low settings at 4K produce 112 FPS, but the visual compromise is substantial.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data strongly indicates that the Medium preset is the optimal choice for this combination across all resolutions. At 1080p, Medium’s 241 FPS average leaves ample headroom for multiplayer scenarios where Fivem’s server-side scripting can cause frametime spikes; the recorded minimum of 205 FPS at this setting confirms stability. High settings at 1080p reduce the average to 193 FPS, which is still excellent but represents a noticeable 20% performance cost for marginal visual gains. The Ultra preset at 1080p, delivering 150 FPS, shows that even a high-end GPU like the RTX 4070 Ti cannot maintain the same framerate headroom when pushed to maximum quality.

Moving to 1440p, the Medium preset’s 159 FPS average with a 135 FPS minimum makes it the clear recommendation for high-refresh-rate displays. High settings at this resolution drop to 127 FPS, which is still playable but begins to approach the threshold where competitive multiplayer titles benefit from higher framerates. The Ultra preset at 1440p yields 98 FPS, which is acceptable for slower-paced gameplay but not ideal for the fast reaction times often required in Fivem’s roleplay and action scenarios. At 4K, Medium’s 88 FPS average with a 75 FPS minimum is the only preset that consistently stays above 60 FPS, making it the recommended setting for 4K displays. Low settings at 4K provide 112 FPS but sacrifice too much visual quality for a multiplayer game where immersion and environment readability matter.

The data suggests that users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors should prioritize Medium at 1440p, as it delivers 159 FPS with a minimum of 135 FPS, keeping the experience smooth. For 4K users, Medium is the only preset that avoids dropping below 60 FPS in the measured minimum, which is crucial for maintaining consistent gameplay. High settings are viable for those who prefer visual quality over maximum framerates, but the 20-30% performance penalty compared to Medium makes it a secondary choice. Ultra should be reserved for scenarios where framerate is not a priority, such as screenshotting or single-player exploration.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, demonstrates how memory capacity and bandwidth interact with Fivem’s engine. The GPU’s 7680 shading units and 240 texture mapping units provide substantial raw compute, but the data reveals that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 55, which is 39% lower than 4K Medium’s 88 FPS, indicating that the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth are stretched by the combination of high resolution and maximum settings. The GPU’s boost clock of 2610 MHz and base clock of 2310 MHz are consistent with its 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance, yet the measured results show that Fivem’s draw calls and texture streaming place significant demands on the memory subsystem.

The 12 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for Fivem’s typical asset loads, as evidenced by the stable minimum framerates at Medium settings across all resolutions. However, the Ultra preset’s performance drop suggests that the GPU’s 192-bit memory bus becomes a limiting factor when texture quality and draw distances are maximized. The RTX 4070 Ti’s 80 ROPs and 208.8 GPixel/s pixel rate are adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K the pixel throughput requirement increases substantially, explaining the 70 FPS average at 4K High versus 127 FPS at 1440p High. The GPU’s 84th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44795, places it in the upper tier, yet Fivem’s multiplayer nature means that CPU-side frame pacing can influence results.

The data indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti handles 1440p Medium with ease, maintaining 159 FPS average, but the transition to 4K Medium at 88 FPS shows a 45% performance reduction that aligns with the 2.25x increase in pixel count. The GPU’s 21 Gbps effective memory clock and 1313 MHz memory clock provide the bandwidth needed for high-resolution textures, but the measured results suggest that Fivem’s engine does not scale perfectly with the GPU’s raw compute capabilities. The RTX 4070 Ti’s predecessor relationship to the GeForce 30 series and successor to the GeForce 50 series places it in a transitional position, but for Fivem specifically, the GPU’s strengths in rasterization are more relevant than its ray tracing capabilities.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, plays a critical role in Fivem’s performance, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. The CPU’s base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz, combined with 32 MB of L3 cache, provide strong single-thread performance that is essential for Fivem’s main game thread. The PassMark single-thread score of 4691 and multithread score of 36470 indicate that the CPU is well-suited for the game’s workload, which often involves physics calculations, AI for NPCs, and network synchronization in multiplayer servers.

The data reveals that at 1080p Low, the combination achieves 305 FPS, which is only 51% higher than the 201 FPS at 1440p Low. This smaller-than-expected gap at Low settings suggests that the CPU becomes a more significant limiter at lower resolutions, as the GPU has spare capacity. The 1080p Medium result of 241 FPS, compared to 1440p Medium’s 159 FPS, shows a 34% reduction that is closer to the expected GPU-bound scaling. At Ultra settings, the 1080p result of 150 FPS versus 1440p’s 98 FPS represents a 35% drop, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint at higher quality settings. This pattern suggests that the Ryzen 7 9700F’s 8-core/16-thread configuration is sufficient to feed the RTX 4070 Ti at 1080p Low, but the CPU’s performance ceiling becomes apparent when framerates exceed 300 FPS.

