Evolve

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800M is a mobile combination aimed at delivering solid 1080p and 1440p gaming. In Evolve, the measured results show a clear picture of what this setup can do, with performance scaling predictably across resolution and quality presets. This analysis breaks down the data for this specific CPU-GPU pairing, focusing on frame rates, resolution behavior, and where this combo stands among other tested configurations.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset to use for Evolve at 1920x1080 with this combo?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset delivers an average of 163 FPS, while Medium produces 126 FPS, High produces 99 FPS, and Ultra drops to 69 FPS. For maximum smoothness on a high-refresh display, Low is the top choice; for a balance of visuals and speed, Medium offers a strong 126 FPS average.

Q: How does the combo perform at 2560x1440 compared to 1080p?

A: At 1440p, the average frame rates drop significantly. The Low preset averages 109 FPS, Medium averages 85 FPS, High averages 66 FPS, and Ultra averages 46 FPS. This represents a roughly 33% reduction from the 1080p Low figure to the 1440p Low figure, indicating the GPU becomes more stressed as pixel count rises.

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Evolve?

A: At 3840x2160, the results are mixed. The Low preset averages 62 FPS, which is playable, but Medium averages 48 FPS, High averages 38 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. Only Low settings provide a consistently playable experience at 4K, while higher presets fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested combinations for Evolve?

A: This combo ranks 1918 out of 2872 total tested combinations. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, meaning many other CPU-GPU pairings deliver higher frame rates in this specific game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has an average benchmark score of 29093. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, scores 29123, which is a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, a delta of -0.6%, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 28940, a delta of +0.5%. The CPU is essentially tied with these rivals, with performance differences under 1%.

Q: How does the GPU stack up against its nearest competitors in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M has an average benchmark score of 27883. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, scores 27839 with a delta of +0.2%. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 28020 with a delta of -0.5%, and the AMD FirePro S7150 scores 28117 with a delta of -0.8%. These differences are minimal, indicating the GPU performs on par with these older or workstation-focused cards.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800M is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base clock is 1295 MHz, with a boost clock of 2335 MHz and a game clock of 2145 MHz. This memory capacity and bandwidth are critical for Evolve, a game that can be demanding on textures and geometry at higher resolutions.

In Evolve, the GPU’s role becomes evident when looking at the frame rate scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 163 FPS, which suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data. However, as resolution increases, the GPU’s computational load grows. At 1440p Low, the average drops to 109 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 62 FPS. This pattern shows the RX 7800M is the primary limiter at higher resolutions, with its 3840 shading units and 96 ROPs having to render significantly more pixels.

The GPU’s FP32 performance of 35.87 TFLOPS and texture rate of 560.4 GTexel/s indicate strong raw compute capabilities. In practice, this translates to the ability to handle Evolve’s effects and particle systems at medium settings without major hitches. The 12 GB VRAM is also a key asset; even at 4K Ultra, the game may use a substantial amount of memory, but this buffer helps prevent stuttering from memory swapping. The measured data shows that at 1440p Medium, the average FPS is 85, with minimums of 72 and maximums of 97, demonstrating the GPU can maintain a reasonably stable frame delivery when not pushed to its limits.

The GPU’s percentile rank of 73 against all GPUs indicates it outperforms most currently available graphics cards. However, its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, which is an older card, suggesting the RX 7800M is competitive with previous generation high-end parts but not necessarily a top-tier current model. In Evolve specifically, the GPU’s performance ceiling is reached at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 26, making that setting essentially unplayable. This highlights that while the GPU is capable, Evolve’s Ultra preset at 4K demands more than this mobile solution can deliver.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent decline as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the Low preset, the average frame rates are 163 FPS at 1080p, 109 FPS at 1440p, and 62 FPS at 4K. This represents a 33% drop when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 43% drop from 1440p to 4K. The pattern is similar across all settings, with Medium going from 126 FPS at 1080p to 85 FPS at 1440p and 48 FPS at 4K. High settings produce 99 FPS at 1080p, 66 FPS at 1440p, and 38 FPS at 4K. Ultra is the most demanding, with 69 FPS at 1080p, 46 FPS at 1440p, and 26 FPS at 4K.

These numbers indicate that the limiting component shifts depending on the resolution. At 1080p, the CPU’s performance is more relevant; the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H’s 14 cores and 18 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, are sufficient to push high frame rates. The 163 FPS at Low suggests the CPU is not the bottleneck, as the GPU is still able to render frames quickly. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The RX 7800M’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 96 ROPs are overwhelmed by the pixel count, leading to much lower frame rates.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is relatively modest, with an average drop of about 30-35% across presets. This suggests that at 1440p, the combo is still well-balanced, with neither the CPU nor GPU being drastically overworked. The jump to 4K is more severe, with average drops of 50-60% compared to 1440p. This is typical for a mobile GPU, as the sheer number of pixels at 3840x2160 requires significantly more processing power. The data shows that for a smooth experience, 1440p is the sweet spot for this combo, with Medium presets delivering 85 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS standard for most gamers.

