Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
120
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 120 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 43 68 83 102
1440p QHD 69 110 134 164
1080p Full HD 96 154 187 229

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 102
3840x2160 Medium 83
3840x2160 High 68
3840x2160 Ultra 43
2560x1440 Low 164
2560x1440 Medium 134
2560x1440 High 110
2560x1440 Ultra 69
1920x1080 Low 229
1920x1080 Medium 187
1920x1080 High 154
1920x1080 Ultra 96

Downfall with Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

Downfall, the 2016 horror title, remains a demanding benchmark for modern hardware, and the pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT produces a revealing set of performance data. The measured frames per second across three resolutions and four quality presets show a system with significant headroom at lower resolutions, but one that becomes increasingly constrained as pixel count and graphical fidelity rise. This analysis breaks down the scaling behavior, the roles of the GPU and CPU, and how this specific combination stacks up against the broader field of tested configurations.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination in Downfall demonstrates a classic pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At the 1920x1080 (1080p) resolution, the system delivers exceptionally high frame rates, with the Low preset achieving an average of 229 FPS. This high ceiling at 1080p suggests that the system is not bottlenecked here, and the CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU. Moving up to the High preset at 1080p yields 154 FPS, which is still a very playable and smooth experience for a horror title.

Stepping up to 2560x1440 (1440p) introduces a noticeable, but not drastic, drop in performance. The Low preset at 1440p averages 164 FPS, a 28% reduction from the 1080p Low figure. The High preset at 1440p drops to 110 FPS, a 29% reduction from its 1080p counterpart. This scaling indicates that the GPU is beginning to take on a more significant workload, but the system still maintains frame rates that are well above standard refresh rates. The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows a proportional increase in GPU load, which is expected as the pixel count grows by roughly 78%.

The jump to 3840x2160 (4K) is where the performance curve becomes steep. The High preset at 4K averages only 68 FPS, a 38% drop from the 1440p High score of 110 FPS. This significant reduction highlights that the RX 6700 XT is being pushed to its limits at this resolution. The data shows a clear trend: the scaling from 1080p to 1440p is moderate, but the scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe, indicating that the GPU's rendering capabilities are the primary limiting factor at the higher resolutions. The frame rate at 4K High, while playable, is far from the high refresh rate territory seen at 1080p.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT plays a critical role in shaping the performance landscape for this combo. Based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, this GPU is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The benchmark results for this GPU position it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27425. Its nearest rivals in terms of raw compute performance include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, which scores identically at 27435 with a 0% delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, which scores 27565, a -0.5% delta.

In the context of Downfall, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM buffer is a key asset. At 4K resolution with high-quality textures, memory capacity can become a bottleneck, but the 12 GB allocation appears sufficient to prevent such an issue from occurring, as the frame rates are primarily limited by the core compute performance. The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 2321 MHz and a boost of 2581 MHz, contribute to its peak performance. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU's compute power is the deciding factor in the higher-resolution tests. The drop from an average of 110 FPS at 1440p High to 68 FPS at 4K High is a direct consequence of the GPU's fillrate and shading capabilities being overwhelmed by the 4K pixel workload. The performance at 4K Ultra, which averages just 43 FPS, further confirms that the GPU is the limiting component at the highest settings, with the additional graphical effects causing a substantial performance penalty.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a high-end desktop processor with 24 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 3.70 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. This CPU is built on a 3 nm process and is part of the Core Ultra Series 2. Its benchmark scores are formidable; for instance, it scores 44253 in Cinebench R23 multicore, 3453 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and a Passmark multithread score of 68574. With a percentile ranking of 96% against all CPUs, it is clearly a top-tier performer. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score are the Intel Xeon 6520P, which is essentially tied with a 0% delta, and the AMD EPYC 4564P, which is slightly ahead at 1.5%.

