Downfall

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers exceptional frame rates in Downfall, positioning this combination in the top 2.4% of all tested configurations. The data shows a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, yet still demonstrates the CPU's capability to push extremely high frame rates at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes the hardware's standing, and provides guidance on optimal settings based on the empirical data.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Downfall?*

A: This specific configuration ranks 41st out of 1741 tested combos in the game, placing it in the top 2.4% of all systems measured.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13400F compare to its closest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25236 is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-13620H, showing a delta of just 0.1%. It is also within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D and the AMD EPYC 9474F.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate achieved is 407.4 FPS, which was measured at a resolution of 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset.

Q: What is the lowest average frame rate recorded?

A: The lowest average is 85.6 FPS, observed at a resolution of 3840x2160 with the Ultra settings preset. This remains comfortably within a playable range.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4090 have, and how does it affect performance?

A: The GPU features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. This substantial memory capacity ensures that VRAM is not a bottleneck at any of the tested settings, even at 4K Ultra.

Q: What are the key architectural specifications of the RTX 4090?

A: Based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, the GPU has a boost clock of 2520 MHz, 16384 shading units, and 128 RT cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications directly explain the performance scaling observed across the measured settings. With a boost clock of 2520 MHz and a massive 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, the card has an immense raw processing capacity. This is complemented by 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores, which, while not explicitly tested in the Downfall data, underpin the GPU's modern feature set.

The memory subsystem is equally formidable. The 24 GB of GDDR6X VRAM, running at 21 Gbps effective on a 384-bit interface, yields a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. This is critical for Downfall, a horror title that likely uses high-resolution textures. The data shows that even at the most demanding setting tested—3840x2160 with Ultra settings—the average frame rate only drops to 85.6 FPS. This suggests the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity are sufficient to feed its processing units without stalling, as there is no catastrophic performance cliff between the Medium and Ultra presets at any resolution.

The GPU's performance relative to other cards is also noteworthy. Its average benchmark score of 66473 places it in the 91st percentile of all GPUs. According to the nearestRivals data, it performs within 0.4% of the NVIDIA Tesla T4 and is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P40. These are professional-grade cards, highlighting that the RTX 4090's gaming performance is at the absolute top tier of the benchmark database.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 achieves a comboRankInGame of 41 out of 1741 tested configurations. This places the system firmly in the elite tier of hardware pairings for Downfall. This high ranking reflects the balance between the two components; the CPU is powerful enough to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, while the GPU provides the enormous throughput necessary for high-resolution gaming.

The CPU’s contribution to this ranking should not be underestimated. Its average benchmark score of 25236 places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. In multi-threaded workloads, it scores 21279 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while its single-core performance is also strong at 3004 in the same test. This strong single-threaded performance is crucial for games like Downfall that may not scale perfectly across all 10 cores and 16 threads. The data indicates that the CPU is not a limiting factor at 1440p and 4K, as frame rates are consistently high. Even at 1080p, where CPU load is highest, the system still achieves over 295 FPS on High settings, demonstrating that the i5-13400F can keep pace with the RTX 4090 in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system scales with resolution and graphical fidelity.

At 1920x1080, the system is heavily CPU-bound, with frame rates reaching extraordinarily high levels. The Low preset yields an average of 407.4 FPS. Moving up to Medium results in 361.5 FPS, and High still produces a very high 295.2 FPS. The most demanding Ultra preset at 1080p drops to 185.3 FPS, which is still far beyond the refresh rate of most monitors.

At 2560x1440, the load shifts more toward the GPU, but performance remains exceptional. The Low preset averages 316.3 FPS, which is a significant drop from the 1080p figure, indicating a slight GPU bottleneck. Medium settings yield 257.9 FPS, and High produces 214.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p is the most demanding in this category, with an average of 136.2 FPS, which is still ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4090's raw power is fully utilized, and the system becomes firmly GPU-bound. The Low preset still manages an impressive 195.5 FPS. Medium averages 160.9 FPS, and High produces 129.5 FPS. The Ultra preset, which represents the maximum visual fidelity in the test, yields an average of 85.6 FPS. This is the only setting where the frame rate dips below the 100 FPS mark, but it remains perfectly playable and smooth on a high-refresh-rate 4K display.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal settings depend entirely on the user's display and preference for visual fidelity versus raw frame rate.

For users with a 1920x1080 display, the High preset is the clear recommendation. It delivers a staggering 295.2 FPS average, which is more than sufficient for any competitive or fast-paced gameplay. The jump to Ultra reduces the average to 185.3 FPS, a significant drop for marginal visual gains. Conversely, the Medium preset at 361.5 FPS offers no practical advantage on a standard 1080p monitor, making High the best balance of quality and performance.

For 2560x1440 users, the High preset again provides the most balanced experience, with an average of 214.6 FPS. This frame rate is ideal for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. The Ultra preset, at 136.2 FPS, is still a very strong option for those who prioritize image quality above all else and have a 144Hz or similar display. The Medium preset is less necessary, as the system has headroom to run High without issue.

At 3840x2160, the choice is more nuanced. The High preset offers an excellent 129.5 FPS average, making it the best choice for 4K gaming with high refresh rates. Users with a standard 60Hz 4K display could comfortably use the Ultra preset, which produces 85.6 FPS, to get the best possible visual experience. The Medium preset at 160.9 FPS is an option for those who want very high frame rates at 4K, but the drop from High to Medium is less impactful visually than the drop from Ultra to High. Overall, the data suggests High at 4K is the sweet spot for this powerful combination.