Evolve
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 87 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 42 | 54 | 69 |
| 1440p QHD | 51 | 74 | 94 | 121 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 110 | 140 | 181 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Evolve with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti pairing delivers a playable but heavily resolution-dependent experience in Evolve, with the data showing a clear shift from CPU-bound performance at 1080p to a GPU-limited scenario at 4K. The measured frames per second (FPS) reveal that this combo ranks in the 1605th position out of 2872 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database, yet the scaling pattern offers distinct guidance for how to configure the game for the best possible experience.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 tells a definitive story about which component is the limiting factor at each setting tier. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 181 FPS, which drops to 121 FPS at 1440p and further to 69 FPS at 4K. This represents a 33% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 43% reduction from 1440p to 4K. Such a steep decline at higher resolutions indicates that the GTX 1080 Ti is the primary bottleneck once pixel count increases, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions.
The pattern holds across all settings but becomes more pronounced at higher quality tiers. With High settings, the drop from 110 FPS at 1080p to 74 FPS at 1440p is a 33% loss, and then to 42 FPS at 4K is another 43% loss. The consistency of these percentages across Low and High settings suggests that the GPU's rendering workload scales predictably with resolution, independent of the quality preset. This is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario, where the 14-core Intel Core Ultra 5 235, with its 5.00 GHz boost clock, is not the constraint.
However, the Ultra setting reveals a different dynamic. At 1080p Ultra, the combo achieves 76 FPS, which drops to 51 FPS at 1440p (a 33% decrease) and then to 29 FPS at 4K (a 43% decrease). The identical percentage drops indicate that even at the highest quality preset, the GPU remains the limiting component. The data suggests that the CPU's performance, as reflected in its 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs, is more than sufficient for this 2015 FPS title, leaving the older graphics card as the sole determinant of frame rates as resolution scales.
The medium settings row provides the only min/max FPS data in the pack, offering a glimpse into frame time consistency. At 4K Medium, the average is 54 FPS with a minimum of 45 and maximum of 62, showing a 17 FPS spread. At 1440p Medium, the average rises to 94 FPS with an 80 to 108 range, a 28 FPS spread. At 1080p Medium, the average is 140 FPS with a 119 to 161 range, a 42 FPS spread. The widening spread at lower resolutions suggests that while the GPU is still the bottleneck, the CPU begins to introduce more variability in frame delivery as the GPU can complete frames faster, creating a more uneven output.
FAQ
Q: Why does the FPS drop so significantly when moving from 1440p to 4K?
A: The measured data shows a consistent 43% reduction in average FPS when moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 across all settings. This consistent percentage drop, regardless of quality preset, indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti's rendering throughput is the limiting factor, as the GPU must process roughly double the pixels at 4K compared to 1440p.
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 holding back the GTX 1080 Ti in this game?
A: Benchmark results indicate the CPU is not the primary constraint. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 181 FPS, which is well above typical display refresh rates. The CPU's performance percentile of 89 versus the GPU's 58th percentile suggests the processor has significant headroom, and the consistent FPS drops with resolution scaling confirm that the graphics card is the bottleneck.
*Q: What is the best resolution to play Evolve with this hardware?*
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 offers the best balance. At High settings, the combo delivers 74 FPS, which is comfortably playable, while 4K High drops to 42 FPS, which may feel sluggish. At 1080p, the combo exceeds 110 FPS at High, but the visual fidelity is lower than what the GTX 1080 Ti can drive at 1440p.
Q: How does the GTX 1080 Ti's memory configuration affect 4K performance?
A: The GPU features 11 GB of GDDR5X memory on a 352-bit bus with 484.4 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for Evolve's textures at 4K, as the game released in 2015 and would not exceed this capacity. The 4K bottleneck is more likely the GPU's raw compute throughput, given its 11.34 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 88 ROPs.
Q: Which settings preset provides the highest frame rate at 1080p?
