Evolve
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 92 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 47 | 55 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 80 | 100 | 128 |
| 1080p Full HD | 81 | 116 | 149 | 191 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Evolve with AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a highly playable Evolve experience, but the data reveals a system that is clearly GPU-bound at higher resolutions and quality settings. The combination ranks in the 945th position out of 1695 tested combos, placing it in the 56th percentile of all systems tested for this title. This is a mid-pack result that leans on the strength of the CPU to push high frame rates at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes the limiting factor as graphical demands increase.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 191.1 FPS, but this drops to 128.4 FPS at 1440p and further to 71.8 FPS at 4K. This represents a 62.4% reduction in performance from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, indicating that the RX 6700 XT cannot sustain the raw throughput demanded by 4K, even with minimal graphical features enabled.
The scaling pattern becomes more pronounced as settings increase. Under Ultra settings, the frame rate falls from 81.3 FPS at 1080p to 55.1 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 34.1 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 4K at Ultra is 58.1%, which is slightly less than the Low settings drop, suggesting that the game's Ultra preset introduces effects that tax the GPU more uniformly across resolutions. The data indicates that 1080p and 1440p are the practical sweet spots for this combo, while 4K requires significant settings compromises to remain fluid.
The difference between Low and Ultra at the same resolution grows with pixel count. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 109.8 FPS (191.1 vs 81.3), but at 4K, this gap narrows to 37.7 FPS (71.8 vs 34.1). This compression at 4K is a classic sign of GPU saturation; the card is hitting its rendering ceiling, so lowering settings has diminishing returns. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads have enough headroom to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, but the RX 6700 XT's 12 GB of VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot keep pace with 4K Ultra demands.
CPU Role
The Ryzen 5 9600X's specifications are well-suited to Evolve's engine, which benefits from high single-thread performance. With a base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz, the CPU delivers strong per-core results. Its benchmark scores support this: the 3dmark single-thread score is 1253, and the cinebench_r23 single-core score is 3603, both indicating excellent single-threaded execution that matters for game logic and draw calls.
The CPU's thread configuration of 6 cores and 12 threads appears sufficient for this title. At 1080p Low settings, the 191.1 FPS result suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU is still able to render frames quickly enough to expose the CPU's potential. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 7585 and the 3dmark_max_threads score of 7590 show that scaling beyond 8 threads yields minimal gains, which aligns with a game that does not heavily utilize more than a few cores.
The CPU's performance percentile of 85 versus all CPUs places it in the upper echelon of processors, and its nearest rival comparisons show it is within 0.5% of the Intel Core i5-14500T and AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS in average benchmark scores. This means the 9600X provides consistent frame pacing in Evolve, as evidenced by the fact that at 1080p Medium, the system still achieves 149.3 FPS, which is only a 21.8% drop from Low settings. The CPU's L3 cache of 32 MB shared also helps with game data locality, reducing memory latency during intense combat scenarios.
FAQ
Q: What is the expected average frame rate at 1440p with High settings?
A: The measured data shows an average of 80.3 FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings. This is a smooth experience for most players, as it stays well above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Evolve?
A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K Low settings, the system averages 71.8 FPS, which is playable. However, increasing to 4K High drops to 47.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 34.1 FPS, indicating that 4K requires Low or Medium settings for consistent fluidity.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 9600X has an average benchmark score of 28246, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-13490F and 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 230. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS by 0.4% and the Intel Core i5-14500T by 0.5%, meaning performance is essentially neck-and-neck among these processors.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve over 100 FPS?
A: At 1080p, all settings except Ultra produce over 100 FPS. Low yields 191.1 FPS, Medium yields 149.3 FPS, and High yields 116 FPS. At 1440p, only Low settings reach above 100 FPS, with a score of 128.4 FPS.
Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for Evolve at maximum settings?
A: The RX 6700 XT comes with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is ample for this 2015 title. The measured 4K Ultra average of 34.1 FPS is limited by the GPU's compute throughput, not memory capacity, as the 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for the game's assets.
