Doom

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT pairing delivers a high-refresh-rate experience in Doom, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and settings. The data shows a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s strong single-threaded throughput ensures frame rates remain high even at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the measured results from the FACT PACK, focusing on component roles, resolution scaling, and optimal settings.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

Doom is a fast-paced FPS that can be sensitive to CPU performance, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is less of a bottleneck. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which are strong figures for gaming workloads. The chip features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache, providing ample fast memory for game logic and physics calculations.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 9700F achieves a Passmark single-thread score of 4691 and a multithread score of 36470. Its average benchmark score of 69996 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF is 0.2% lower. This tight grouping shows the 9700F is directly competitive with high-end desktop and mobile parts.

In the context of Doom, the measured FPS data suggests that the CPU is not the primary limiter. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 338 FPS average. This very high frame rate demonstrates that the Ryzen 7 9700F can feed the GPU with enough data to avoid a CPU-bound scenario, even when the graphical load is light. The boost clock of 5.50 GHz is particularly relevant here, as single-threaded performance is critical for game engines that rely on a main thread for rendering commands. The 16 threads also ensure that background tasks and the game’s audio and AI systems do not interfere with frame pacing.

While the CPU’s 65 W TDP suggests efficient operation, the benchmark results indicate it is more than capable of handling the demands of Doom’s engine without becoming a bottleneck. The fact that the 9700F sits so close to rivals like the 7950X (0.7% faster) and the 14700K (0.9% faster) in average score reinforces that this is a high-performance part. For Doom, the practical takeaway is that the CPU will allow the GPU to stretch its legs, especially at lower resolutions where the frame rate ceiling is high.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is the primary driver of visual quality and resolution scaling in this configuration. Based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Navi 31 chip, it has a base clock of 1387 MHz and a boost clock of 2394 MHz. It comes with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This is a significant amount of VRAM, which is more than sufficient for Doom’s textures at any resolution, ensuring no memory-related stutters.

The GPU’s raw compute power is substantial, with 5376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs. The FP32 performance is rated at 51.48 TFLOPS, and the pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s. These specs translate into high fill rates and geometry throughput. However, the synthetic benchmark standing of the RX 7900 XT is curious. Its average benchmark score is 13745, placing it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M (0.5% faster), NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (0.5% faster), and the RX 570X (0.9% faster). This suggests that the average score is dragged down by compute or OpenCL workloads, as the gaming performance in Doom is clearly high-end.

In Doom, the GPU’s role becomes evident when examining the FPS across settings. At 4K Ultra, the system averages 71 FPS, which is demanding for any GPU. The RX 7900 XT’s 20 GB VRAM buffer is not a limiting factor here; instead, the GPU’s shading and ROP throughput are the constraining elements. The boost clock of 2394 MHz helps maintain high frame rates even when the card is under full load. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s is also critical for streaming textures and geometry at 4K, where the data requirements are highest.

The data indicates that the RX 7900 XT is a capable 4K gaming card for Doom, but it excels at lower resolutions. At 1440p High, it hits 161 FPS, and at 1080p High, it reaches 249 FPS. These are excellent results for a modern title, showing the GPU can handle high refresh rate monitors at mainstream resolutions. The 55th percentile overall ranking is misleading for gaming; the measured FPS data is the true indicator of its performance in this specific title.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system scales from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 249 at 1080p to 161 at 1440p, and finally to 87 at 4K. This is a drop of 35% from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 46% drop from 1440p to 4K. This pattern strongly indicates a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions.

When the resolution increases, the GPU must render more pixels, which increases the load on the shading units and ROPs. The CPU’s workload remains relatively constant, as it is still processing the same game logic and draw calls. The fact that the FPS drops significantly with resolution proves that the RX 7900 XT is the limiting component at 1440p and 4K. The Ryzen 7 9700F is capable of sustaining much higher frame rates, as evidenced by the 1080p results.

Looking at the Low settings, the scaling is similar: 338 FPS at 1080p, 219 FPS at 1440p, and 119 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 35% and 46% respectively, matching the High settings pattern. This consistency across settings confirms that the resolution is the dominant factor, and the GPU is the bottleneck. Even with Low settings, the GPU’s pixel throughput is the limiting factor at 4K, as the CPU is not holding it back.

