Evolve

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers a remarkably fluid experience in Evolve, with the data showing it ranks in the 83rd percentile of all tested configurations. The pairing is exceptionally well-balanced for this title, though the measured results reveal a clear ceiling at 4K Ultra settings where neither component can fully compensate for the game's demanding rendering load.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 9 9900X3D brings a 12-core, 24-thread configuration based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The processor's 128 MB of L3 cache is a substantial asset in Evolve, a game that frequently loads complex monster and environment assets. The data indicates the CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 13795 and single-thread score of 1269 are both strong, and this translates into consistent frame delivery across all tested settings.

The CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals reinforces its capability. The data shows it is 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF in average benchmark score, yet it leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K by 1.3%, the Intel Xeon 6505P by 2%, and the Intel Core i7-14700F by 2.1%. This tight grouping at the top of the benchmarks suggests that the 9900X3D is not a bottleneck in Evolve, even when the GPU is under maximum stress. The processor's 4 nm process node from TSMC and 120 W TDP indicate an efficient design that maintains high clocks without excessive power draw, which is beneficial for sustained gaming sessions.

The 24 threads are more than sufficient for Evolve, which is a 2015 release with a primary focus on GPU-bound rendering. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 and single-core score of 6739 show that both multi-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads are handled with authority. In the measured FPS data, there is no evidence of CPU-induced frame drops; the minimum FPS values recorded at Medium settings (73 FPS at 4K, 129 FPS at 1440p, 192 FPS at 1080p) are all well within playable ranges. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and DDR5 support further ensure that data flows efficiently to the GPU, avoiding any starvation scenarios.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The RTX 4070 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus. Its memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s is a critical specification for Evolve at high resolutions, where texture streaming and shadow details consume bandwidth rapidly. The GPU's base clock of 1980 MHz and boost clock of 2475 MHz provide the raw compute throughput needed to maintain the high frame rates observed in the data. The 7168 shading units and 224 texture mapping units are well-utilized in this title, which relies heavily on pixel and texture processing.

The GPU's benchmark scores demonstrate its capability. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 and Passmark G3D score of 29995 place it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score, with the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at -0.1%, the RTX 5050 Mobile at -0.1%, the Quadro M6000 at -0.2%, and the RTX 4090 Mobile at -1%. This indicates the 4070 SUPER is a high-tier performer that is well-matched to the 9900X3D's output.

The 12 GB VRAM capacity proves sufficient for Evolve at all tested resolutions and settings. The most demanding configuration — 4K Ultra — runs at an average of 47 FPS, which suggests the GPU is fully engaged but does not encounter memory capacity limits that would cause stuttering. The FP32 compute throughput of 35.48 TFLOPS and the 56 RT cores provide headroom for the game's lighting and particle effects. The GPU's pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s are directly relevant to Evolve's fast-paced action, where high pixel throughput ensures smooth rendering of on-screen effects.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo achieve a stable 60 FPS at 4K in Evolve?*

A: The data shows an average of 68 FPS at 4K High and 86 FPS at 4K Medium, but at 4K Ultra the average drops to 47 FPS. Therefore, 60 FPS is achievable at High settings, but not at Ultra.

Q: How does the 9900X3D compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF?

A: The 9900X3D is 0.6% behind the Ultra 5 245KF in average benchmark score, making the difference statistically negligible for gaming performance.

Q: What is the performance gap between the RTX 4070 SUPER and the RTX 4090 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER is 1% ahead of the RTX 4090 Mobile in average benchmark score, indicating it outpaces that mobile flagship.

*Q: Is the 12 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming in Evolve?*

A: Yes, the data shows playable results at 4K High (68 FPS) and Medium (86 FPS), with no evidence of VRAM-related stutters in the measured rows.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maximize frame rate?

A: At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 292 FPS average, and at 1440p Low it reaches 196 FPS. For high refresh-rate monitors, 1080p or 1440p Low/Medium provide the highest frame rates.

Q: How does the combo's rank of 616 out of 3700 translate to real-world performance?

A: The rank places the combo in the top 17% of all tested configurations, which corresponds to the strong average FPS values observed across all resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 616th out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve, placing it comfortably in the top 17% of all configurations. This ranking is a direct reflection of the measured FPS data, which shows the combo excels at 1080p and 1440p but encounters limitations at 4K Ultra. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs combine to form a cohesive system that performs above the median in every test.

The data indicates that the combo is particularly strong at lower resolutions, where the CPU and GPU can both operate at high utilization without hitting the 4K rendering wall. At 1080p Low, the average FPS of 292 is exceptional, and even at 1080p Ultra, the 123 FPS average is smooth for most displays. The 1440p results are similarly impressive, with a 196 FPS average at Low settings and 119 FPS at High. The 4K results are more mixed, with the 111 FPS average at Low settings showing the GPU's raw power, but the 47 FPS at Ultra highlighting the limits of this pairing for maximum fidelity at that resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 3840x2160, the combo delivers 68 FPS average on High, 111 FPS on Low, 86 FPS on Medium, and 47 FPS on Ultra. The Medium setting includes min/max values of 73 and 99 FPS, showing a frame time variance that remains within acceptable bounds for a shooter. The 4K data reveals a clear progression: dropping from Ultra to High increases average FPS by 45%, and from High to Medium adds another 26%.

At 2560x1440, the performance is notably stronger. High settings produce a 119 FPS average, Low produces 196 FPS, Medium produces 152 FPS with min/max of 129/174, and Ultra produces 82 FPS. The 1440p results are particularly well-suited for high refresh-rate monitors, as even the Ultra setting maintains an 82 FPS average that is above the 60 FPS baseline. The jump from 4K to 1440p at High settings represents a 75% increase in average FPS, demonstrating the scalability of the combo.

At 1920x1080, the combo reaches its performance peak. The Low setting yields a massive 292 FPS average, Medium produces 226 FPS with min/max of 192/260, High produces 177 FPS, and Ultra still maintains a solid 123 FPS. The 1080p data confirms that this pairing is overkill for standard 60 Hz displays, as even the most demanding preset exceeds that threshold by more than double. The minimum FPS at 1080p Medium (192 FPS) is higher than the average FPS at 4K High (68 FPS), illustrating the resolution scaling characteristics.

Settings Recommendations

For users with a 3840x2160 display, the High preset is the optimal choice based on the measured data. It delivers an average of 68 FPS, which provides a smooth experience for a fast-paced FPS, whereas the Ultra preset drops to 47 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for comfortable play. The Medium preset at 86 FPS is also viable for users who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, but the High preset strikes the best balance between image quality and performance.

For 2560x1440 displays, the High preset is the clear winner, delivering 119 FPS average. This is sufficient for 120 Hz monitors and provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium (152 FPS) without a substantial performance cost. The Ultra preset at 82 FPS is also playable, but the 37 FPS gap between High and Ultra suggests that High is the more efficient choice for maintaining high frame rates. Low at 196 FPS is recommended only for competitive players who prioritize maximum responsiveness over visuals.

For 1920x1080 displays, users have the freedom to choose any preset based on their preferences. The Ultra preset at 123 FPS is fully playable and offers the best visual experience, while the High preset at 177 FPS is ideal for 144 Hz monitors. The Medium preset at 226 FPS is suitable for 240 Hz displays, and the Low preset at 292 FPS is the best option for esports-level performance. The data suggests that the combo is never CPU-limited at 1080p, as even the highest FPS values are constrained by the GPU's rendering capacity rather than the processor's throughput.