Q: How does the system rank among all tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 945th out of 1695 tested combos for Evolve. This places it in the 56th percentile overall, indicating that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it outperforms a majority of systems tested for this game.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1440p is the optimal choice. This configuration delivers 99.5 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS standard and provides a significant visual upgrade over Low settings. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs 19.2 FPS (99.5 to 80.3), which may not be worth the marginal visual gains for competitive play.
If the player prioritizes frame rate above all else, 1080p Low at 191.1 FPS is the clear winner, offering nearly double the refresh rate of a standard 60 Hz monitor. At 4K, Medium settings at 54.9 FPS is the highest preset that remains playable, while Ultra at 34.1 FPS should be avoided unless the user is willing to tolerate stutter and latency.
For a balanced experience at 1080p, High settings at 116 FPS is the recommended preset, as it provides a substantial upgrade over Medium (149.3 FPS) while still maintaining a high refresh rate. The Ultra preset at 1080p yields 81.3 FPS, which is still playable but shows a 29.9% performance penalty compared to High, suggesting that the extra effects are not efficiently implemented.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance. Low settings produce an average of 191.1 FPS, Medium drops to 149.3 FPS, High settles at 116 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 81.3 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 57.5% reduction, but even the lowest figure is well above playable thresholds.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show the GPU's growing influence. Low averages 128.4 FPS, Medium hits 99.5 FPS, High achieves 80.3 FPS, and Ultra falls to 55.1 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra is 32.2%, indicating that the GPU is being pushed harder at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the system transitions from high refresh rate territory to playable-but-modest performance. Low averages 71.8 FPS, Medium reaches 54.9 FPS, High drops to 47.1 FPS, and Ultra struggles to 34.1 FPS. The difference between 4K Medium and 4K High is only 7.8 FPS, suggesting that High settings at 4K are not significantly more demanding than Medium for this GPU.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 945 out of 1695 tested configurations places it in the middle of the field, with 56% of tested systems performing better. This position is reflective of the RX 6700 XT's mid-range standing; the GPU ranks at the 77th percentile against all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 85th percentile against all CPUs. The system's overall in-game ranking is dragged down by the GPU, which is the limiting factor in Evolve's graphically intensive scenes.
In comparison to the GPU's nearest rivals, the RX 6700 XT's average benchmark score of 33721 is 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 and 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A5000. It trails the AMD Radeon HD 7950 and AMD Radeon RX 480 by 1% each. This tight grouping in synthetic benchmarks does not translate to identical in-game performance, but it does indicate that the RX 6700 XT is competitive with these cards.
The CPU's nearest rival comparisons show a similar clustering, with the 9600X's average score of 28246 being within 0.5% of the Intel Core i5-14500T and AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, this combo would perform nearly identically to systems using those processors. However, in Evolve, the GPU bottleneck dominates, meaning the CPU's high percentile ranking does not boost the overall combo rank as much as it would in a more CPU-intensive title.
GPU Role
The RX 6700 XT's specifications explain its performance ceiling in Evolve. With a base clock of 2321 MHz and a boost clock of 2581 MHz, the card has solid raw speed, but its 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs are the key determinants of fill rate. The pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 413.0 GTexel/s suggest that the card can handle moderate resolutions well, but 4K Ultra exposes its limitations.
The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for Evolve's 2015-era assets. The memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) is adequate, but the bus width limits memory throughput compared to wider-bus cards. This is evident in the 4K results, where the card's compute throughput (13.21 TFLOPS FP32) becomes the primary constraint.
The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce the in-game data. Its passmark_g3d score of 19786 is respectable, but the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2435 shows that it is not a high-end performer in modern DirectX 12 workloads. The card's percentile of 77 against all GPUs places it above average, but the 4K Ultra result of 34.1 FPS in Evolve indicates that this is a 1080p/1440p card for demanding titles, with 4K requiring reduced settings to remain fluid. The GPU's 64 ROPs are the limiting factor for pixel-heavy scenes, which explains why lowering settings at 4K yields such significant frame rate improvements.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Evolve
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 71.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 54.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 47.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 128.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 99.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 80.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 55.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 191.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 149.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 116.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 81.3 |
Evolve with Ryzen 5 9600X + Other GPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Evolve with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 9600X + RX 6700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.