Doom

The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination delivers exceptional performance in Doom, placing the system in the top tier of tested configurations. The data shows a pairing that is heavily GPU-bound at lower resolutions, yet still provides a fluid experience at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured results to show exactly where this combo excels and where its limits lie.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its substantial multi-threading capabilities are reflected in synthetic benchmarks, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 19620. While Doom does not heavily tax a processor of this caliber, the CPU's high single-core performance—evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958—ensures that frame pacing is never bottlenecked by the processor.

The 14700F's 33 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory contribute to its ability to feed data to the GPU without stalling. In the context of this game, the CPU's role is to maintain a high minimum frame rate, allowing the Radeon RX 7900 XT to operate at its full potential. The processor's 65W TDP and locked multiplier suggest a focus on efficiency rather than overclocking, but the stock boost clock is more than sufficient for this title. The data shows that at 1080p, where CPU overhead is most pronounced, the combo still delivers up to 338 FPS on Low settings, indicating that the 14700F is not a limiting factor in Doom.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination's overall standing in the database for Doom is strong. It ranks 710 out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the top 19% of all configurations. This rank confirms the synergy between the high-core-count CPU and the powerful GPU. While the CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 91, and the GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 55, the in-game ranking shows that their combined performance in this specific title is greater than the sum of its parts. The average benchmark scores for the components are 53620 for the CPU and 13745 for the GPU, but the measured FPS results demonstrate that this pairing is particularly effective for Doom's engine.

The combo's rank is influenced by the fact that Doom is a well-optimized title that scales effectively with both CPU and GPU resources. The 14700F's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Xeon 6505P, have similar average scores with delta percentages of 0.6% and -0.2%, respectively. However, the in-game rank suggests that the 14700F's specific architecture and cache layout provide an edge in gaming scenarios. Similarly, the RX 7900 XT's nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, show that the 7900 XT is competitively positioned, with a delta of 1.5% versus the 9070 XT. This combination of a top-tier CPU and a high-end GPU results in a system that comfortably handles the demands of Doom.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions, highlighting the shift in system bottleneck from the CPU to the GPU as resolution increases. At 1080p, the frame rates are exceptionally high, ranging from 203 FPS on Ultra to 338 FPS on Low. This indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to saturate its rendering pipeline, but the GPU is still the primary driver of performance. The drop from 338 FPS at 1080p Low to 219 FPS at 1440p Low represents a 35% decrease in frame rate, which is a direct result of the increased pixel count.

Moving from 1440p to 4K (2160p) shows an even more pronounced scaling effect. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 119, which is a 46% drop from the 1440p Low score of 219 FPS. This steep decline is a classic sign of the GPU becoming the definitive bottleneck, as the RX 7900 XT's rendering workload increases exponentially with resolution. The data shows that at 4K, the CPU's role diminishes, and the system's performance is almost entirely dictated by the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth. The 20 GB of GDDR6 memory and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth on the 7900 XT are crucial here, as they allow the GPU to maintain playable frame rates even at the demanding 4K Ultra preset, which averages 71 FPS. The scaling pattern confirms that this combo is balanced for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming, while still being capable of a smooth 4K experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's performance across all settings and resolutions. The following breakdown details the exact numbers for each configuration.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: Average FPS of 338. This is the highest score recorded in the entire dataset, indicating a massive performance headroom at this resolution.
• Medium: Average FPS of 295, with a minimum of 251 and a maximum of 339. The minimum frame rate shows that the experience remains smooth even in demanding scenes.
• High: Average FPS of 249. This represents a significant drop from Medium settings, but still remains well above the 144Hz threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 203. This is a very strong result, showing that the combo can handle maxed-out settings at 1080p with ease.

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: Average FPS of 219. This is a 35% decrease from the 1080p Low score, but the frame rate is still exceptionally high.
• Medium: Average FPS of 191, with a minimum of 162 and a maximum of 219. The minimum FPS here indicates that the system can maintain a stable experience even during intense action sequences.
• High: Average FPS of 161. This is just above the 160Hz refresh rate that many high-end monitors offer, making it a viable setting for competitive play.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 132. This is a comfortable result for 1440p gaming, providing a fluid experience that exceeds the 120Hz standard.

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: Average FPS of 119. This is a solid result for 4K, showing that the GPU can handle lower settings at this resolution while still delivering a smooth experience.
• Medium: Average FPS of 103, with a minimum of 88 and a maximum of 119. The minimum FPS of 88 is still well above the 60FPS playability threshold.
• High: Average FPS of 87. This is a playable frame rate for a 4K display, though it may not be suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 71. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and the result shows that the combo can maintain a near-60FPS experience at maximum settings.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the top average FPS recorded for this combination?

A: The maximum average FPS recorded is 338, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average FPS of 71, which is a smooth and playable experience for a 4K display.

Q: What is the frame rate drop from 1440p High to 4K High?

A: The average FPS drops from 161 at 2560x1440 with High settings to 87 at 3840x2160 with High settings, representing a 46% reduction in performance.

Q: Does the system maintain a stable minimum FPS at 1440p Medium?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 162, with an average of 191 and a maximum of 219, indicating a very stable frame time.

Q: What is the rank of this combo among all tested combinations?

A: The combination ranks 710 out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the top 19% of all systems tested for Doom.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has a boost clock speed of 5.40 GHz, which supports high single-threaded performance.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's display resolution and refresh rate. For gamers with a 1080p 144Hz monitor, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it delivers an average FPS of 203, ensuring the display is fully utilized without any compromises in visual fidelity. If the monitor supports a 240Hz refresh rate, the High preset, which averages 249 FPS, is a better option, providing a near-maximum refresh rate experience.

For 1440p gaming, the High preset is the sweet spot, yielding an average FPS of 161. This is ideal for a 144Hz or 165Hz monitor, as it provides a fluid experience while maintaining high visual quality. The Ultra preset at 1440p, which averages 132 FPS, is also a viable option for those who prioritize image quality over maximum frame rates, as it still exceeds the 120Hz threshold.

At 4K, the Medium preset delivers an average FPS of 103, which is an excellent balance between visual quality and performance for a 60Hz or 120Hz display. The High preset at 87 FPS is also playable, but the Medium preset offers a more comfortable margin above the 60FPS baseline, ensuring a smoother experience. The Low preset at 4K, which averages 119 FPS, is best reserved for competitive play where frame rate is paramount over visual fidelity. Ultimately, the combo is most balanced at 1440p High, where the CPU and GPU scales are perfectly aligned to deliver a high-refresh-rate experience without leaving performance on the table.