A: The Low preset yields the highest average at 181 FPS, followed by Medium at 140 FPS, High at 110 FPS, and Ultra at 76 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 105 FPS, indicating that quality settings have a substantial impact on performance at this resolution.
Q: Is this combo better suited for competitive or cinematic play?
A: The data suggests a split personality. For competitive play, 1080p Low at 181 FPS provides the highest refresh rate potential. For a more visually rich experience, 1440p High at 74 FPS offers a good compromise, while 4K is only viable at Low (69 FPS) or Medium (54 FPS) settings for those prioritizing resolution over quality.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 1605 out of 2872 tested combinations places it in the 56th percentile among all pairings tested in Evolve. This is a middling result, which aligns with the component-level data: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti sits in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU drags the overall ranking down, as the graphics card becomes the limiting factor in most scenarios.
Looking at the GPU's nearest rivals, the GTX 1080 Ti's average benchmark score of 15548 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon R9 M380 at 15521, a difference of only 0.2%. It is also close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, which scores 15290, a 1.7% difference. This indicates that the GTX 1080 Ti, while older, still competes with more modern cards in raw compute benchmarks. However, in Evolve, its age shows in the measured FPS, as the game's engine likely benefits from newer architectural features found in the RTX series.
The CPU's nearest rivals highlight its strong performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030, just 0.1% below the Core Ultra 5 235's 46062 average. The Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098, which is 0.1% higher. This tight grouping indicates that the Core Ultra 5 235 is competitive with high-end mobile and desktop processors from the previous generation. In Evolve, this CPU strength means the combo's ranking is not hindered by processor performance, but rather by the GPU's inability to keep pace at higher resolutions.
The ranking data suggests that this combo would be better served by pairing the Core Ultra 5 235 with a more powerful GPU. The current pairing creates an imbalance where the CPU's capabilities are underutilized in GPU-bound scenarios, particularly at 1440p and 4K. The 1605th rank out of 2872 combos indicates that most tested pairings offer either a more balanced performance profile or higher absolute frame rates in this specific title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. The Low preset produces an average of 181 FPS, which is the single highest measured average in the entire dataset. The Medium preset achieves 140 FPS with a minimum of 119 and maximum of 161 FPS, showing a 42 FPS variance. High settings reduce the average to 110 FPS, while Ultra drops significantly to 76 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra represents a 58% reduction in average FPS, demonstrating that quality settings have a massive impact at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low settings deliver 121 FPS, which is still highly playable. Medium settings average 94 FPS with a range of 80 to 108 FPS, a 28 FPS spread that shows less variance than at 1080p. High settings produce 74 FPS, and Ultra drops to 51 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 70 FPS, which is a 58% reduction, matching the percentage drop seen at 1080p. This consistency reinforces that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the relative cost of each quality tier remains constant regardless of resolution.
At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates at higher settings. Low settings yield 69 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Medium settings average 54 FPS with a minimum of 45 and maximum of 62 FPS, placing the average just below the 60 FPS target. High settings drop to 42 FPS, and Ultra falls to 29 FPS, which is below the threshold for a smooth experience. The 40 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K represents the same 58% reduction seen at lower resolutions, confirming that the GPU's performance scales linearly with quality settings.
The medium settings data provides the only frame time consistency information. At 4K, the 45 to 62 FPS range shows a 17 FPS spread, which is the tightest of any resolution. At 1440p, the spread widens to 28 FPS, and at 1080p, it widens further to 42 FPS. This pattern suggests that as the GPU becomes more stressed at higher resolutions, frame delivery becomes more consistent, likely because the GPU is consistently saturated and frame pacing is more uniform. At lower resolutions, the GPU finishes frames faster, and the CPU's frame delivery becomes more variable, creating wider fluctuations.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the decisive component in this pairing, and its specifications explain the measured results. The GPU's 11 GB of GDDR5X memory on a 352-bit bus provides 484.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for Evolve's textures and geometry. The game, released in 2015, would not exceed this capacity even at 4K Ultra settings, so memory is not the limiting factor. Instead, the GPU's compute capabilities, measured at 11.34 TFLOPS FP32, are the primary constraint at higher resolutions.
