Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
138
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 138 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 49 78 96 117
1440p QHD 79 126 154 188
1080p Full HD 110 176 215 263

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 96
3840x2160 High 78
3840x2160 Ultra 49
2560x1440 Low 188
2560x1440 Medium 154
2560x1440 High 126
2560x1440 Ultra 79
1920x1080 Low 263
1920x1080 Medium 215
1920x1080 High 176
1920x1080 Ultra 110

Downfall with AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

# CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X brings substantial processing resources to this horror title. With 16 cores and 32 threads running on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer), this desktop processor operates between a 3.40 GHz base clock and a 4.90 GHz boost clock. The 64 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for feeding data to the GPU. The CPU's benchmark profile shows strong multi-threaded performance: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 15233, with single-thread scores of 1614 and 2083 respectively.

In Downfall, the CPU's role becomes apparent when examining frame rates across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 263 FPS, which suggests the processor is capable of feeding frames at very high rates. The 3DMark single-thread score of 944 and the 16-thread score of 10810 indicate balanced single- and multi-threaded capability. The CPU's percentile ranking of 91 versus all CPUs places it in the top tier, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (deltaPct -0.2), AMD EPYC 8124P (deltaPct -0.3), and Intel Core i9-13900F (deltaPct 0.4). These rivals show the 5950X sits within a tight performance cluster, with deltas under 1% in either direction.

The 4.90 GHz boost clock is particularly relevant for a game like Downfall, which relies on consistent frame pacing in horror scenarios. The PassMark single-thread score of 3470 and the 3DMark 2-thread score of 1856 suggest that even lightly threaded workloads receive adequate attention. Interestingly, the CPU's 105 W TDP and 7 nm process node from TSMC (with 8,300 million transistors across a 2x 74 mm² die) indicate that power efficiency is not sacrificed for this level of performance. The data implies that at 1080p, the CPU is rarely the limiting factor, given the high frame rates achieved even at High settings (176 FPS).

# GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT employs the Navi 32 chip on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors across a 346 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a specification that becomes increasingly important as resolution increases.

In Downfall, the GPU's influence is most visible in the scaling from 1080p to 4K. At 4K Ultra, the combo drops to 49 FPS, while at 1080p Ultra it reaches 110 FPS — a 44% reduction in frame rate from the lowest to the highest resolution at identical settings. This pattern suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, particularly at Ultra settings where the render load intensifies. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 22547 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 place it in the 67th percentile versus all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (deltaPct 0.5), RTX 4060 Mobile (deltaPct -0.8), and RTX 2080 (deltaPct -1.5).

The 54 ray tracing cores and 96 ROPs suggest the GPU handles both rasterization and ray-traced effects, though Downfall's horror aesthetic may not heavily utilize RT. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for the measured settings, as evidenced by the frame rates at 4K High (78 FPS) versus 4K Medium (96 FPS). The GPU's 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 549.5 GTexel/s texture rate indicate robust geometry and shading throughput. However, the significant frame rate drop at 4K Ultra (49 FPS) versus 4K High (78 FPS) — a 37% decline — points to the GPU being pushed to its limits with the highest preset at 4K.

# Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

Examining the measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions. At Low settings, performance moves from 263 FPS at 1080p to 188 FPS at 1440p to 117 FPS at 4K. This represents a 55.5% drop from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the progression is 176 FPS (1080p) → 126 FPS (1440p) → 78 FPS (4K), a 55.7% reduction. Medium settings show 215 FPS → 154 FPS → 96 FPS, a 55.3% drop. Ultra settings demonstrate the steepest decline: 110 FPS → 79 FPS → 49 FPS, a 55.5% reduction from 1080p to 4K.

The consistency of these percentage drops across all settings — hovering around 55-56% — strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component as resolution increases. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect the scaling to flatten at higher resolutions (since the CPU workload remains constant), but instead the frame rate drops proportionally with pixel count. The 4K pixel count is exactly four times that of 1080p, yet the frame rate drops to roughly 44-45% of the 1080p value, which aligns with GPU-bound behavior.

At 1080p Low, the 263 FPS figure suggests the CPU can push well beyond typical display refresh rates, while at 4K Ultra, the 49 FPS result shows the GPU struggling with the combined resolution and settings load. Intermediate resolutions (1440p) offer a balanced middle ground, with High settings achieving 126 FPS — a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K (96 FPS) with a minimum of 81 FPS provides the only 4K option that consistently exceeds 60 FPS, highlighting the GPU's VRAM and bandwidth constraints at higher resolutions. The 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth appear sufficient for Medium and High at 4K, but Ultra's demands exceed comfortable margins.

# FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Downfall?

A: The data shows 1440p High delivers 126 FPS average, which is well above 60 FPS and close to 120 FPS. At 4K, only Medium (96 FPS average, 81 minimum) maintains a stable frame rate above 60 FPS, while 4K High drops to 78 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has an average benchmark score of 51947, placing it within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-14700 (52301) and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900F (51730). The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52073) and AMD EPYC 8124P (52121) are essentially tied with the 5950X.

Q: Is the GPU competitive with other cards in its class?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22547 on PassMark G3D, with the nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, deltaPct -1.5) and RTX 4060 Mobile (22729, deltaPct -0.8). It is 0.5% ahead of the RTX 5060 Mobile (22435) and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (22170).

Q: What settings provide the best 4K experience?

A: Medium settings at 4K achieve 96 FPS average with a minimum of 81 FPS and maximum of 110 FPS, making it the only 4K preset that maintains a minimum above 60 FPS. High settings at 4K drop to 78 FPS average, while Ultra falls to 49 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance affect this game?

A: The 5950X's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017 and PassMark multithread score of 45424 suggest ample thread utilization capacity. Downfall's frame rates at 1080p (176-263 FPS depending on settings) indicate the CPU can sustain high frame generation, though the game likely doesn't fully exploit all 32 threads.

Q: What is the frame rate consistency at 1080p Medium?

A: At 1080p Medium, the combo delivers 215 FPS average with a minimum of 183 FPS and maximum of 247 FPS, showing a tight frame time distribution. This consistency suggests stable performance without significant stuttering.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

1080p (1920x1080):

  • Low: 263 FPS average
  • Medium: 215 FPS average, 183 minimum, 247 maximum
  • High: 176 FPS average
  • Ultra: 110 FPS average

1440p (2560x1440):

  • Low: 188 FPS average
  • Medium: 154 FPS average, 131 minimum, 177 maximum
  • High: 126 FPS average
  • Ultra: 79 FPS average

4K (3840x2160):

  • Low: 117 FPS average
  • Medium: 96 FPS average, 81 minimum, 110 maximum
  • High: 78 FPS average
  • Ultra: 49 FPS average

# Settings Recommendations

The measured data points to Medium as the optimal preset for this combo, particularly at 4K and 1440p. At 4K Medium, the 96 FPS average with an 81 FPS minimum provides a stable experience above 60 FPS, whereas High dips to 78 FPS average (with no minimum recorded, though the margin above 60 FPS is thinner). At 1440p Medium, the 154 FPS average (131 minimum) offers headroom for high-refresh-rate displays, while High at 126 FPS is also viable. At 1080p, Medium's 215 FPS average (183 minimum) is excellent, though Low's 263 FPS might appeal to competitive players.

Ultra settings are only recommended at 1080p, where 110 FPS average remains playable. At 1440p Ultra (79 FPS) and 4K Ultra (49 FPS), the frame rates drop below comfortable thresholds for smooth gameplay. The data suggests that Medium settings represent the sweet spot for visual fidelity and performance balance across all three resolutions. The minimum FPS figures for Medium — 183 at 1080p, 131 at 1440p, and 81 at 4K — all indicate that this preset avoids the severe frame drops that might occur at higher settings. High settings are a reasonable alternative at 1080p (176 FPS) and 1440p (126 FPS), but at 4K the 78 FPS average leaves less margin for demanding scenes.

# How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT combination ranks 1392 out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the 62.5th percentile of all configurations. This ranking reflects the balanced nature of the pairing — the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (91st percentile versus all CPUs) complements the GPU's mid-range positioning (67th percentile versus all GPUs). The combo's rank suggests that while it outperforms more than half of tested systems, there are 1391 configurations that achieve higher frame rates in this specific title.

The disparity between the CPU's high percentile ranking and the combo's overall ranking indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in Downfall. The CPU could likely support a more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck, as evidenced by the 1080p Low result of 263 FPS. The GPU's nearest rivals — the RTX 2080 with a deltaPct of -1.5 and the RTX 4060 Mobile with -0.8 — suggest that the RX 7700 XT sits in a competitive but not leading position. Systems ranked above this combo likely pair higher-tier GPUs with similar or better CPUs, while the 5950X's processing power ensures that this combo remains viable even in CPU-intensive scenarios.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 4900 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2544 MHz MHz
TDP 245 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 117.0
3840x2160 Medium 96.0
3840x2160 High 78.0
3840x2160 Ultra 49.0
2560x1440 Low 188.0
2560x1440 Medium 154.0
2560x1440 High 126.0
2560x1440 Ultra 79.0
1920x1080 Low 263.0
1920x1080 Medium 215.0
1920x1080 High 176.0
1920x1080 Ultra 110.0

Downfall with Ryzen 9 5950X + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 5950X + RX 7700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.