Evolve

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER combination delivers a distinctly mixed set of results in Evolve, with performance heavily dependent on both resolution and the preset applied. The data indicates a pairing where a strong, modern processor is frequently held back by a mid-range graphics card, particularly at higher resolutions and demanding settings. The benchmark results show clear patterns of GPU limitation at 4K, while lower resolutions reveal the CPU’s capability to drive high frame rates.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Its cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 32 MB L3 cache. The CPU’s benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 and a single-core score of 3327. This places the processor in the 84th percentile versus all CPUs, indicating it is a high-performing part. Its average benchmark score of 27606 is nearly identical to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, which scores 27535 (a delta of 0.3%). This similarity suggests that the 5800X’s performance profile is well established.

In the context of Evolve, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and manage game logic. The 16 threads and high boost clock are more than sufficient for a 2015 FPS title, meaning the processor is unlikely to be the primary bottleneck in most scenarios. This is evident when looking at the measured FPS at 1080p with Low settings, where the combo achieves 125.5 FPS. This high frame rate indicates that the CPU can handle the game’s workload efficiently, allowing the GPU to operate near its maximum potential. The single-threaded performance, as measured by a 3DMark single-thread score of 943, is also robust, which is crucial for games that rely on a few primary threads. The data suggests that the Ryzen 7 5800X provides a solid foundation, but its capabilities are only fully utilized when the graphics settings are low enough not to saturate the GPU.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 74.9 FPS. This suggests a playable experience for most users, though it is significantly lower than the 125.5 FPS seen at Low settings.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 1515 out of 1695 total combos tested in Evolve. This places it in the lower tier of results, indicating that many other hardware pairings produce higher frame rates in this game.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops to 31.1 on High settings. Given the CPU’s high benchmark scores, the data strongly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, as the resolution demands more pixel-pushing power than the GTX 1660 SUPER can provide.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between Ultra and Low settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS with Ultra settings is 34.0, while Low settings yield 81.5 FPS. This represents a performance gap of 47.5 FPS, showing a heavy cost for the highest visual quality preset.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and how does it compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 14286. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11, scores 14314, which is a delta of -0.2%. This places the GTX 1660 SUPER in the 55th percentile of all GPUs, showing it is a mid-range performer.

Q: Does the data show a consistent frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K?

A: Yes, the data shows a consistent decline. For example, on High settings, the average FPS goes from 74.9 at 1080p, to 52.2 at 1440p, and finally to 31.1 at 4K. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data reveals a clear and predictable trend: performance degrades significantly as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 125.5 FPS. Moving to 1440p drops this to 81.5 FPS, and at 4K it falls further to 44.6 FPS. This pattern is consistent across all settings, showing that the GTX 1660 SUPER is the limiting factor. The GPU’s 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus width are simply not sufficient to maintain high frame rates at higher pixel counts.

For High settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 22.7 FPS (from 74.9 to 52.2), and from 1440p to 4K is 21.1 FPS (from 52.2 to 31.1). This near-linear decline in performance with resolution is a hallmark of a GPU-bound workload. The CPU, with its high multi-threaded scores, is not the limiting factor at these resolutions. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would see more consistent frame rates across resolutions, as the graphics card would be waiting on the processor. Instead, the data shows the frame rate dropping proportionally with the increase in pixel count, confirming that the GTX 1660 SUPER’s rendering capabilities are the primary constraint. The Ultra preset at 4K shows an even more severe drop to 18.4 FPS, which is barely playable and highlights the GPU’s struggle with the highest fidelity settings at that resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of the combo’s performance across various configurations. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low settings yield 125.5 FPS, Medium yields 95.0 FPS, High yields 74.9 FPS, and Ultra yields 49.6 FPS. This shows a wide range of performance, with the Ultra preset costing over 60% of the frame rate compared to Low. At this resolution, even the most demanding preset is playable, though the high frame rates at lower settings make the game feel much smoother.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS figures are 81.5 for Low, 65.9 for Medium, 52.2 for High, and 34.0 for Ultra. The performance drop is noticeable, with the Ultra preset now dipping below 60 FPS. This resolution is a compromise, as it offers a sharper image than 1080p but requires a significant reduction in settings to maintain high frame rates. At 3840x2160, the results are 44.6 FPS for Low, 34.5 FPS for Medium, 31.1 FPS for High, and 18.4 FPS for Ultra. At this resolution, only the Low preset provides a semi-playable experience, while Ultra is effectively a slideshow. The data clearly indicates that the GTX 1660 SUPER is not designed for 4K gaming, as even the lowest settings cannot consistently maintain a smooth 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo’s rank of 1515 out of 1695 tested combinations places it in the bottom 11% of all configurations. This is a low ranking, but it is important to interpret it in context. The rank reflects the absolute performance level of the CPU and GPU pair, not its efficiency or suitability. The GTX 1660 SUPER, while a capable 1080p card, is outclassed by many other GPUs in the database. Its 55th percentile standing among all GPUs is a clear indicator of its mid-range position.

The CPU’s high ranking (84th percentile) does little to boost the combo’s overall standing in Evolve, as the game’s performance is heavily dictated by the graphics card. The nearest rivals for the GPU, such as the Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics (avg score 14315) and the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (avg score 14389), have nearly identical average scores. This means the GTX 1660 SUPER is performing exactly as expected for its class. The combo’s low rank is thus a direct consequence of the GPU’s limitation, not a sign of any inefficiency in the pairing. The data suggests that to improve the rank, a more powerful GPU would be necessary, as the Ryzen 7 5800X has ample headroom to support it.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p, the High preset at 74.9 FPS offers a good balance between visual quality and smoothness. However, the Medium preset at 95.0 FPS provides a more responsive experience with only a modest reduction in visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 49.6 FPS is playable but may feel less smooth, making Medium or High the recommended choices for a competitive edge.

At 1440p, the data suggests that the Low preset (81.5 FPS) is the only option that consistently exceeds 60 FPS. The Medium preset (65.9 FPS) is also viable, but High (52.2 FPS) and Ultra (34.0 FPS) will likely result in noticeable stuttering. For a smoother experience at this resolution, the Low or Medium presets are recommended. At 4K, the situation is more challenging. The Low preset yields 44.6 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. The Medium (34.5 FPS) and High (31.1 FPS) presets are borderline, while Ultra (18.4 FPS) is not recommended for any gameplay scenario.

The best overall experience, according to the data, is at 1080p with the Medium preset, which delivers a 95.0 FPS average. This provides a high frame rate that is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay, while still maintaining a reasonable level of visual detail. For users prioritizing visual quality over frame rate, the 1080p High preset is a strong alternative. Ultimately, the data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, with lower settings required for higher resolutions.