Fivem

FAQ

Q: What is the comboRankInGame for the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in Fivem?

A: This combination ranks 919th out of 1792 tested combos, placing it just above the median of the database for this game.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 3700X has an average benchmark score of 28631. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600, scores 28654, which is only 0.1% higher. The AMD EPYC 7203P scores 28583, which is 0.2% lower.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested GPUs?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti sits at the 69th percentile of all GPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms roughly two-thirds of tested graphics cards.

Q: What is the best measured FPS for this combo at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 195.1 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded across all tested settings and resolutions.

Q: How does the GPU's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 25120. The AMD Radeon RX 6700M scores 25180, just 0.2% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 scores 25235, 0.5% higher.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between 1080p Ultra and 4K Ultra?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra the combo averages 97 FPS, while at 3840x2160 Ultra it drops to 35.5 FPS — a reduction of 61.5 FPS, or roughly 63% lower performance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA104 chip fabricated on an 8 nm process by Samsung. It carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU's base clock is 1410 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution climbs. The measured data shows that at 4K, the frame rate scales closely with the GPU's compute capabilities. The card's FP32 throughput of 16.20 TFLOPS and texture rate of 253.1 GTexel/s directly influence how many pixels can be shaded per frame. At 3840x2160, the pixel count is four times that of 1080p, and the average FPS drops proportionally — from 124.4 at 1080p High to 45.1 at 4K High, a 63.7% reduction.

The GPU's nearest rivals in the database are all AMD products: the Radeon RX 6700M at 25180 average score (-0.2%), the Radeon RX 6600 at 25235 (-0.5%), and the Radeon 890M at 25246 (-0.5%). These margins are tight, meaning any of these cards would produce nearly identical FPS in Fivem at the same settings. The RTX 3060 Ti's 69th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it has ample headroom for mid-range gaming, but the data indicates it becomes the bottleneck at 4K Ultra where the combo only manages 35.5 FPS.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent pattern of frame rate decline as resolution increases, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload at higher pixel counts.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers strong performance across all settings: Low produces 195.1 FPS, Medium 157.8 FPS, High 124.4 FPS, and Ultra 97 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly — Low yields 128.1 FPS, Medium 101.9 FPS, High 79.9 FPS, and Ultra 65.9 FPS. This represents a 34.3% decrease from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings, and a 32.1% decrease at Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the decline steepens further. Low produces 70.9 FPS, Medium 58.8 FPS, High 45.1 FPS, and Ultra 35.5 FPS. Comparing 1080p to 4K, the FPS drop is 63.7% at Low, 62.7% at Medium, 63.7% at High, and 63.4% at Ultra. This near-uniform percentage drop across all settings strongly suggests the GPU is the limiting component at 4K — the rendering load scales with pixel count regardless of how many visual effects are enabled.

The scaling behavior also reveals something about the CPU's role. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 195.1 FPS, which is well above typical monitor refresh rates. The fact that frame rates continue to scale downward smoothly with resolution — rather than hitting a CPU-imposed ceiling — indicates the Ryzen 7 3700X has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU even at lower resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 919 out of 1792 tested combinations places it slightly below the midpoint of the database. This ranking reflects the balance between the Ryzen 7 3700X and the RTX 3060 Ti in Fivem specifically.

The CPU itself performs well relative to its peers, holding an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 28631 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-12600 (28654, -0.1%) and the Intel Core i5-12600H (28666, -0.1%), while slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (28591, 0.1%) and the AMD EPYC 7203P (28583, 0.2%). These tiny margins indicate that the 3700X is right at the performance frontier for its class.

The GPU's 69th percentile ranking is more modest, and its average benchmark score of 25120 trails its nearest rivals by fractions of a percent. The combination of a high-percentile CPU with a mid-tier GPU explains the overall combo rank of 919 — the system is CPU-heavy relative to its graphics capability.

In Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification framework for a game originally released in 2017, the workload can vary widely depending on server scripts and player counts. The measured data shows this combo can hit 195.1 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating strong CPU performance at low graphical loads. However, at 4K Ultra the system falls to 35.5 FPS, confirming that the GPU becomes the performance ceiling in graphically demanding scenarios.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is a Zen 2 architecture processor codenamed Matisse, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The CPU has a 32 MB L3 cache, with 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core. Its TDP is 65 W, and it supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

In Fivem, the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are relevant because the game engine and server scripts can spread work across multiple threads. The 3700X's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19087 and Geekbench multi-core score of 8083 indicate strong parallel processing capability. Its PassMark multithread score of 22458 and physics score of 1181 further demonstrate its ability to handle complex simulation workloads.

The single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core scoring 2694 and Geekbench single-core at 1672. This matters for Fivem because many game logic operations are inherently single-threaded. The PassMark single-thread score of 2656 shows the CPU can maintain high frame rates when the GPU is not the bottleneck — evidenced by the 195.1 FPS at 1080p Low.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 3700X's average benchmark score of 28631 is effectively tied with the Intel Core i5-12600 (28654, -0.1%) and i5-12600H (28666, -0.1%). It edges out the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (28591, 0.1%) and the AMD EPYC 7203P (28583, 0.2%). These differences are within noise, meaning the CPU choice among these four would not produce a meaningful FPS difference in Fivem.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings levels, providing a complete picture of performance scaling.

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its highest frame rates. Low settings yield an average of 195.1 FPS, which is the maximum measured across all configurations. Medium settings produce 157.8 FPS, High settings deliver 124.4 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 97 FPS. The step from Low to Medium represents a 19.1% reduction, from Medium to High an 21.2% reduction, and from High to Ultra a 22.0% reduction.

At 2560x1440, the results are: Low at 128.1 FPS, Medium at 101.9 FPS, High at 79.9 FPS, and Ultra at 65.9 FPS. The percentage drops between settings are: Low to Medium 20.5%, Medium to High 21.6%, and High to Ultra 17.5%. This pattern is consistent with the 1080p results, showing that each settings tier adds a roughly similar computational cost regardless of resolution.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates fall to: Low at 70.9 FPS, Medium at 58.8 FPS, High at 45.1 FPS, and Ultra at 35.5 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 17.1%, from Medium to High 23.3%, and from High to Ultra 21.3%. Notably, the 4K Ultra result of 35.5 FPS is the only configuration that falls below 40 FPS, which is generally considered marginal for smooth gameplay.

The data shows that this combo can maintain 60+ FPS at 4K only with Low settings (70.9 FPS), while Medium settings at 4K fall just short at 58.8 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 60 FPS, with Ultra at 65.9 FPS and High at 79.9 FPS. At 1080p, all settings exceed 90 FPS, making this resolution the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate displays with this hardware.