Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
110
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 110 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 63 76 93
1440p QHD 63 101 123 150
1080p Full HD 88 141 172 210

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 93
3840x2160 Medium 76
3840x2160 High 63
3840x2160 Ultra 39
2560x1440 Low 150
2560x1440 Medium 123
2560x1440 High 101
2560x1440 Ultra 63
1920x1080 Low 210
1920x1080 Medium 172
1920x1080 High 141
1920x1080 Ultra 88

Downfall with Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a playable experience in Downfall, but the data shows that your choice of resolution and settings dramatically shifts the bottleneck. This combination handles 1080p and 1440p with high frame rates, while 4K requires careful settings management to stay fluid. The measured results indicate a system that is capable of high refresh rate gaming at lower resolutions but becomes firmly GPU-limited as pixel count rises, making the RX 9060 the primary constraint at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 141 FPS at 1080p to 101 FPS at 1440p, and then further down to 63 FPS at 4K. This represents a 28% performance hit when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and a 55% reduction from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is not linear, indicating that the GPU is becoming progressively more saturated with each pixel increase.

Looking at Low settings, the pattern is even more pronounced. The system achieves 210 FPS at 1080p, 150 FPS at 1440p, and 93 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 29%, but the drop from 1440p to 4K is 38%. This steeper decline at higher resolutions strongly suggests that the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the limiting factor, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions. The i3-12100F’s 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient to push well beyond 200 FPS at 1080p Low, but the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit memory bus begin to show their constraints as the pixel workload increases.

The Medium preset tells a similar story. At 1080p, the average is 172 FPS, dropping to 123 FPS at 1440p and 76 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 28% and 38% respectively, mirroring the Low settings trajectory. This consistency across presets confirms that resolution scaling is the dominant factor in performance variance, not the specific graphical details being rendered.

The Ultra preset is where the system struggles most at 4K. The average FPS falls to 39, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. At 1440p Ultra, the system returns to 63 FPS, and at 1080p Ultra, it reaches 88 FPS. The jump from 1440p to 4K at Ultra represents a 38% performance loss, which is significant but consistent with the other presets. This suggests that the RX 9060 is the primary bottleneck at 4K across all settings, while at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU can still keep up with the GPU’s output.

The data indicates that for a 60 FPS target, the system is viable at 4K with Medium or High settings, but not with Ultra. For 1440p, all presets except Ultra exceed 100 FPS, making this the sweet spot for high refresh rate monitors. At 1080p, the system is clearly CPU-bound at Low and Medium settings, where frame rates exceed 170 FPS, but the GPU still manages to deliver 141 FPS at High and 88 FPS at Ultra.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, which are the core components responsible for rendering the game’s horror visuals. The boost clock of 2990 MHz is notably high, and the game clock of 2400 MHz indicates sustained performance under load. These clocks are supported by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory running at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective and a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor in Downfall’s performance at higher resolutions. The measured FPS drops at 4K suggest that the GPU is not only compute-bound but may also be approaching memory capacity limits. The 128-bit memory bus, while paired with fast GDDR6, provides a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the data shows strong performance, but the 4K results indicate that texture streaming and memory allocation become more demanding.

The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 21.43 TFLOPS, which provides the raw compute power for the game’s lighting and shadow effects. The pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s are the theoretical limits that the card can process. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low, the system hits 210 FPS, which is likely close to the CPU’s maximum frame output. At 4K Ultra, the 39 FPS average is well below the GPU’s theoretical capabilities, indicating that the memory subsystem or driver overhead is limiting performance.

The RX 9060’s competitor comparison shows it sits close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, with a delta of -0.7% in average benchmark score. This places it in a mid-range tier that is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The GPU’s percentile ranking of 59 among all GPUs reflects this positioning. The 132 W TDP is modest, and the suggested PSU of 300 W is reasonable for a system with the i3-12100F, which has a TDP of 58 W. This makes the combo power-efficient, but the data shows that the GPU still struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with the most demanding settings.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Downfall at 4K 60 FPS?*

A: Yes, but only with specific settings. The measured data shows 63 FPS at 4K High and 76 FPS at 4K Medium. However, the 4K Ultra preset drops to 39 FPS, so you must avoid Ultra settings to achieve a stable 60 FPS experience.

Q: What is the best resolution for high refresh rate gaming with this setup?

A: The 1440p resolution is the sweet spot. At Low settings, the system achieves 150 FPS, and at High settings, it reaches 101 FPS. This provides ample headroom for a 144Hz monitor, while 1080p can exceed 210 FPS at Low settings.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 1080p?

A: At 1080p Low and Medium, the system reaches 210 FPS and 172 FPS respectively, which suggests the Intel Core i3-12100F is the limiting factor. The GPU is capable of higher output, but the CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads cap the frame rate. At 1080p Ultra, the GPU becomes more involved, with the average dropping to 88 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to other GPUs in its class?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7700. This places it in the same performance tier, making it a suitable option for 1440p gaming.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core 3 N355 (13492) and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-9500 (13452). It outperforms the Intel Core i7-1250U by 1.1%, showing it is a competitive budget processor.

Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM limit performance at 4K?

A: The data suggests it may. The 4K Ultra preset yields only 39 FPS, while 4K High yields 63 FPS. The significant gap between these presets, along with the 38% drop from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra, indicates that memory bandwidth and capacity are likely constraints at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i3-12100F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination ranks 1667 out of 2928 tested combos for Downfall. This places it in the 57th percentile, meaning it outperforms a majority of systems tested but falls short of high-end configurations. The ranking reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU, where the i3-12100F’s 68th percentile performance among all CPUs is complemented by the RX 9060’s 59th percentile among all GPUs.

The combo’s ranking is influenced by the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance, which is evident in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1674 and Geekbench single-core score of 1932. This helps maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions where the GPU is not fully saturated. However, the GPU’s mid-range positioning limits the combo’s ability to compete with systems using higher-tier graphics cards at 4K.

Compared to other combos, this setup is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the measured FPS data shows it can consistently exceed 100 FPS at High settings. The 4K performance is adequate for Medium and High presets, but the Ultra preset’s 39 FPS average clearly shows the limits of this pairing. The combo rank of 1667 indicates that while this system is not top-tier, it provides a solid foundation for most gaming scenarios in Downfall.

The nearest rival CPUs, such as the Intel Core 3 N355 and Intel Core i5-9500, have nearly identical average benchmark scores, but the i3-12100F’s higher boost clock of 4.30 GHz gives it an edge in gaming workloads. The RX 9060’s nearest rival, the RTX 3060 Ti, is only 0.7% faster in benchmarks, meaning the combo’s performance is representative of this GPU tier.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on your target resolution and frame rate. For 1440p, the High preset offers the best balance, delivering 101 FPS average. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides good visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 1440p achieves 123 FPS, which is preferable for competitive play or high refresh rate monitors, but the visual quality is lower.

At 4K, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers 76 FPS with a minimum of 65 FPS. This ensures smooth gameplay without dipping below 60 FPS. The High preset at 4K also works, with an average of 63 FPS, but the frame pacing may be less consistent. The Ultra preset is not recommended at 4K, as the 39 FPS average is too low for a satisfying experience.

For 1080p, the system is capable of high frame rates across all presets. The High preset at 141 FPS is a solid choice for most users, offering good visuals and smooth performance. The Ultra preset at 88 FPS is also viable if you prioritize image quality, but the drop from High to Ultra is significant. The Low preset at 210 FPS is only useful for extreme competitive settings where frame rate is paramount.

The data shows that the Medium preset provides the most consistent frame times, as it is the only preset with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 146 FPS and the maximum is 198 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 104 FPS and the maximum is 141 FPS. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 65 FPS and the maximum is 88 FPS. This consistency makes Medium the safest choice for a stable experience across all resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. The Low preset achieves an average of 210 FPS, which is the maximum recorded for this combo. The Medium preset averages 172 FPS, with a minimum of 146 FPS and a maximum of 198 FPS. The High preset averages 141 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 88 FPS. The data shows a 20% drop from Low to Medium and a 38% drop from Medium to High, indicating that the GPU is becoming more involved as settings increase.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a noticeable reduction. The Low preset averages 150 FPS, which is 29% lower than at 1080p. The Medium preset averages 123 FPS, with a minimum of 104 FPS and a maximum of 141 FPS. The High preset averages 101 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 63 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across all presets, confirming that resolution is the primary performance driver.

At 3840x2160, the system’s performance is the most constrained. The Low preset averages 93 FPS, which is 38% lower than at 1440p. The Medium preset averages 76 FPS, with a minimum of 65 FPS and a maximum of 88 FPS. The High preset averages 63 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 39 FPS. The Ultra preset’s 39 FPS is the lowest recorded value, and it is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.

The overall trend across all resolutions and settings shows that the Intel Core i3-12100F can maintain high frame rates at 1080p, but the AMD Radeon RX 9060 becomes the limiting factor at 1440p and especially 4K. The data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1440p gaming with High settings, where it delivers 101 FPS, or 4K gaming with Medium settings, where it delivers 76 FPS. The i3-12100F’s 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for Downfall, as the game does not appear to be heavily multithreaded based on the frame rate scaling. The RX 9060’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are adequate for most settings, but the Ultra preset at 4K exposes their limitations.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i3-12100F

Cores / Threads 4 / 8
Base Clock 3300 MHz
Boost Clock 4300 MHz
TDP 58W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2990 MHz MHz
TDP 132 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 93.0
3840x2160 Medium 76.0
3840x2160 High 63.0
3840x2160 Ultra 39.0
2560x1440 Low 150.0
2560x1440 Medium 123.0
2560x1440 High 101.0
2560x1440 Ultra 63.0
1920x1080 Low 210.0
1920x1080 Medium 172.0
1920x1080 High 141.0
1920x1080 Ultra 88.0

Downfall with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RX 9060 + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii3-12100F + RX 9060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.