Evolve
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 126 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 61 | 77 | 100 |
| 1440p QHD | 74 | 107 | 136 | 176 |
| 1080p Full HD | 110 | 159 | 203 | 262 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Evolve with Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 lands at rank 647 out of 2872 tested combinations for Evolve, placing it in the top quarter of all recorded systems. That rank reflects a pairing where the CPU’s strong synthetic scores and the GPU’s solid rasterization performance combine to deliver consistently high frame rates across most settings and resolutions, though the Ultra preset at 4K shows the limits of this configuration. The combo’s percentile positioning suggests it is a capable setup for this 2015 FPS, with the data indicating that users can expect smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires careful settings management to stay above playable thresholds.
How This Combo Ranks
The measured data places this specific CPU-GPU pairing at 647th out of 2872 tested combinations for Evolve, which translates to roughly the 77.5th percentile of all recorded system configurations. That ranking is not accidental — it reflects a balance where neither component becomes a consistent bottleneck at mainstream resolutions. The CPU alone sits at the 96th percentile among all processors in the database, with an average benchmark score of 93785, while the GPU holds the 81st percentile among all graphics cards, averaging 37648 in its own benchmarks. When combined, the system’s rank in Evolve is slightly lower than the CPU’s standalone percentile but higher than the GPU’s, suggesting that the game’s workload leans on both parts without overwhelming either.
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus essentially ties with the Intel Xeon 6520P, which posts an average score of 93786 — a delta of 0%. The AMD EPYC 4564P is 1.5% ahead, while the AMD EPYC 9175F and AMD EPYC 4565P sit 1.9% and 2.1% ahead, respectively. These are small margins, meaning the CPU’s raw compute power is comparable to enterprise-class parts in synthetic tests, but for Evolve, what matters more is how that power translates into frame pacing. For the GPU, the RTX 4070’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (0.4% ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (1.3% behind). The RTX 4070 is 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6400, showing that in pure average benchmark terms, this desktop card holds its own against a mix of professional and mobile parts.
Within Evolve specifically, the combo’s rank of 647 means it outperforms roughly 77% of all tested systems, but it is not at the top tier. The data shows that the biggest gap in performance comes at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 42, which is below the 60 FPS threshold many players consider smooth. At 1080p, however, the system excels, with even the Ultra preset hitting 110 FPS average. This rank suggests that the pairing is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and solid 1440p gameplay, but 4K requires dropping settings — a pattern consistent with the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD104 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process with 35,800 million transistors. Its memory configuration includes 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective. These specs are directly relevant to Evolve’s performance: the 12 GB VRAM capacity is more than sufficient for a game from 2015, even at 4K with high-resolution textures, and the bandwidth supports high frame rates without memory throttling.
In terms of clocks, the GPU has a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The boost behavior is visible in the measured FPS data — at 1440p Medium, the system averages 136 FPS with a minimum of 116 and a maximum of 157, showing that the GPU can sustain high clocks under load without significant drops. The pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s are adequate for Evolve’s rendering demands, which are moderate by modern standards. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS also supports the notion that raw compute is not a limiting factor in this game.
Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4070’s average benchmark score of 37648 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Tesla P4’s 37628 (0.1% difference) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56’s 37507 (0.4% difference). The RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% behind, while the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 trails by 1.3%. In practical terms for Evolve, this means the RTX 4070 performs similarly to those cards in synthetic tests, but the measured FPS data shows it handles the game well — likely due to driver optimizations and the Ada Lovelace architecture’s efficiency. The GPU’s 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it is a better-than-average part, and the measured results in Evolve confirm that, with the system achieving 262 FPS at 1080p Low.
