Evolve

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a solid, if not spectacular, experience in Evolve, a 2015 FPS title that remains sensitive to both CPU and GPU loads. Benchmark results show a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions, with the CPU’s high thread count ensuring the GPU is rarely the bottleneck at lower settings. The data indicates that this combo ranks in the 51st percentile of all tested configurations, placing it squarely in the middle of the pack for this specific game.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Granite Ridge die. It operates with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, drawing a 120 W TDP. This processor features a substantial 128 MB L3 cache, which is critical for gaming workloads that rely on rapid data access. The CPU’s 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth via dual-channel DDR5 support ensures that data flows efficiently to the cores. In synthetic benchmarks, the processor scores particularly well in multi-threaded tests, achieving a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 and a Geekbench multicore score of 22884, indicating exceptional parallel processing capabilities.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the 9900X3D holds its ground firmly. The data shows a 1.3% lead over the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, which scores 54053, and a 2.1% advantage over the Intel Core i7-14700F. It is slightly behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF by 0.6%, a negligible margin that places these processors in the same performance tier. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs underscores its high-end positioning. For Evolve, this processing power translates into consistent frame pacing, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor.

The relationship between the CPU and the game’s performance is evident in the measured FPS data. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 192 FPS on average. This high frame rate is a direct result of the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1269, which prevents the game logic and physics from becoming a bottleneck. Even when the settings are raised to Ultra at this resolution, the average FPS drops to 81, a significant reduction that suggests the GPU is starting to struggle, but the CPU continues to provide ample headroom. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 12490 and max-thread score of 13795 show that the CPU can handle the game’s background tasks without impacting primary frame generation.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and features the Navi 22 chip. It comes equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The GPU’s boost clock is rated at 2581 MHz, with a game clock of 2424 MHz and a base clock of 2321 MHz. With 2560 shading units and 40 ray accelerators, the card is capable of DirectX 12 Ultimate rendering, though Evolve does not utilize ray tracing. The GPU’s 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a texture rate of 413.0 GTexel/s highlight its raw compute abilities. In synthetic tests, the card achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2435 and a Passmark G3D score of 19786, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU’s performance is closely aligned with its nearest competitors. The data shows a 0% deltaPct against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, indicating nearly identical average benchmark scores. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 by 0.5% but leads the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell by 1.1%. This positioning suggests that the RX 6700 XT is a capable mid-to-high-range card, but it is not designed for extreme 4K workloads. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for Evolve’s textures, which were designed in 2015 and are not particularly demanding by modern standards.

The GPU’s role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate plummets to 31 FPS, a clear indication that the GPU is overwhelmed by the pixel count. The card’s pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s is insufficient for 4K Ultra in this title. However, at 2560x1440 with High settings, the combo delivers a playable 78 FPS, showing that the GPU can handle the load when the resolution is reduced. The memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s proves adequate for the game’s data streaming requirements, preventing stutters in most scenarios.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Examining the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 117 FPS, which is smooth for a fast-paced FPS. The Medium preset offers a higher average of 149 FPS, with measured minimums of 127 FPS and maximums of 171 FPS, providing a more consistent and responsive experience. The Low preset pushes the average to 192 FPS, but the visual fidelity loss is significant. The Ultra preset, while visually superior, drops the average to 81 FPS, which is still playable but introduces a noticeable reduction in smoothness compared to the lower presets.

For 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the standout choice. It achieves an average of 100 FPS, with minimums of 85 FPS and maximums of 115 FPS. This provides a good balance between visual quality and performance, ensuring that the game remains fluid during combat sequences. The High preset at 78 FPS is also viable, but the Medium preset’s higher frame rate and tighter frame time variance make it the better option for competitive play. The Low preset at 129 FPS is excessive for the visual compromise required, while the Ultra preset at 54 FPS starts to feel sluggish.

At 3840x2160, the options are limited. The Low preset is the only setting that achieves a comfortable frame rate, averaging 73 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 57 FPS, which is borderline for a shooter, with minimums of 48 FPS that could lead to noticeable hitches. The High preset at 45 FPS is below the threshold for smooth gameplay, and the Ultra preset at 31 FPS is unplayable. For 4K, the recommendation is to use the Low preset to maintain a playable experience, or to reduce the resolution to 2560x1440 and use Medium for a better overall experience.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT ranks 1480 out of 2872 tested combos in Evolve. This places the combo in the 51.5th percentile, meaning it performs better than just over half of all tested configurations. This middle-of-the-road ranking is somewhat surprising given the high-end CPU, but it is a direct consequence of the GPU’s limitations at higher resolutions. The CPU’s ability to deliver high frame rates is capped by the GPU’s rendering capacity.

The ranking reflects the balance of the system. In scenarios where the GPU is the bottleneck, such as 4K Ultra, the combo performs poorly, dragging down the overall rank. Conversely, at 1080p Low, the combo excels, but this only represents a fraction of the possible settings. The data suggests that the combo is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p, where the GPU can keep pace with the CPU’s processing power. The fact that the combo ranks below the 60th percentile indicates that there are many other combinations that offer better performance in this specific game, likely those with more powerful GPUs.

The high CPU percentile (91st) compared to the GPU percentile (72nd) highlights a potential imbalance. The CPU is overqualified for the GPU’s capabilities, meaning that the system’s performance is frequently limited by the graphics card. This is not necessarily a negative, as it provides headroom for future GPU upgrades, but for Evolve specifically, the combo’s rank is determined by the GPU’s ability to handle the game’s graphics load.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: The combo delivers an average of 117 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D compare to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54762, which is 1.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K’s score of 54053.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 2560x1440 with Medium settings?

A: The minimum FPS recorded at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 85 FPS, with an average of 100 FPS and a maximum of 115 FPS.

Q: Is the 3840x2160 Ultra preset playable with this configuration?

A: No, the 3840x2160 Ultra preset produces an average of only 31 FPS, which is not playable for a smooth FPS experience.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 27425, which is 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090’s score of 27565.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. All values are averages unless otherwise noted.

1920x1080: The Low preset achieves the highest average at 192 FPS. The Medium preset follows with an average of 149 FPS, with a minimum of 127 FPS and a maximum of 171 FPS. The High preset delivers 117 FPS on average. The Ultra preset is the slowest at this resolution, with an average of 81 FPS.

2560x1440: The Low preset produces an average of 129 FPS. The Medium preset offers 100 FPS on average, with a minimum of 85 FPS and a maximum of 115 FPS. The High preset averages 78 FPS. The Ultra preset drops significantly to an average of 54 FPS.

3840x2160: The Low preset is the only playable option, with an average of 73 FPS. The Medium preset averages 57 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS. The High preset averages 45 FPS. The Ultra preset is severely limited, with an average of just 31 FPS.

This data illustrates a clear performance hierarchy. The system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, maintaining above 100 FPS on Medium and High settings. At 1440p, the Medium preset provides the best balance, while 4K gaming is only feasible on the Low preset. The variance between minimum and maximum FPS at Medium settings (e.g., 127-171 at 1080p) indicates some frame time inconsistency, but the overall averages are sufficient for a responsive experience. The Ultra preset at all resolutions shows a substantial performance penalty, suggesting it is best avoided unless the user prioritizes visual fidelity over frame rate.