Downfall
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 147 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 53 | 86 | 101 | 123 |
| 1440p QHD | 83 | 135 | 165 | 198 |
| 1080p Full HD | 120 | 188 | 228 | 281 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, In-Depth Analysis
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT sits at rank 636 out of 1,741 tested combos in Downfall. This places the pairing in the upper-middle tier of all configurations evaluated, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the tested hardware combinations while remaining far from the top echelon. The ranking reflects a balanced partnership where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other at most settings, though the data reveals some interesting asymmetries as resolution and quality presets shift.
Examining the individual components, the CPU holds an 84th percentile ranking against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 27,827. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, scores 27,829 — a 0% delta that effectively puts these two chips at parity. The Core i5-12600K trails by just 0.1%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is 0.2% behind, while the Intel Core i7-13700H leads by 0.4%. This clustering indicates the i5-12600KF sits in a densely packed performance band where tiny margins separate chips from different generations and market segments.
The GPU side tells a similar story of tight competition. The Radeon RX 7800 XT holds a 76th percentile ranking against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32,619. Its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro S9300 X2, scores 32,540 (0.2% behind), while the NVIDIA P104-100 is 0.4% ahead at 32,747. The NVIDIA T600 Mobile leads by 0.7% with 32,849, and the AMD FirePro S10000 trails by 0.7% at 32,388. These small deltas suggest that in synthetic workloads, the RX 7800 XT is competitive with a wide range of accelerators, but Downfall's actual gaming performance will depend heavily on how the engine utilizes the hardware.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides clear guidance on which preset delivers the optimal experience. At 1920x1080, the High preset produces an average of 187.9 FPS, while Medium reaches 227.5 FPS and Low hits 281 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 120.1 FPS. For most displays, the High preset at 1080p offers a strong balance, delivering frame rates well above the typical 144 Hz refresh rate while maintaining visual fidelity. The jump from High to Medium adds roughly 40 FPS — a 21% improvement — but this comes at the cost of reduced graphical quality in a horror title where atmosphere and lighting are critical.
At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 135.4 FPS, which remains excellent for competitive play and high-refresh monitors. Medium reaches 165.3 FPS, and Low pushes to 198.4 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 82.5 FPS, which is still playable but represents a significant 39% drop from High. Given that High at 1440p delivers more than double the frame rate of the minimum acceptable threshold for smooth gameplay, it stands as the recommended preset for this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes considerably. High averages 86.2 FPS, Medium reaches 100.9 FPS, and Low hits 122.6 FPS. Ultra drops sharply to 52.6 FPS, which approaches the boundary where motion smoothness degrades noticeably. For 4K displays, the Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot — it delivers 100.9 FPS while retaining more graphical features than Low, and it maintains a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS baseline. The data indicates that Ultra is only viable at 1080p (120.1 FPS) or for users who prioritize visual quality over frame rate at higher resolutions.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals where the bottleneck shifts between CPU and GPU. At High settings, the progression from 1920x1080 (187.9 FPS) to 2560x1440 (135.4 FPS) represents a 28% drop, while moving from 1440p to 4K (86.2 FPS) costs another 36%. This steepening decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions — the RX 7800 XT's rendering workload grows faster than the CPU's ability to feed it becomes a limiting factor.
At Low settings, the scaling pattern is notably different. The 1080p result of 281 FPS drops to 198.4 FPS at 1440p (a 29% reduction) and then to 122.6 FPS at 4K (a 38% reduction from 1440p). The absolute frame rates remain high throughout, suggesting that even at 4K Low, the combination has headroom. However, the percentage drops are consistent with the High preset, indicating the GPU remains the primary constraint even when graphical load is minimized.
The Medium preset shows similar behavior: 227.5 FPS at 1080p, 165.3 FPS at 1440p (27% lower), and 100.9 FPS at 4K (39% lower than 1440p). The consistent proportional drops across settings imply that the i5-12600KF is not becoming a limiting factor at any tested resolution. If the CPU were the constraint, we would expect the frame rate differences between resolutions to compress as the GPU workload increases, but the data shows no such convergence.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the full range of presets is usable. Low settings produce 281 FPS, which represents the absolute ceiling for this combination at this resolution. Medium delivers 227.5 FPS, High reaches 187.9 FPS, and Ultra maintains 120.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 160.9 FPS, a 57% reduction that reflects the substantial cost of enabling the highest-quality effects in Downfall.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down proportionally. Low achieves 198.4 FPS, Medium hits 165.3 FPS, High manages 135.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 82.5 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 115.9 FPS, again a 58% reduction — nearly identical to the 1080p scaling. This consistency suggests the game's settings have a multiplicative effect on rendering cost regardless of resolution.
At 3840x2160, the envelope tightens. Low produces 122.6 FPS, Medium reaches 100.9 FPS, High averages 86.2 FPS, and Ultra falls to 52.6 FPS. The Low-to-Ultra gap is 70 FPS, a 57% reduction that mirrors the lower resolutions. Notably, the 4K Ultra result is the only measured configuration that dips below 60 FPS, indicating that this preset combination pushes the RX 7800 XT to its limits. The 4K High result of 86.2 FPS remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, making it a viable option for users with high-refresh 4K displays.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit bus, yielding 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. In a horror title like Downfall, where texture detail and lighting effects dominate visual quality, this memory configuration provides ample headroom. The 16 GB capacity is particularly relevant at 4K Ultra, where the frame rate drops to 52.6 FPS — the data suggests this is a rendering throughput limitation rather than a capacity issue, as the card's 60 RT cores and 96 ROPs must process the full effects stack at that resolution.
The GPU's clock behavior is worth noting. The base clock runs at 1295 MHz, while the boost clock reaches 2430 MHz, with a game clock of 2124 MHz. The boost clock represents an 88% increase over the base clock, indicating significant dynamic scaling under load. The memory clock operates at 2438 MHz, translating to 19.5 Gbps effective, which feeds the 256-bit bus to achieve the 624.1 GB/s figure.
The card's compute capabilities include 3,840 shading units and 240 TMUs, producing a texture rate of 583.2 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s. The FP32 throughput of 37.32 TFLOPS places this GPU in a strong position for modern game engines, though Downfall's 2016 release date means it predates many of the advanced features the RDNA 3.0 architecture supports. The card's 76th percentile ranking against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32,619, confirms it sits comfortably above the median but not at the absolute top of the performance spectrum.
The 5 nm process node and 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die contribute to the card's efficiency characteristics. With a TDP of 263 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W, the power requirements are substantial but not extreme for this performance class. The dual-slot design and 2x 8-pin power connectors are standard for this tier. The measured FPS data indicates the GPU is the dominant performance determinant across all tested resolutions and settings, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom to avoid becoming the primary constraint.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12600KF
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 122.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 100.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 86.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 52.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 198.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 165.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 135.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 82.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 281.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 227.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 187.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 120.1 |
Downfall with ii5-12600KF + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RX 7800 XT + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12600KF + RX 7800 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.