In Downfall, the CPU's role is less about pushing frame rates to their absolute maximum and more about ensuring consistent performance without becoming a bottleneck. The data suggests the CPU is more than capable of keeping up with the GPU. The high frame rates at 1080p, such as 229 FPS on Low and 187 FPS on Medium, are evidence of the CPU's strong single-thread performance, which is crucial for game logic and draw calls. However, the fact that frame rates scale down so dramatically with resolution indicates that the GPU is the constraining factor in this pairing. The CPU's power is evident in the fact that even at 1080p High, where the CPU has to process a high number of frames, it still delivers 154 FPS. Even at 4K, the CPU does not appear to hold back the GPU, as the low FPS at 4K can be directly attributed to the GPU's workload. The 24 cores and threads ensure that any background tasks or game engine threads are handled efficiently, preventing any sudden stutters or hitches that could be problematic in a horror game.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the comprehensive database of tested hardware combinations for Downfall, the pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT secures a rank of 1489 out of 2928 total combos. This places the system in the upper-middle tier of performance, above the median but not among the absolute top performers. The rank reflects the balance between the powerful CPU and the mid-range to upper-mid-range GPU. The CPU's high percentile ranking (96%) is tempered by the GPU's more modest standing (72nd percentile), resulting in a combined performance that is solid but not class-leading.

The data indicates that while the CPU is capable of supporting much higher frame rates, the GPU's performance ceiling limits the overall combo's ranking. This is a classic case of a CPU that is overqualified for the GPU it is paired with, at least in terms of raw gaming performance. The combo's rank of 1489 suggests that there are many systems with more powerful GPUs that will outperform it, but it also means that it sits ahead of a significant portion of the field. The gap between this combo and those above it is likely due to the GPU, as upgrading to a higher-tier graphics card would likely propel this CPU to a much higher ranking. The data shows a system that is well-balanced for 1440p gaming, but which will struggle to compete with top-tier 4K systems.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate for this combo at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS for the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination in Downfall at 1920x1080 with High settings is 154 FPS.

Q: How much does the average FPS drop when moving from 1440p to 4K on High settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS is 110. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average drops to 68 FPS, a reduction of 42 FPS.

Q: Which component is more likely to be the performance bottleneck at 4K resolution?

A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. The frame rate drops significantly with resolution, and the GPU's performance, as measured by its 72nd percentile ranking, is lower than the CPU's 96th percentile ranking.

Q: Does this system achieve a playable frame rate at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: The data shows an average of 43 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. While this is technically playable, it is below the 60 FPS target often desired for a smooth experience.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested combos in Downfall?

A: The combo ranks 1489 out of a total of 2928 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the performance spectrum.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in the dataset?

A: The highest average FPS is 229, which was measured at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this hardware combination depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For gamers with a 1080p display, the system offers exceptional performance across all presets. Even the demanding Ultra preset achieves an average of 96 FPS, which is excellent for a horror game where smoothness is important for immersion. The Medium and High presets at 1080p provide even higher headroom, with averages of 187 FPS and 154 FPS, respectively, making them suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Low preset, at 229 FPS, shows the absolute ceiling of the system but sacrifices visual fidelity.

At 1440p, the system remains very capable. The High preset, with an average of 110 FPS, is the sweet spot for a balance between visual quality and performance, offering a significant improvement over the 69 FPS average of the Ultra preset. The Medium preset at 134 FPS is also an excellent choice, providing a higher frame rate buffer for intense scenes. The Ultra preset at 69 FPS is playable but may exhibit occasional dips that could be noticeable. For 4K gaming, the choices become more constrained. The High preset, averaging 68 FPS, is the recommended choice for a smooth experience, as it stays close to the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset at 83 FPS offers an even better frame rate, though with reduced visual effects. The Ultra preset at 43 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the threshold for smooth, responsive gameplay and may detract from the experience. The Low preset at 4K, at 102 FPS, is an option for those who prioritize frame rate above all else, but it undermines the visual atmosphere of the horror title. Therefore, the data supports using High settings at 1440p for the best overall experience, or High settings at 4K for a playable, high-fidelity result.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

Cores / Threads 24 / 24
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2581 MHz MHz
TDP 230 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 102.0
3840x2160 Medium 83.0
3840x2160 High 68.0
3840x2160 Ultra 43.0
2560x1440 Low 164.0
2560x1440 Medium 134.0
2560x1440 High 110.0
2560x1440 Ultra 69.0
1920x1080 Low 229.0
1920x1080 Medium 187.0
1920x1080 High 154.0
1920x1080 Ultra 96.0

Downfall with iUltra 7 270K Plus + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 270K Plus + RX 6700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.