Downfall
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 148 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 53 | 84 | 103 | 125 |
| 1440p QHD | 85 | 135 | 165 | 202 |
| 1080p Full HD | 118 | 189 | 231 | 282 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Downfall, a 2016 horror title, presents an interesting performance profile for the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combination. The data shows this pairing delivers a broad range of frame rates across resolutions and settings, with the combo ranking 916th out of 2928 tested configurations. The benchmark results indicate a system capable of high refresh rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K Ultra remains a demanding target, all underpinned by a 6-core processor with 12 threads and a 16 GB graphics card.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to use with this CPU and GPU combo for high refresh rate gaming?
A: Based on the measured FPS data, 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 provide the most headroom. At 1080p, the average frame rate exceeds 118 FPS on every setting, and at 1440p, it remains above 85 FPS on all tested presets. 4K is playable but more demanding, with averages ranging from 53 FPS on Ultra to 125 FPS on Low.
Q: How much of a performance difference is there between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?
A: The gap is substantial. At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 202 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 85 FPS. This represents a 117 FPS difference, indicating that the Ultra preset is significantly more demanding on the GPU, while Low allows for much higher frame rates.
Q: Does the 16 GB of VRAM on the RX 7800 XT provide any advantage in this game?
A: The data does not directly measure VRAM usage, but the 16 GB capacity is a key specification. Given that the game can run at 4K with an average of 84 FPS on High settings, the available memory is sufficient for high-resolution textures without apparent performance bottlenecks at the tested settings.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500X3D compare to its closest rivals in general benchmark scores?
A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44573. This places it nearly even with the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, which scores 44466 (0.2% slower), and the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44342 (0.5% slower). It is also 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 0.7% behind the Intel Core i5-14600.
Q: What is the lowest average frame rate recorded for this combo, and at what settings?
A: The lowest average frame rate is 53 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra preset. This is the only measured configuration that dips below the 60 FPS threshold, making 4K Ultra the most challenging scenario for this hardware.
Q: Is the RX 7800 XT's benchmark performance closely matched by any other GPUs?
A: According to the data, the RX 7800 XT's average benchmark score is 11627. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, scores 11680, which is 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500M is 0.9% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT is 1.8% higher in score.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is central to this system's gaming performance in Downfall. This graphics card is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The core operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz, a game clock of 2124 MHz, and a boost clock of 2430 MHz. These specifications are reflected in the measured frame rates, which scale predictably with resolution and settings.
The GPU's role is most evident when examining the performance scaling across different presets. At 1920x1080, the card delivers an average of 189 FPS on High, which jumps to 282 FPS on Low. This indicates that at lower resolutions, the GPU has ample headroom and is not the primary bottleneck. As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the averages drop to 135 FPS on High and 202 FPS on Low, showing a clear performance cost. At 3840x2160, the demand on the GPU becomes much heavier, with the High preset averaging 84 FPS and the Ultra preset falling to 53 FPS.
The VRAM capacity of 16 GB is a significant asset for a modern title, especially when considering the high resolutions tested. The data shows the card can handle 4K with playable frame rates on lower settings, and the memory size helps ensure that texture loading does not create stutter or frame drops, as evidenced by the consistent performance in the measured rows. The 263 W TDP and dual-slot design are notable characteristics, but the focus of the data is on the output, which shows a capable card for high-refresh 1440p gaming and entry-level 4K.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of tested hardware combinations for Downfall, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT holds a rank of 916 out of a total of 2928 combos. This places the system in the upper third of all tested configurations, indicating a solidly performing pairing. The rank is a composite measure, reflecting how this specific CPU and GPU work together in this particular game, rather than a general-purpose performance score.
The position in the 916th spot suggests that while this is a strong setup, there are many other combinations that deliver higher frame rates in Downfall. The data implies that the GPU is the more influential component for this game, as the frame rates vary significantly with resolution and settings, while the CPU's role remains more constant. The rank should be interpreted as a measure of overall capability, with the system being well-suited for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, but less dominant at 4K Ultra, where the 53 FPS average is a limiting factor. The percentile of the GPU versus all GPUs is 51, and the CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 89, which helps contextualize the rank. The CPU is a high-performing part, while the GPU is more mid-range in the broader market, and their combination produces a balanced system that is competitive but not at the very top of the performance charts.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. The Low preset yields an average of 282 FPS, the Medium preset averages 231 FPS with a minimum of 196 and a maximum of 266 FPS, and the High preset averages 189 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 118 FPS, making 1080p gaming a smooth experience on any setting.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show the expected performance cost. The Low preset averages 202 FPS, which is a significant 80 FPS drop from the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset averages 165 FPS, with a minimum of 140 and a maximum of 190 FPS. High settings at this resolution produce an average of 135 FPS, still well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset, however, sees a more substantial decline to an average of 85 FPS, indicating that this setting is much more demanding on the GPU at 1440p.
At 3840x2160, the performance profile changes considerably. The Low preset is the only configuration that provides a very high frame rate, averaging 125 FPS. The Medium preset averages 103 FPS, with a minimum of 87 and a maximum of 118 FPS, which is still a playable experience. High settings at 4K produce an average of 84 FPS, which is suitable for most players. The Ultra preset, however, drops to an average of 53 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS mark and indicating that this is the most challenging scenario for the hardware. The data shows a clear pattern: as resolution increases, the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens, emphasizing the GPU's load at higher pixel counts.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's target resolution and frame rate preference. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is entirely viable, with an average of 118 FPS. This provides the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. For players with high refresh rate monitors, the High preset at 189 FPS or Medium at 231 FPS would be excellent choices to maximize frame rates while maintaining good image quality.
At 2560x1440, the High preset offers the best balance, delivering an average of 135 FPS. This is high enough for smooth gameplay and provides better visual fidelity than Medium. The Ultra preset, while playable at 85 FPS, requires a significant performance trade-off for the increased visual detail. For those who prefer smoother motion over maximum quality, the Medium preset at 165 FPS is a better choice.
For 3840x2160, the High preset is the highest quality setting that maintains a comfortable frame rate, averaging 84 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 4K gaming, as it provides a good balance between visual detail and performance. The Medium preset, with an average of 103 FPS, is a better option for those who want a higher frame rate headroom. The Ultra preset, at 53 FPS, is not recommended for a consistently smooth experience, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset at 125 FPS is the only way to achieve high refresh rates at 4K, but it comes with a significant reduction in visual quality.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a codename of Raphael. It operates with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. A notable feature is its 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a substantial amount and can be beneficial for gaming performance. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and has a TDP of 65 W, indicating an efficient design.
In the context of Downfall, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with data, and its performance is adequate for the frame rates observed. The high single-thread performance, as indicated by a Passmark single-thread score of 3494, helps ensure that the game's logic and rendering calls are processed quickly. The multithread score of 25047 also shows the processor can handle background tasks without impacting gaming performance. The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 89, placing it in the top 11% of all processors.
The benchmark results show that the CPU is not a limiting factor in this pairing. At 1080p, where the GPU is less stressed, the CPU is still able to support average frame rates above 280 FPS on Low settings. The 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for this 2016 title, which likely does not utilize more than a few cores. The large L3 cache may help with data access times, but its specific impact on Downfall is not directly measured. The data indicates that the Ryzen 5 7500X3D provides a solid foundation for the RX 7800 XT, allowing the GPU's performance to be the primary determinant of frame rates across different resolutions and settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 125.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 103.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 84.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 53.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 202.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 165.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 135.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 85.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 282.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 231.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 189.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 118.0 |
Downfall with Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RX 7800 XT + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500X3D + RX 7800 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.