Doom

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile delivers a remarkably consistent and powerful experience in Doom, ranking in the 55th percentile of all tested system combinations. The data shows a configuration that handles the game’s demanding Vulkan engine with authority across all resolution and settings tiers, though the performance curve reveals a clear shift from CPU-bound at 1080p to GPU-bound at 4K. This is a versatile mobile setup that can chase high refresh rates at 1440p or maintain smooth 4K gameplay with minor settings adjustments.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combo in Doom?

A: The combination ranks 2033 out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the 55th percentile of all systems tested for this game.

Q: What is the best average FPS achieved at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate is 227 FPS at 1080p with Low settings. The Medium preset achieves 198 FPS, High reaches 167 FPS, and Ultra drops to 137 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores an average of 27507 across all benchmarks. This puts it 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G.

Q: Does the GPU outperform or underperform its closest competitor in synthetic tests?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 27435, which is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT at 0% delta. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 by 0.5% and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 1.5%, but leads the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell by 1.1%.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, at 4K with High settings the average FPS is 59, which is just shy of a locked 60. Lowering to Medium settings brings the average to 69 FPS, ensuring a stable experience above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS recorded is 109, with a maximum of 148 and an average of 128 FPS, indicating very consistent frame pacing.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the primary driver of performance in Doom, particularly at higher resolutions where its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a critical factor. The GPU’s boost clock of 1695 MHz and base clock of 1395 MHz provide the raw throughput needed to handle the game’s fast-paced action, while its 4608 shading units and 144 texture mapping units deliver the pixel and texture rates necessary for detailed environments.

The synthetic benchmark data positions this GPU as a strong performer, with a Passmark G3D score of 19587 and a percentile ranking of 73 against all GPUs. In Doom specifically, the GPU’s capabilities are most evident at 4K, where the difference between Low and Ultra settings can swing performance by nearly 40%. The GPU’s 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate ensure it can handle the game’s modern rendering techniques efficiently.

At 1080p, the GPU is often not the limiting factor, as the frame rates exceed 200 FPS on lower presets. However, the data shows that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute power become the bottleneck as resolution increases. The transition from 1440p to 4K shows a significant performance drop across all settings, indicating that the RTX 4070 Mobile is working near its limits at the highest resolution. The GPU’s 48 ROPs and 36 RT cores also contribute to its ability to maintain playable frame rates even when the game’s visual complexity increases.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2033 out of 3712 tested configurations places it comfortably in the upper half of all systems tested for Doom. This ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component severely bottlenecks the other, though the scaling patterns suggest the GPU becomes the dominant constraint at higher resolutions.

Compared to other potential pairings with this CPU, the RTX 4070 Mobile is a strong match. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27507 is nearly identical to the GPU’s 27435, indicating a well-balanced system where both components contribute meaningfully to gaming performance. This balance is reflected in the measured FPS across all settings, where the system never drops below playable thresholds even at the most demanding configurations.

The 55th percentile ranking means the system outperforms a majority of tested combos, but it is not at the top tier. This is consistent with the GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking against all GPUs, as the CPU’s 79th percentile ranking helps lift the overall combo slightly. The system is clearly capable of delivering high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and smooth 4K experiences, but it does not reach the extreme frame rates seen from top-tier desktop configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates exceptional performance across all settings. The Low preset yields an average of 227 FPS, which reflects the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s efficiency. The Medium preset delivers 198 FPS with a minimum of 168 and maximum of 228, showing excellent consistency. High settings produce 167 FPS, while Ultra still manages a very respectable 137 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors with ease, even on the most demanding presets.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU’s workload increasing. The Low preset achieves 147 FPS, which is still exceptionally high. Medium settings drop to 128 FPS average with a minimum of 109 and maximum of 148, maintaining a smooth experience. High settings produce 108 FPS, and Ultra still holds at 89 FPS. This resolution represents the sweet spot for the system, offering a balance between visual fidelity and high frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. The Low preset delivers 80 FPS, which is playable, but the Medium preset drops to 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 and maximum of 80. High settings average 59 FPS, barely hitting the 60 FPS target, while Ultra falls to 48 FPS. The data shows that for a locked 60 FPS experience at 4K, players will need to use Medium settings or lower, as the High preset sits just at the threshold.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the system’s balance. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 227 at 1080p to 147 at 1440p and then to 80 at 4K. This represents a 35% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a further 46% drop from 1440p to 4K. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is becoming increasingly saturated as resolution increases, with the CPU’s role diminishing.

For Medium settings, the progression is 198 FPS at 1080p, 128 FPS at 1440p, and 69 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 35% and 46% respectively, showing a consistent scaling pattern regardless of settings. This consistency suggests that the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints at higher resolutions, rather than any specific settings-related bottleneck.

The High settings scaling tells a similar story: 167 FPS at 1080p, 108 FPS at 1440p, and 59 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 35%, while from 1440p to 4K it is 45%. At Ultra settings, the system delivers 137 FPS at 1080p, 89 FPS at 1440p, and 48 FPS at 4K, with drops of 35% and 46% respectively. The near-identical scaling percentages across all settings strongly indicate that the GPU is the limiting component at resolutions above 1080p.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to allow the GPU to perform at its maximum potential. However, as resolution increases, the GPU’s workload grows exponentially, and the system’s performance becomes directly tied to the RTX 4070 Mobile’s capabilities. This is a classic sign of a well-matched mobile gaming system where the CPU does not unnecessarily hold back the GPU at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

For players targeting the highest possible frame rates at 1080p, the Low preset at 227 FPS is the clear choice, though the Medium preset at 198 FPS offers a better balance of visual quality and performance. The High preset at 167 FPS is still excellent for competitive play, while Ultra at 137 FPS provides the best visuals without sacrificing smoothness on high-refresh-rate displays.

At 1440p, the Medium preset at 128 FPS is the recommended starting point, as it provides a significant visual upgrade over Low while maintaining frame rates well above 100 FPS. The High preset at 108 FPS is also a strong option for those who prioritize visual fidelity, as it stays comfortably above the 100 FPS mark. The Ultra preset at 89 FPS is viable for those with 90Hz or 120Hz displays, but the drop below 100 FPS may be noticeable to sensitive users.

For 4K gaming, the Medium preset at 69 FPS is the best choice for a smooth experience, as it provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset at 59 FPS is borderline, and players may experience occasional dips below 60 FPS. The Low preset at 80 FPS offers the highest frame rates at 4K, but the visual compromise may be significant. The Ultra preset at 48 FPS is not recommended for 4K, as it falls below the playable threshold for most gamers.

The overall recommendation is to prioritize the Medium preset at all resolutions, as it consistently provides the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 1080p and 1440p, Medium offers frame rates that are indistinguishable from the higher presets in terms of smoothness, while at 4K, it is the only preset that guarantees a locked 60 FPS experience. Players with high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p or 1440p can experiment with High or Ultra settings, as the system has enough headroom to maintain playable frame rates even at the highest visual quality.