The GPU’s TDP is 200 W, and it requires a 550 W suggested PSU, but those power characteristics do not directly influence the FPS numbers. What matters is that the card can sustain its boost clock of 2475 MHz under sustained gaming loads, which the measured data supports. At 4K Medium, the system hits 77 FPS average with a minimum of 66 and maximum of 89, showing that the GPU can maintain consistent frame times even at higher resolutions, provided settings are not maxed out.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which preset offers the best experience for this combo in Evolve. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers 203 FPS average, with a minimum of 173 and maximum of 234 — that is the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors, as it stays well above 144 FPS even in the worst-case measured frames. The High preset at 1080p drops to 159 FPS average, which is still smooth, but Medium offers a buffer against dips. Low at 1080p produces 262 FPS average, but that setting sacrifices visual quality for minimal additional benefit since Medium is already far above any practical refresh rate.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset averages 136 FPS, with a minimum of 116 and maximum of 157. This is the recommended choice for 1440p gaming because it maintains an average above 120 FPS while keeping the minimum above 100. High at 1440p averages 107 FPS, which is acceptable for 60 Hz displays but falls short of high-refresh targets. Low at 1440p hits 176 FPS average, but again, Medium provides a better balance between visuals and performance. Ultra at 1440p averages 74 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced FPS action where higher frame rates provide competitive advantages.
For 3840x2160, the situation is different. Medium averages 77 FPS, with a minimum of 66 and maximum of 89 — this is the only 4K preset that stays above 60 FPS in the measured minimum, making it the recommended choice for 4K gaming. High at 4K averages 61 FPS, which is technically playable but leaves no headroom for dips, and the minimum is not measured. Low at 4K averages 100 FPS, but that preset significantly reduces visual fidelity. Ultra at 4K averages only 42 FPS, which is below the smoothness threshold and not recommended for this game.
Based on the data, the best overall experience is 1080p Medium or 1440p Medium, depending on the display’s native resolution. The Medium preset consistently delivers the highest FPS with the smallest variance between minimum and maximum, as shown by the measured ranges. For users with 4K monitors, Medium is the only viable option that maintains a minimum above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset should be avoided entirely — at every resolution, it offers the lowest FPS, and the gap between Ultra and Medium is substantial (e.g., 110 vs 203 FPS at 1080p).
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 262 FPS, which is the maximum measured across all configurations. Medium drops to 203 FPS average, with a minimum of 173 and maximum of 234, showing tight frame pacing. High averages 159 FPS, while Ultra falls to 110 FPS. The gradient from Low to Ultra is consistent: each step up in settings costs roughly 40-50 FPS on average, with the largest single drop occurring between Medium and High (44 FPS difference).
At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. Low averages 176 FPS, Medium averages 136 FPS (minimum 116, maximum 157), High averages 107 FPS, and Ultra averages 74 FPS. The relative gaps between settings are similar to 1080p, but the percentage drop from Low to Ultra is slightly larger (from 176 to 74, a 58% reduction). The Medium preset’s minimum of 116 FPS is notable because it stays above the 100 FPS threshold, making it ideal for 1440p gaming.
At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low averages 100 FPS, Medium averages 77 FPS (minimum 66, maximum 89), High averages 61 FPS, and Ultra averages 42 FPS. The Medium preset is the only one that maintains a minimum above 60 FPS, which is critical for smooth gameplay. High at 61 FPS average is borderline — it could dip below 60 in demanding scenes, though no minimum is recorded for that setting. Ultra at 42 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the playable threshold for most users.
Comparing resolutions, the scaling is roughly linear with pixel count. Moving from 1080p to 1440p (a 78% increase in pixels) reduces Medium FPS from 203 to 136, a 33% drop. Moving from 1440p to 4K (a 125% increase in pixels) reduces Medium FPS from 136 to 77, a 43% drop. This shows that the GPU becomes more of a bottleneck at higher resolutions, which is expected given the RTX 4070’s 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB VRAM. The data does not include minimum or maximum FPS for most settings, but the Medium preset across all three resolutions includes those values, allowing for an assessment of frame consistency.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this system in Evolve?
A: Based on the measured FPS data, 2560x1440 with Medium settings provides the best balance, averaging 136 FPS with a minimum of 116 and maximum of 157. This keeps the experience smooth while maintaining visual quality. For 1080p, Medium at 203 FPS average is superior for high-refresh displays, while 4K Medium at 77 FPS average is the only 4K option that stays above 60 FPS minimum.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 perform relative to its closest GPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37648, which is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628) and 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507). It is 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38135) and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37157). These deltas show that the card is statistically similar to those parts in average performance.