The minimum and maximum FPS values for Medium settings provide additional insight. At 1080p Medium, the range is 107 to 145 FPS, showing some variance but overall stability. At 1440p Medium, the range is 72 to 97 FPS, which is a narrower band, indicating the frame pacing is more consistent. At 4K Medium, the average is 48 FPS, but no min/max data is provided, suggesting the frame rate may fluctuate more. This behavior points to the GPU being the limiting factor at 4K, as it struggles to maintain a steady output under heavy load.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested CPU-GPU combinations for Evolve, this pairing ranks 1918 out of 2872 total combos. This places it in the 33rd percentile of all tested setups, meaning roughly two-thirds of combinations deliver higher frame rates in this game. This rank is influenced by both the CPU and GPU’s individual performance levels, as well as how they interact in Evolve’s specific workload.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has a percentile rank of 81 against all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 81% of processors in synthetic benchmarks. Its average benchmark score of 29093 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, which scores 29123. This means the CPU is not a weak link in the combo; it is a solid performer that can handle modern games. The GPU, however, has a percentile rank of 73 against all GPUs, which is lower than the CPU’s rank. This suggests the GPU is more of a limiting factor in overall system performance.

The combo’s rank of 1918 is below the median of 1436 (half of 2872), indicating it falls in the lower half of tested configurations. This is not surprising given the GPU’s mobile nature; the RX 7800M is designed for laptops and has a TDP of 180 W, which is lower than many desktop GPUs. In comparison, the GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, both of which are older or workstation-oriented parts. The RX 7800M outperforms these in synthetic benchmarks by a margin of less than 1%, so it is a competitive mobile option, but it cannot match the performance of higher-end desktop GPUs.

The measured FPS data supports this ranking. At 1080p, the combo delivers playable frame rates across all settings, but at 4K, only Low settings are viable. This indicates that the combo is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming, where it can offer high refresh rates at medium or high settings. The rank of 1918 reflects this reality: it is a competent mid-range solution, but not a top-tier performer for Evolve. Users seeking higher frame rates at 4K would need a more powerful GPU, while those targeting 1080p will find this combo more than adequate.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the resolution and the user’s performance goals. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 99 FPS, which is smooth for most displays. However, the Ultra preset drops to 69 FPS, which is still playable but may not be ideal for competitive play. The Medium preset offers 126 FPS, providing a good balance between visual quality and speed. For users with a 144 Hz or higher refresh rate monitor, Low at 163 FPS is the best choice to maximize frame rates, though it sacrifices visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the strongest recommendation, with an average of 85 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold and offers better visuals than Low, which averages 109 FPS but has reduced detail. High at 66 FPS is also playable, but Medium provides a more comfortable margin for frame drops. Ultra at 46 FPS is borderline, as it may feel less responsive during intense action scenes. The data shows that Medium is the sweet spot for 1440p, balancing visual quality and performance.

At 3840x2160, the options are more limited. The Low preset averages 62 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target, making it the only setting that provides a consistently smooth experience. Medium drops to 48 FPS, which is playable but may exhibit stuttering in demanding scenes. High at 38 FPS and Ultra at 26 FPS are not recommended for a good experience, as they fall well below playable thresholds. For 4K, users should stick to Low settings or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for a better balance.

The measured rows also show that the minimum FPS for Medium settings at 1080p is 107, at 1440p is 72, and no data for 4K. This suggests that Medium settings maintain a reasonable frame floor, which is important for avoiding sudden hitches. The High and Ultra presets lack min/max data, but their lower averages imply a higher risk of frame drops. For the best experience, Medium settings at 1440p or 1080p are recommended, as they provide a solid combination of frame rate and stability.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo’s performance is strong across all presets. The Low preset averages 163 FPS, which is the highest measured value for this resolution. Medium averages 126 FPS, with a minimum of 107 FPS and a maximum of 145 FPS, showing a stable frame delivery. High averages 99 FPS, and Ultra averages 69 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combo can easily handle Evolve, with even Ultra settings providing a playable experience.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop, but remain solid for most presets. Low averages 109 FPS, Medium averages 85 FPS with a minimum of 72 FPS and a maximum of 97 FPS, High averages 66 FPS, and Ultra averages 46 FPS. The Medium preset’s min/max range shows a consistent performance, with the 72 FPS minimum still above the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra are lower, with Ultra falling below 60 FPS, indicating that it may not be suitable for smooth gameplay at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the performance is more limited. Low averages 62 FPS, which is just playable, while Medium averages 48 FPS, High averages 38 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. No min/max data is provided for most 4K presets, but the averages suggest that only Low settings provide a reliable experience. The Medium preset’s lack of min/max data also makes it harder to assess stability, but the 48 FPS average is below the 60 FPS target.

Comparing the resolutions, the 1080p Medium preset delivers 126 FPS, which is 41 FPS higher than the 1440p Medium preset’s 85 FPS. The 4K Medium preset at 48 FPS is 37 FPS lower than the 1440p Medium. This pattern holds across all presets, with 1080p being the fastest, followed by 1440p, and 4K being the slowest. The data clearly shows that 1080p is the resolution where this combo excels, while 4K requires significant compromises in settings to maintain playable frame rates.