The Medium settings data includes min and max FPS values, which add another layer of insight. At 1080p Medium, the average is 295 FPS, with a min of 251 and a max of 339. At 1440p Medium, the average is 191 FPS, with a min of 162 and a max of 219. At 4K Medium, the average is 103 FPS, with a min of 88 and a max of 119. The relatively narrow gap between min and max FPS at each resolution suggests stable performance without major frame drops, reinforcing that the system is well-balanced but GPU-limited at higher resolutions.

The data shows that to achieve the highest possible frame rates, lowering the resolution is the most effective lever. The CPU can deliver over 300 FPS at 1080p, but the GPU cannot exceed 119 FPS at 4K even on Low. This is the classic signature of a GPU-bound system, which is expected given the high-performance CPU paired with a mid-high-end GPU.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend on the user’s display refresh rate and resolution preference. The data shows a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and frame rate.

For 1080p displays, the Ultra preset delivers 203 FPS average, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate common on many monitors. The High preset increases this to 249 FPS, and Medium to 295 FPS. Given that Doom is a fast-paced shooter, the Medium or High presets are recommended to maximize smoothness and reduce input latency, as frame rates above 200 FPS are more beneficial than the marginal visual gains from Ultra. The Low preset at 338 FPS offers the highest frame rate but at a significant visual cost.

For 1440p displays, the High preset at 161 FPS is an excellent choice for 144 Hz or 165 Hz monitors. The Ultra preset drops to 132 FPS, which is still playable but may not fully saturate a 144 Hz display. The Medium preset at 191 FPS is ideal for those with 165 Hz or 240 Hz monitors, offering a good balance of visual quality and speed. The Low preset at 219 FPS is the best for competitive play, but the visual downgrade is noticeable.

For 4K displays, the situation is more constrained. The High preset averages 87 FPS, which is suitable for a 60 Hz or 120 Hz display, but not for high-refresh-rate gaming. The Medium preset at 103 FPS is a better choice for 120 Hz panels, providing a slightly smoother experience. The Ultra preset at 71 FPS is playable on a 60 Hz screen but will feel less responsive. The Low preset at 119 FPS is the only way to approach 120 Hz at 4K, but the visual quality is significantly reduced.

The best experience per the data is to prioritize frame rate for competitive play. At 1080p and 1440p, Medium or High presets offer the best balance, providing frame rates that exceed most high-refresh-rate monitors. At 4K, Medium is the recommended preset, as it provides a playable frame rate above 100 FPS while maintaining reasonable visual quality.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable at 1080p with this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The highest average FPS at 1080p is 338, achieved with the Low settings preset.

Q: Is the system more CPU-bound or GPU-bound in Doom?

A: The data indicates a GPU-bound system. The FPS drops significantly from 1080p to 4K (e.g., from 249 to 87 FPS on High), while the CPU is capable of sustaining over 300 FPS at 1080p Low.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS values recorded at 1440p Medium?

A: At 1440p Medium, the minimum FPS is 162 and the maximum is 219, with an average of 191 FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF’s score of 70163.

Q: Does the RX 7900 XT have enough VRAM for 4K gaming in Doom?

A: Yes, the RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is more than sufficient for Doom at 4K. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra is 71, indicating the GPU’s compute power, not VRAM, is the limiting factor.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of the GPU compared to all other GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is in the 55th percentile of all GPUs based on its average benchmark score.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following table lists all measured average FPS values. Where available, minimum and maximum FPS are included.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: Average 338 FPS
• Medium: Average 295 FPS, Min 251 FPS, Max 339 FPS
• High: Average 249 FPS
• Ultra: Average 203 FPS

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: Average 219 FPS
• Medium: Average 191 FPS, Min 162 FPS, Max 219 FPS
• High: Average 161 FPS
• Ultra: Average 132 FPS

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: Average 119 FPS
• Medium: Average 103 FPS, Min 88 FPS, Max 119 FPS
• High: Average 87 FPS
• Ultra: Average 71 FPS

The data shows a consistent hierarchy: Lower settings and lower resolutions yield higher frame rates. The system achieves its highest average FPS at 1080p Low (338 FPS) and its lowest at 4K Ultra (71 FPS). The min and max values for Medium settings indicate stable frame delivery across all resolutions, with the largest spread between min and max occurring at 1080p (251 to 339 FPS), suggesting the CPU is capable of pushing frame rates to their peak in less demanding scenes.