Q: Is the Ultra preset viable for Evolve with this combo?
A: No, not at any resolution. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 110; at 1440p Ultra, it drops to 74; at 4K Ultra, it falls to 42. While 1080p Ultra is playable, the Medium preset at that resolution delivers 203 FPS average, making Ultra a poor choice given the significant performance cost. At 4K, Ultra’s 42 FPS average is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4070 have, and does it matter for Evolve?
A: The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. For Evolve, a 2015 title, 12 GB is more than sufficient, even at 4K with High settings. The measured data shows no signs of VRAM limitation — the system achieves 61 FPS at 4K High, which would be problematic if memory capacity or bandwidth were a bottleneck.
Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking, and how does it compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 93785. It essentially ties with the Intel Xeon 6520P (93786, 0% delta). The AMD EPYC 4564P is 1.5% ahead, the AMD EPYC 9175F is 1.9% ahead, and the AMD EPYC 4565P is 2.1% ahead. These are minor differences, indicating the CPU is competitive with enterprise processors in synthetic tests.
Q: Does the system maintain consistent frame rates, or are there noticeable dips?
A: The data includes minimum and maximum FPS only for the Medium preset. At 1080p, the range is 173 to 234 FPS (average 203), showing tight variance. At 1440p, the range is 116 to 157 FPS (average 136). At 4K, the range is 66 to 89 FPS (average 77). The narrow ranges suggest stable frame pacing, with no severe stuttering or frame-time spikes recorded in the measurements.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake Refresh codename with a 3 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. This configuration provides substantial parallel processing power, which shows in its synthetic benchmarks: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 44253, while single-core reaches 2439. PassMark multithread scores 68574, and single-thread scores 5068.
For Evolve, the CPU’s role is secondary to the GPU, but it still matters for maintaining high frame rates, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. At 1080p Low, the system hits 262 FPS average, which requires the CPU to feed the GPU with enough draw calls and physics calculations. The 24 cores and 24 threads ensure that even if Evolve’s engine uses multiple threads (typical for FPS titles from that era), there is ample headroom. The boost clock of 5.50 GHz helps with single-threaded tasks, which are often the bottleneck in older games.
The CPU’s nearest rivals in the database are all enterprise-class processors: the Intel Xeon 6520P (0% delta), AMD EPYC 4564P (-1.5%), AMD EPYC 9175F (-1.9%), and AMD EPYC 4565P (-2.1%). These are server parts with high core counts, but the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus matches them in average benchmark score, indicating that its 24 cores are effectively utilized in synthetic workloads. In Evolve, the measured FPS data suggests the CPU is not a limiting factor — the performance scaling from 1080p to 4K follows the GPU’s expected curve, and even at 4K Ultra where the GPU struggles (42 FPS), the CPU is not reported as a bottleneck.
The CPU’s memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. This is relevant for gaming because memory bandwidth can affect frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. With Evolve’s moderate memory demands, the 115.2 GB/s bandwidth is more than sufficient. The CPU also supports ECC memory, though that is not a factor for gaming performance. The integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU) are present but not used in this configuration, as the RTX 4070 handles all rendering.
In terms of the combo’s overall rank, the CPU’s 96th percentile standing provides a strong foundation, but the GPU’s 81st percentile is the more limiting factor. The measured FPS data confirms this: at 4K Ultra, the system drops to 42 FPS, which is a GPU limitation given the 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 262 FPS, showing that the CPU can handle high frame rates without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU’s release date of 2026-03-10 and launch MSRP of $299 are facts in the pack, but they do not directly influence performance metrics. The 24 threads, 5.50 GHz boost, and 36 MB L3 cache are the key specifications that contribute to the system’s ability to maintain high minimum FPS in the Medium preset across all resolutions, as evidenced by the measured data.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Evolve
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 100.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 77.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 61.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 42.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 176.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 136.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 107.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 74.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 262.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 203.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 159.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 110.0 |
Evolve with iUltra 7 270K Plus + Other GPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Evolve with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 270K Plus + RTX 4070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.