Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination delivers a commanding performance profile in Fivem, with benchmark results showing a clear hierarchy across resolutions and settings. This analysis breaks down the measured data to explain how the CPU and GPU each contribute to the final frame rates, how the combo ranks against other tested configurations, and what settings provide the optimal experience.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The processor has a 32 MB shared L3 cache, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 KB of L1 per core. It supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is substantial, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the primary bottleneck. The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 245 FPS, while at Ultra settings it drops to 137 FPS. This 1080p Low result is the highest measured frame rate in the entire dataset, indicating that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to reach very high frame rates. The 7700X's single-thread performance is a key factor here; its 3dmark_single_thread score of 1090 and geekbench_singlecore score of 2289 suggest strong per-core capability, which is critical for a multiplayer game like Fivem where physics and game logic often run on a limited number of threads. The processor's 8-core, 16-thread configuration also provides ample headroom for background tasks and server communication.

The CPU's multi-threaded scores reinforce its overall capability. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 19088 and the passmark_multithread score of 35686 show that the 7700X can sustain heavy workloads. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 8859 and 3dmark_max_threads score of 8852 are nearly identical, suggesting that the processor scales well up to its full thread count. However, in Fivem, the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p reveals that the CPU's performance ceiling is not the limiting factor; instead, the workload increases with settings, pulling frame rates down from 245 to 137 FPS. The CPU's percentile ranking of 85 against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35909, places it in a strong position, but its nearest rivals show very small deltas—the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is only 0.3% behind, and the Intel Core 7 250H is 0.5% behind. This indicates that while the 7700X is a top-tier performer, the margin over its closest competitors is slim in synthetic benchmarks, though the Fivem results show it is more than sufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how each preset performs. The settings available are Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, and the results vary significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields 245 FPS, Medium yields 211 FPS (with a min of 179 and max of 242), High yields 180 FPS, and Ultra yields 137 FPS. The Medium preset offers a strong balance: it is only 34 FPS below Low, but it provides a substantial visual upgrade over the lowest settings. The High preset, at 180 FPS, is still well above the 144 Hz refresh rate common on modern monitors, and it offers better visual fidelity than Medium. However, the jump from High to Ultra costs 43 FPS, which is a significant drop for what might be a marginal visual improvement in a multiplayer environment.

At 2560x1440, the pattern shifts. Low settings produce 216 FPS, Medium produces 147 FPS (min 125, max 169), High produces 124 FPS, and Ultra drops to 94 FPS. Here, the Medium preset is the sweet spot for high refresh rate gaming, as it stays above the 144 FPS threshold. High is still playable at 124 FPS, but it is closer to the 120 FPS mark. Ultra, at 94 FPS, is best suited for players who prioritize visual quality over raw frame rate, but the drop from Medium is 53 FPS, which is substantial. At 3840x2160, the CPU's influence wanes and the GPU becomes the primary driver. Low settings yield 129 FPS, Medium yields 87 FPS (min 74, max 100), High yields 73 FPS, and Ultra drops to 56 FPS. At this resolution, the Medium preset is the only one that remains above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for a smooth experience. High is playable but close to 60 FPS, and Ultra will show noticeable stutter in busy scenes.

The data suggests that the best experience depends on the target resolution. For 1080p, the High preset at 180 FPS offers excellent visual quality without sacrificing too much performance compared to Medium. For 1440p, Medium at 147 FPS is the optimal balance, providing a smooth experience with good detail. For 4K, Medium at 87 FPS is the only preset that guarantees a frame rate above 60 FPS, so it is the recommended choice. Players with high-refresh-rate 4K displays may need to use Low settings to reach 129 FPS, but that comes with a significant visual penalty.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The FPS drop across resolutions reveals the shifting bottleneck between CPU and GPU. At Low settings, the frame rate falls from 245 FPS at 1080p to 216 FPS at 1440p, a drop of 29 FPS, and then to 129 FPS at 4K, a further drop of 87 FPS. This pattern indicates that at Low settings, the CPU is heavily involved at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K. The 129 FPS at 4K Low is still high, but the 45% reduction from 1440p to 4K shows that the RTX 4090 is being pushed harder. At Medium settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 64 FPS (from 211 to 147), and from 1440p to 4K it is 60 FPS (from 147 to 87). This consistent drop suggests a balanced workload where both CPU and GPU contribute. At High settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 56 FPS (from 180 to 124), and from 1440p to 4K it is 51 FPS (from 124 to 73). The absolute frame rates are lower, indicating that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck as settings increase. At Ultra settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 43 FPS (from 137 to 94), and from 1440p to 4K it is 38 FPS (from 94 to 56).

