Evolve

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER pairing delivers a decisive performance tier for Evolve, a 2015 FPS title that is heavily optimized for modern hardware. The benchmark data indicates that this combination is capable of obliterating standard refresh rate targets at nearly every setting, with the primary constraint emerging only at 4K Ultra where the GPU’s limits become apparent. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance data, offering a practical guide for configuring this setup.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Evolve at 4K with high settings?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the combo produces an average of 68.4 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, making 4K High a viable option for most users.

Q: What is the best resolution for maximum frame rates?

A: The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS reaches 292.7. This is the highest measured frame rate in the dataset, indicating that the CPU-GPU combo is not a bottleneck at 1080p and can push frame rates far beyond typical high-refresh-rate monitor capabilities.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 SUPER the bottleneck in this system for Evolve?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. For instance, dropping from 2560x1440 High (118 FPS) to 3840x2160 High (68.4 FPS) represents a 42% performance loss, a scaling pattern typical of a GPU-bound scenario.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High in terms of performance?

A: The Ultra preset is significantly more demanding. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 118 on High to 81.1 on Ultra, a 31% reduction. At 4K, the drop is even sharper, from 68.4 FPS on High to 46 FPS on Ultra.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5800X holding back the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: No. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 292.7 FPS, indicating the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU a massive number of frames. The 5800X's benchmark scores, which include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571, support its ability to handle high-throughput gaming workloads without bottlenecking.

Q: What is the recommended preset for a 1440p monitor?

A: For 2560x1440, the High preset offers the best balance, delivering 118 FPS. While the Ultra preset is playable at 81.1 FPS, the High preset provides a substantial performance buffer, ensuring smoother frame pacing and more headroom for demanding scenes.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data reveals a clear hierarchy in performance scaling across presets. For this title, the "High" preset emerges as the optimal choice for most users, regardless of resolution. At 1920x1080, High produces 180.1 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any high-refresh-rate display. At 2560x1440, High maintains a commanding 118 FPS, offering a smooth and responsive experience. Even at 3840x2160, High achieves 68.4 FPS, which is comfortably playable.

The "Ultra" preset, while visually more demanding, introduces a significant performance penalty that is not justified by the data. At 1440p, the drop from High to Ultra is 36.9 FPS (118 to 81.1), and at 4K, it falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold, hitting 46 FPS. The "Medium" preset provides a middle ground, but the performance gains over High are relatively modest compared to the visual quality sacrifice. For instance, at 1440p, Medium yields 153.5 FPS compared to High's 118 FPS, but the visual fidelity reduction is substantial. The "Low" preset offers the highest frame rates, but is only recommended for competitive play at 1080p where the 292.7 FPS average can be fully utilized.

The optimal strategy is to use the High preset as a baseline. If a user has a 1440p 144Hz monitor, High is the definitive choice. For 4K users, High is also the recommended preset, as it provides the best visual experience while maintaining a frame rate above the 60 FPS standard. The data shows that the Ultra preset is simply too demanding for this GPU at 4K, and the performance cost at lower resolutions is too high to warrant its use.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling across resolutions provides insight into the system's balance. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 on High settings results in a performance drop from 180.1 FPS to 118 FPS, a 34% reduction. This is a substantial hit, but the resulting frame rate is still excellent. The scaling from 1440p to 4K (3840x2160) is even more aggressive, with the High preset dropping from 118 FPS to 68.4 FPS, a 42% reduction.

This pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload. As the resolution increases, the pixel count grows exponentially, placing a heavier load on the renderer. The CPU's role diminishes at higher resolutions, as the GPU's fill rate and shader throughput become the primary determinants of performance. The data confirms this, as the frame rate at 1080p Low (292.7 FPS) is nearly three times higher than at 4K High (68.4 FPS), highlighting the GPU's increasing dominance.

The fact that the 5800X can push 292.7 FPS at 1080p Low indicates that the CPU is not a limiting factor at any measured setting. The performance scaling is almost entirely dictated by the RTX 4070 SUPER's capabilities. This means that users with high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors can fully exploit the system's potential, while those with 4K displays will need to be more conservative with their settings to maintain high frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination ranks 287th out of 1695 tested combos for Evolve, placing it in the top 17% of all configurations. This is a strong showing, indicating that this pairing is well-suited for this specific game. The high ranking is supported by the CPU's single-thread performance, which is critical for FPS titles. The 5800X's 3DMark single-thread score of 943 and its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 demonstrate its strength in this area.

The CPU's overall average benchmark score of 27606 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (27535, deltaPct 0.3%) and the Intel Core i5-12600KF (27827, deltaPct -0.8%), show that the 5800X is a competitive mid-range processor. This performance data, combined with the GPU's 84th percentile ranking, creates a well-balanced system that excels in gaming workloads.

For Evolve specifically, the rank of 287 out of 1695 suggests that this combo is more than adequate. It is likely that the high frame rates measured are due to the game's age and the sheer headroom of the modern components. The combo is not pushing the boundaries of performance, but it is delivering a smooth and enjoyable experience that will satisfy most players.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER plays the central role in determining frame rates in Evolve, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. For a 2015 title like Evolve, this memory capacity and bandwidth are more than sufficient to handle textures and geometry at any setting without becoming a limiting factor.

The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 1980 MHz and a boost of 2475 MHz, drive its processing power. The 7168 shading units and 224 texture mapping units are responsible for the raw compute throughput, while the 80 render output units (ROPs) handle the final pixel output. The data shows that these specifications are more than enough to handle Evolve at high settings, but they are pushed to their limits at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 46.

The performance scaling across settings is a direct result of GPU load. At 1080p Low, the GPU is underutilized, allowing the CPU to push frame rates to 292.7. As settings increase to High and Ultra, the GPU's shader and ROP workload increases, causing frame rates to drop. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 and Passmark G3D score of 29995 reflect its overall capability, but the Evolve data shows that it is the primary bottleneck at 4K Ultra. The GPU's performance is the deciding factor for the experience, and the data suggests that High settings are the sweet spot for this component.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table provides the complete measured FPS data for this combo, broken down by resolution and settings.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

| :--------- | :------- | :------ |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 292.7 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 227 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 180.1 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 126 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 198.6 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 153.5 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 118 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 81.1 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 109.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 84.4 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 68.4 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 46 |

The data confirms that the system is exceptionally powerful at 1080p, with even the Ultra preset achieving 126 FPS. At 1440p, all presets remain playable, with High being the recommended choice. At 4K, the system becomes GPU-bound, and only the Low, Medium, and High presets are viable for a smooth experience, with Ultra falling below the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra at each resolution is consistent, with Ultra costing roughly 55-60% of the frame rate compared to Low. This breakdown provides a clear map for users to dial in their desired performance level.