The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69996, places it in the top tier. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with a delta of 0.2% and the Intel Core i7-14700KF with a delta of -0.2%, showing that the 9700F is competitive with high-end desktop and mobile parts. The CPU’s 65W TDP and 4nm process node from TSMC contribute to its efficiency, but the measured Fivem results indicate that the CPU’s boost clock of 5.50 GHz is crucial for maintaining high framerates in CPU-bound scenarios. The L3 cache of 32 MB helps with Fivem’s asset streaming, while the dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the CPU can quickly access game data.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti ranks 324th out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 10.8% of all configurations. This ranking is notable given that the CPU and GPU are individually high-performing, but the data shows that Fivem’s specific workload does not always scale perfectly with the raw power of these components. The rank of 324 suggests that there are 323 combinations that achieve higher average framerates in this game, likely including configurations with faster CPUs or GPUs that are better optimized for Fivem’s engine.

The combo’s ranking is influenced by the fact that Fivem is a multiplayer modification with variable server-side performance, and the measured data shows that the RTX 4070 Ti’s 84th percentile GPU ranking does not directly translate to a top-tier gaming result in this specific title. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking is more impressive, but the game’s reliance on single-thread performance means that the Ryzen 7 9700F’s 4691 PassMark single-thread score is the more relevant metric. The combo’s position in the middle of the upper quartile indicates that users with this hardware can expect smooth gameplay at most settings, but those seeking the absolute highest framerates may need to consider CPUs with even higher single-thread performance or GPUs with more memory bandwidth.

The ranking also reflects the balance between the components: the RTX 4070 Ti is a strong GPU, but Fivem’s engine does not appear to fully utilize its 40.09 TFLOPS of compute power, instead being more sensitive to memory bandwidth and pixel throughput. The 324th rank out of 3005 combos means that this configuration outperforms 89.2% of tested systems, which is a strong result for a mainstream high-end build. The data suggests that the combo is well-suited for 1440p gaming at Medium to High settings, and capable of 4K at Medium settings, but not optimized for maximum framerates at all quality levels.

FAQ

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 delivers 159 FPS average with a 135 FPS minimum, making it the best choice for smooth gameplay. High settings at this resolution achieve 127 FPS, which is still playable but less consistent.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset provides 88 FPS average with a 75 FPS minimum, which is the only preset that stays above 60 FPS consistently. Low settings achieve 112 FPS, while High and Ultra drop to 70 FPS and 55 FPS respectively.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in Fivem?

A: The data shows that the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings, as evidenced by the 45% framerate drop from 1440p Medium to 4K Medium. At 1080p Low, the CPU is more limiting, with the 305 FPS result being only 51% higher than 1440p Low’s 201 FPS.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p Ultra settings?

A: The combination achieves 150 FPS average at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which is 38% lower than the Medium preset’s 241 FPS but still provides a high-refresh-rate experience.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This configuration ranks 324th out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 10.8% of all systems tested for this game.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium?

A: The measured minimum at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 135 FPS, with a maximum of 182 FPS, indicating good stability during heavy scenes.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 305 FPS average, Medium reaches 241 FPS with a minimum of 205 FPS and maximum of 277 FPS, High delivers 193 FPS, and Ultra drops to 150 FPS. The 1080p results show a clear progression, with each step up in quality costing approximately 20-25% of the average framerate. The Medium preset’s minimum of 205 FPS is particularly strong, suggesting that this setting provides a stable experience for competitive play.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 201 FPS, Medium reaches 159 FPS with a minimum of 135 FPS and maximum of 182 FPS, High delivers 127 FPS, and Ultra drops to 98 FPS. The 1440p results show a similar pattern to 1080p, but the framerate gaps between settings are slightly larger, indicating that the GPU is becoming more of a factor. The Medium preset’s 135 FPS minimum is still above 120 FPS, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate displays. At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves 112 FPS, Medium reaches 88 FPS with a minimum of 75 FPS and maximum of 101 FPS, High delivers 70 FPS, and Ultra drops to 55 FPS. The 4K results show a more dramatic drop-off, with Ultra falling below 60 FPS and Medium barely staying above it.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the system’s bottleneck. At Medium settings, the average framerate drops from 241 FPS at 1080p to 159 FPS at 1440p, a 34% reduction, and then to 88 FPS at 4K, a further 45% reduction. The 1080p to 1440p drop is smaller than the 1440p to 4K drop, indicating that the CPU still has headroom at 1080p but becomes less relevant as resolution increases. At Low settings, the framerates are 305 FPS at 1080p, 201 FPS at 1440p, and 112 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p reduction of 34% is similar to Medium’s, but the 1440p to 4K reduction of 44% is slightly less, suggesting that the GPU is more capable at Low settings.

The High and Ultra presets show more consistent scaling, with 1080p to 1440p drops of 34% for High (193 to 127 FPS) and 35% for Ultra (150 to 98 FPS). The 1440p to 4K drops are 45% for High (127 to 70 FPS) and 44% for Ultra (98 to 55 FPS). This pattern suggests that the GPU is the primary limiter at higher settings, as the framerate reductions closely track the pixel count increase. The data implies that for 4K gaming, users should accept Medium settings to stay above 60 FPS, while for 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor at framerates above 300 FPS. The resolution scaling confirms that the RTX 4070 Ti is best suited for 1440p gaming, where it can deliver high framerates with visual quality intact.