Downfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT pairing delivers a playable but demanding experience in Downfall, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and presets. The data shows this combo ranks in the 72nd percentile of tested systems, indicating a solid mid-range pairing that excels at 1080p and remains viable at 1440p, though 4K requires careful settings management.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) using a 5 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. This CPU sits on the AMD Socket AM5 platform with dual-channel DDR5 memory support and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Its cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a 32 MB shared L3 cache.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 7500F demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability, scoring 22,799 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,218 in single-core. Its 3DMark results show a scaling pattern from 1,902 (2 threads) to 6,379 (max threads), with the 8-thread score of 5,372 representing 84% of the max-thread performance. This indicates that Downfall, a 2016 horror title, likely does not fully utilize the CPU’s 12 threads, but the strong single-core score of 974 in 3DMark ensures responsive frame pacing.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24,964 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H (average score 24,935, delta 0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25,005, delta -0.2%), Intel Core i7-13620H (24,911, delta 0.2%), and Intel Core 5 210H (24,872, delta 0.4%). These deltas are all within 0.4%, meaning the 7500F is effectively performance-equivalent to those chips in aggregate, with the 8400F being the closest competitor at just 0.2% faster.

For Downfall, the CPU’s role appears secondary to the GPU. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 191 FPS average, which suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions where frame rates are high. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 36 FPS, indicating that GPU limitations dominate at higher resolutions. The 6-core/12-thread configuration with 5.00 GHz boost provides sufficient headroom for this title, which is older and likely not heavily multi-threaded.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture (Navi 23 chip) using a 7 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1968 MHz, a game clock of 2359 MHz, and a boost clock of 2589 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, plus 32 ray tracing cores.

The GPU’s compute capabilities include 10.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 165.7 GPixel/s. In synthetic benchmarks, the RX 6600 XT scores 16,461 in Passmark G3D and 7,520 in GPU compute, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (average score 24,277, delta 0.7%), Intel Arc A350M (24,647, delta -0.8%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti (24,236, delta 0.8%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (24,170, delta 1.1%). The RX 6600 XT’s average benchmark score of 24,442 puts it slightly ahead of the RTX 2080 SUPER by 1.1% and marginally behind the Arc A350M by 0.8%.

In Downfall, the GPU is clearly the primary performance driver. The measured FPS data shows a consistent pattern: at 1080p, the combo ranges from 80 FPS (Ultra) to 191 FPS (Low), while at 1440p it drops to 57–136 FPS, and at 4K it falls to 36–85 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for this 2016 title, as even at 4K Ultra the limitation appears to be raw compute rather than memory capacity, given the 36 FPS result. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 10.60 TFLOPS compute are the key factors determining frame rates, with the boost clock of 2589 MHz providing the peak performance headroom.

The GPU’s 160 W TDP and dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector make it a straightforward installation. Its end-of-life production status means it is a previous-generation part, but its performance in Downfall remains competitive, as evidenced by the measured frames.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Downfall?*

A: The data shows 1080p delivers the highest frame rates, with 191 FPS average at Low settings and 128 FPS at High. At 1440p, the combo still achieves 136 FPS at Low and 91 FPS at High, making it a viable option for higher-resolution monitors.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24,964, while the Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25,005. This represents a delta of -0.2%, meaning the 8400F is only 0.2% faster, which is within measurement noise.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the combo achieves 136 FPS average at Low settings and 57 FPS average at Ultra settings. This represents a drop of 79 FPS, or approximately 58%, when moving from the lowest to the highest preset.

Q: Does the GPU outperform the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?

A: The RX 6600 XT has an average benchmark score of 24,442, while the RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24,170. The delta is 1.1%, meaning the RX 6600 XT is 1.1% faster in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming in this title?

A: The measured data shows the combo achieves 36 FPS average at 4K Ultra and 57 FPS at 4K High. While the 8 GB memory is not exceeded in these results, the low frame rates indicate compute limits rather than VRAM constraints in this specific game.

*Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo in Downfall?*

A: The only min FPS values recorded are at Medium settings: 59 FPS at 3840x2160, 95 FPS at 2560x1440, and 133 FPS at 1920x1080. No min FPS data is available for Low, High, or Ultra presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT combination ranks 2,674 out of 3,716 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all systems tested. This rank indicates a solid mid-tier position, with the combo outperforming roughly 72% of tested configurations while being beaten by the top 28%.

This ranking aligns with the individual component percentiles: the CPU sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The combo rank of 72% is slightly lower than the CPU’s individual percentile but slightly higher than the GPU’s, suggesting the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. The measured FPS data supports this, as the frame rates at 1440p and 4K show GPU-bound behavior.

In practical terms, this rank means the combo is positioned among competent gaming systems, capable of handling Downfall at high settings across most resolutions. The 3,716 total combos include a wide range of hardware, from entry-level to enthusiast, and this pairing sits comfortably in the upper-middle range. The delta between the CPU and its nearest rivals (all within 0.4%) does not meaningfully affect the combo’s overall rank, as the GPU choice dominates performance in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo covers three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) and four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra), providing a comprehensive view of performance scaling.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 191 FPS, Medium yields 156 FPS (with min 133 and max 180), High achieves 128 FPS, and Ultra drops to 80 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a reduction of 111 FPS, or approximately 58%, indicating that the Ultra preset is significantly more demanding. The Medium preset’s range of 133–180 FPS shows consistency, with the min FPS staying above 130.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but drops notably. Low settings average 136 FPS, Medium averages 111 FPS (min 95, max 128), High averages 91 FPS, and Ultra falls to 57 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by roughly 29–35% across presets, with the Ultra setting being the hardest hit, dropping from 80 to 57 FPS. The Medium preset’s min of 95 FPS indicates that even in demanding scenes, the combo maintains playable frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles at higher presets. Low settings average 85 FPS, Medium averages 69 FPS (min 59, max 80), High averages 57 FPS, and Ultra drops to 36 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 36 FPS is below the generally accepted 60 FPS threshold, making it borderline playable. The Medium preset’s min of 59 FPS keeps it just above 60 FPS on average, but the 59 FPS min shows occasional dips below that threshold.

Across all resolutions, the scaling pattern is consistent: Low is always the fastest, followed by Medium, High, and Ultra. The gap between Medium and High is smaller than the gap between High and Ultra, suggesting that the Ultra preset includes disproportionately expensive effects. The Medium preset at 1440p (111 FPS average) offers the best balance of resolution and frame rate, while 1080p Ultra (80 FPS) provides a high-quality experience with headroom above 60 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate.

For 1080p, the Ultra preset at 80 FPS average is the best choice for visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the full visual experience. Players prioritizing maximum frame rates can use Low settings for 191 FPS, but the Medium preset at 156 FPS offers a strong middle ground with a min of 133 FPS, ensuring no drops below 120 FPS.

For 1440p, the Medium preset at 111 FPS average (min 95, max 128) is the recommended choice. It delivers high frame rates with a min that stays above 90 FPS, providing a smooth experience. The High preset at 91 FPS is also viable, but the 20 FPS difference between Medium and High may not justify the visual upgrade. The Ultra preset at 57 FPS is below 60 FPS and should be avoided for consistent performance.

For 4K, only the Low preset at 85 FPS average provides a comfortable experience above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 69 FPS is playable but with a 59 FPS min, meaning occasional dips below 60. The High preset at 57 FPS is borderline, and Ultra at 36 FPS is not recommended for smooth gameplay. Players with 4K displays should use Low or Medium settings, accepting reduced visual quality for playable frame rates.

The data indicates that the Medium preset offers the best overall experience across resolutions, as it is the only preset with recorded min FPS values, showing the combo’s ability to maintain consistent frame delivery. At 1080p and 1440p, Medium provides frame rates well above 100 FPS, while at 4K it stays just above 60 FPS on average. For users who prioritize visual fidelity, the High preset at 1080p (128 FPS) or 1440p (91 FPS) is a strong alternative, but the Medium preset represents the best balance of performance and quality in this title.