The GPU's clock speeds of 1481 MHz base and 1582 MHz boost are modest by modern standards, but they are paired with 3584 shading units and 224 texture mapping units. This configuration allows the GPU to process pixel-heavy workloads effectively, as evidenced by the 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 354.4 GTexel/s texture rate. However, in Evolve, the 4K results show that these specifications are insufficient to maintain 60 FPS at High settings, where the average drops to 42 FPS.
The GPU's benchmark scores provide context for its performance in this game. Its Passmark G3D score of 18600 places it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 15548 is competitive with the AMD Radeon R9 M380 (15521, 0.2% difference) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (15290, 1.7% difference). This suggests that the GTX 1080 Ti is still a capable card in synthetic tests, but Evolve's specific rendering requirements may not favor its Pascal architecture.
The GPU's 16 nm process node and 11,800 million transistors on a 471 mm² die represent older technology compared to the CPU's 3 nm process. This generational gap is evident in the efficiency of the two components, with the GPU consuming 250 W TDP versus the CPU's 65 W. In Evolve, this power differential translates to the GPU being the performance limiter at all resolutions above 1080p, as its older architecture cannot keep pace with the modern CPU's frame generation capabilities.
The GPU's DirectX 12 support at feature level 12_1 ensures compatibility with Evolve's rendering pipeline, but its Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support may not be fully utilized by the game's engine. The measured FPS data indicates that the GPU's performance scales predictably with both resolution and quality settings, confirming that its role is to provide raw rendering throughput rather than any specialized features that would give it an advantage in this title.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's priority between frame rate and visual fidelity. For maximum smoothness at 1080p, the Low preset delivers 181 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate displays or competitive play. However, the jump to Medium at 140 FPS still offers excellent fluidity while providing better visual quality, making it the recommended choice for most 1080p users. The High preset at 110 FPS remains above the 60 FPS threshold, while Ultra at 76 FPS is the minimum recommended for a playable experience at this resolution.
At 1440p, the data suggests that High settings provide the best balance. The 74 FPS average is above the 60 FPS target and offers a substantial visual improvement over Low at 121 FPS. Medium at 94 FPS is also viable for those who prefer higher frame rates, but the difference between Medium and High is only 20 FPS, while High's visual improvements are likely worth the trade-off. Ultra at 51 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold and is not recommended for general play, as the frame rate dips may be noticeable.
For 4K users, the choices are more constrained. Low settings at 69 FPS is the only preset that consistently exceeds 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for players who prioritize smoothness. Medium at 54 FPS is playable but may experience occasional dips to 45 FPS, as shown in the min/max data. High at 42 FPS and Ultra at 29 FPS are not recommended, as they fall well below the threshold for comfortable gameplay. Users who insist on 4K should accept the visual compromises of Low settings or consider reducing the resolution to 1440p for a better experience.
The medium settings data, with its min/max FPS, offers insight into frame consistency. At 1080p Medium, the 119 to 161 FPS range shows significant variance, which may cause perceptible stuttering. At 1440p Medium, the 80 to 108 FPS range is tighter, and at 4K Medium, the 45 to 62 FPS range is the most consistent. This suggests that users who are sensitive to frame pacing issues may prefer higher resolutions where the GPU is more consistently saturated, even if the average FPS is lower.
The overall recommendation is to prioritize 1440p High settings as the default configuration for this combo. This setup achieves 74 FPS, which is smooth, and takes advantage of the GTX 1080 Ti's capabilities without overburdening the GPU. For users with 1080p displays, Medium at 140 FPS offers the best combination of fluidity and quality. 4K is only viable at Low settings, and users should be prepared for a significant reduction in visual quality to maintain playable frame rates.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 235
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Evolve
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 69.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 42.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 121.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 94.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 74.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 51.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 181.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 140.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 110.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 76.0 |
Evolve with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Evolve with GTX 1080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + GTX 1080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.