Evolve

Evolve, a 2015 FPS, is a game where this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti produces a measured performance profile that is strong but not at the top of the database. The combo ranks 411th out of 1,695 tested combinations in Evolve, with the FPS results marked as measured data. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an aggregate benchmark score of 34,313, while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile with an aggregate benchmark score of 41,224. Across three resolutions and four quality settings, the measured data shows a clear, consistent scaling pattern.

How This Combo Ranks

The database places this exact combination at rank 411 out of 1,695 entries for Evolve. That rank is derived from measured FPS results, not from synthetic averages, which makes it a direct statement about how this CPU and GPU behave together in this specific title.

Individual component rankings add context. The Ryzen 7 7700X is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop part from AMD's 7000 series, built on Zen 4 with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its aggregate benchmark score of 34,313 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are extremely close: the Intel Core i5-13500 scores 34,175 with a deltaPct of 0.4, the Intel Core i7-12800HX scores 34,136 with a deltaPct of 0.5, the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34,584 with a deltaPct of -0.8, and the AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34,599 with a deltaPct of -0.8. In other words, the 7700X is positioned in the middle of a tight cluster where the largest separation from a direct rival is 0.8%.

On the GPU side, the RTX 3080 Ti has an aggregate benchmark average of 41,224. That puts it at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 at 41,441 with a deltaPct of -0.5, the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 at 41,610 with a deltaPct of -0.9, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 at 41,687 with a deltaPct of -1.1, and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 at 41,897 with a deltaPct of -1.6. This means the 3080 Ti trails that group by margins of 0.5%, 0.9%, 1.1%, and 1.6%, respectively. The Evolve rank reflects this combination of a top-tier CPU and a high-end GPU, but the game's measured FPS curve shows that the GPU's rendering throughput is the dominant factor in the final ranking.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is built on the GA102 chip using the Ampere architecture and is fabricated on an 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors. The GPU has a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz. Memory runs at 1188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective transfer speed, and the 12 GB GDDR6X frame buffer connects to a 384-bit bus, producing 912.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The shader configuration includes 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 80 ray-tracing cores, and 320 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 186.5 GPixel/s, texture rate is 532.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 34.10 TFLOPS.

These specifications show up in the Evolve results as a smooth setting-to-setting FPS curve rather than a memory-capacity cliff. At 4K, the Low preset averages 97.4 FPS, Medium averages 76.1 FPS, High averages 63 FPS, and Ultra averages 44.9 FPS. The 12 GB VRAM does not appear to be a limiting factor in the measured data; the same GPU produces 263.6 FPS at 1080p Low and 109.8 FPS at 1080p Ultra, so frame rate changes are driven by render workload and clock behavior rather than by hitting a memory ceiling. The boost clock of 1665 MHz and the 912.4 GB/s memory bandwidth are the most relevant clock and bandwidth values to these results, since the 4K Ultra preset is the lowest measured average in the entire set.

The GPU's benchmark percentile of 83 and its close deltaPct gaps to higher-scoring rivals show that the 3080 Ti is in a competitive tier. In Evolve, that translates into 4K performance that remains within measurable range across all four quality presets, with the largest FPS cost appearing on the Ultra preset.

FAQ

Q: What is this combo's rank in Evolve?

A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ranks 411th out of 1,695 tested combinations in Evolve. The data for this rank is marked as measured, not estimated.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti compare to its nearest GPU rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an aggregate benchmark score of 41,224 and sits at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 by 0.5%, the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 by 0.9%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 by 1.1%, and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 by 1.6%, based on the deltaPct values in the nearest-rival data.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7700X compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700X has an aggregate benchmark score of 34,313 and sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500 and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800HX, while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H and the AMD EPYC 4244P by 0.8% each.

Q: What are the best and worst measured FPS results for this combo in Evolve?

A: The best measured result is at 1920x1080 Low, where the average FPS is 263.6. The worst measured result is at 3840x2160 Ultra, where the average FPS is 44.9.

Q: Does the combo maintain high FPS at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS is 173.8 on Low, 136.1 on Medium, 109 on High, and 75.5 on Ultra. Every measured 1440p preset stays above 75 FPS.

Q: What does the measured data include besides average FPS?

A: The measured FPS array contains only average FPS values for this title. The minFps and maxFps fields are null for every resolution and settings combination, so the analysis is based on average FPS alone.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS results are organized by resolution and settings in the table below.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 263.6 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 204.3 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 161.3 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 109.8 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 173.8 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 136.1 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 109 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 75.5 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 97.4 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 76.1 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 63 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 44.9 |

At 1080p, the spread from Low to Ultra is large: Low produces 263.6 FPS, Medium 204.3 FPS, High 161.3 FPS, and Ultra 109.8 FPS. At 1440p, the same quality progression yields 173.8, 136.1, 109, and 75.5 FPS. At 4K, the averages fall to 97.4, 76.1, 63, and 44.9 FPS. The data shows a monotonic relationship in every settings row: as resolution increases, average FPS decreases, and within every resolution, average FPS decreases as settings increase.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling pattern is consistent across all four settings. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 costs a substantial number of frames at every quality tier. Low drops from 263.6 to 173.8 FPS, Medium drops from 204.3 to 136.1 FPS, High drops from 161.3 to 109 FPS, and Ultra drops from 109.8 to 75.5 FPS.

The transition from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is even heavier in absolute terms. Low falls from 173.8 to 97.4 FPS, Medium falls from 136.1 to 76.1 FPS, High falls from 109 to 63 FPS, and Ultra falls from 75.5 to 44.9 FPS. The gap between 1080p Low and 4K Ultra is the widest in the entire measured set, spanning from 263.6 FPS down to 44.9 FPS.

This behavior is the classic shape of a GPU-bound workload at higher resolutions. The CPU's aggregate benchmark score is in the 89th percentile, and its nearest-rival deltaPct values are all within 0.8%, so the CPU tier is effectively fixed. The large FPS drops that accompany each resolution increase point to the GPU's rendering throughput as the controlling constraint. At 1080p Low, the very high 263.6 FPS result suggests the CPU is able to keep the GPU fed at the lowest render load, but the database does not include direct CPU utilization data. At 4K, the FPS results are driven down by the increased pixel workload, and the fact that 4K Low at 97.4 FPS is still above 1440p Ultra at 75.5 FPS shows that settings can have as large an impact as resolution in this title.