The scaling behavior shows that the RTX 4090 is the limiting component at 4K across all settings. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU has enough headroom to keep frame rates high, but the GPU's workload scales with resolution. The fact that the 4K Ultra result is 56 FPS, while the 1080p Ultra result is 137 FPS, indicates a 59% reduction, which is typical for a game that is not heavily optimized for multi-core CPUs. The CPU's strong single-thread performance helps, but the GPU's rendering demands dominate at higher resolutions. The data shows that to maintain high frame rates at 4K, players must reduce settings to Low, which yields 129 FPS, but at Medium settings, the frame rate drops to 87 FPS, highlighting the GPU's role as the primary constraint at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 ranks 647 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the top 17.5% of all tested configurations, which is a strong result given the game's multiplayer nature and its reliance on both CPU and GPU performance. The rank of 647 is notable because it is not higher, despite the top-tier components. This is likely due to Fivem's optimization, which may not fully utilize the RTX 4090's capabilities at lower resolutions, or the CPU's performance being sufficient but not exceptional in this specific game. The dataset includes 3707 combos, and being in the top 647 means there are 3060 configurations that perform worse, but also 646 that perform better. The better-performing combos likely include CPUs with even higher single-thread scores or GPUs with higher raw compute, but the margin is not specified. The combo's rank is a relative measure, and the data shows that while the RTX 4090 is a top-tier GPU, its percentile ranking of 88 against all GPUs is slightly lower than the CPU's 85 percentile ranking. This suggests that in Fivem, the CPU's performance is relatively more important than the GPU's, as the game may be CPU-bound in many scenarios. The combo rank of 647 out of 3707 indicates that there is room for improvement, but for most players, this configuration will deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, and playable frame rates at 4K.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, with a chip codenamed AD102, and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. The GPU's base clock is 2235 MHz, with a boost clock of 2520 MHz, and the memory runs at 1313 MHz, with 21 Gbps effective. It has 16384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, along with 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores. The GPU's FP32 performance is 82.58 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, with a texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s. The RTX 4090 has a TDP of 450 W and is a triple-slot card, requiring a 850 W power supply.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions and settings. The 24 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient for this game, which does not require large texture pools, but the bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s ensures that data can be streamed quickly to the GPU. The high boost clock of 2520 MHz contributes to the GPU's ability to maintain high frame rates, but the data shows that the RTX 4090 is not fully utilized at 1080p. At 1080p Low, the frame rate is 245 FPS, which is likely limited by the CPU's ability to issue draw calls. The GPU's average benchmark score is 60347, with a percentile ranking of 88 against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show very small deltas: the Intel Arc Pro A60 is at 0% difference, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is 0.3% ahead. This indicates that in synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 4090 is comparable to these professional cards, but in Fivem, its gaming-focused architecture provides higher frame rates. The GPU's performance in Fivem is best demonstrated at 4K Ultra, where it achieves 56 FPS, and at 4K Low, where it achieves 129 FPS. The drop from 129 to 56 FPS across settings shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, as the CPU's performance is less relevant at this resolution. The RTX 4090's 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is ample for this game, but the rendering workload at 4K Ultra is heavy enough to push the GPU to its limits.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS is 245, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the maximum measured value in the dataset.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average FPS of 56. This is the lowest result in the dataset, indicating that 4K Ultra is the most demanding configuration.

Q: What is the combo's rank out of all tested combinations in Fivem?

A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 ranks 647 out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the top 17.5% of all configurations.

Q: Which setting preset provides the best balance of FPS and visual quality at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset achieves 147 FPS with a minimum of 125 FPS and a maximum of 169 FPS. This is the recommended preset for a smooth experience, as it stays above the 144 Hz refresh rate threshold.

Q: How much does the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the FPS drops from 180 at 1920x1080 to 124 at 2560x1440, and then to 73 at 3840x2160. The total drop from 1080p to 4K is 107 FPS, a reduction of 59%.

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and how does it compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 35909. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, has an average score of 35802, which is 0.3% lower.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average FPS of 245. The Medium preset achieves 211 FPS, with a minimum of 179 FPS and a maximum of 242 FPS. The High preset produces 180 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 137 FPS. These results show that at 1080p, the combo can easily handle high refresh rate displays, with even the Ultra preset remaining above 120 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset yields 216 FPS, which is still very high. The Medium preset achieves 147 FPS, with a minimum of 125 FPS and a maximum of 169 FPS. The High preset drops to 124 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 94 FPS. The Medium preset is the only one that stays above the 144 FPS mark, making it the best choice for competitive play at this resolution. The High preset at 124 FPS is still playable, but it is closer to the 120 FPS threshold, and Ultra at 94 FPS is better suited for slower-paced gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves 129 FPS, which is the only 4K result above 100 FPS. The Medium preset produces 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. The High preset drops to 73 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 56 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is the primary bottleneck, and the data shows that to maintain a consistent 60+ FPS experience, players must use the Medium preset or lower. The Ultra preset at 56 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold, which may result in noticeable frame pacing issues. The data shows a clear scaling pattern: as resolution increases, the frame rate drops, and the settings play a larger role in determining the final FPS. The combo is most effective at 1080p, where it can push well beyond 200 FPS on Low and Medium settings, and it remains capable at 1440p with Medium settings. At 4K, the combo is playable but requires lower settings to achieve high frame rates.