Dave The Diver

# Dave The Diver: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — Benchmark Analysis

This combination delivers exceptional performance in Dave The Diver, with the RTX 3070 and Ryzen 7 5700 proving more than capable of driving high refresh rates at every tested resolution. The measured data shows the pair sits at rank 1588 out of 3710 tested combinations in this game, placing it comfortably in the upper half of all systems. The most striking result is that even at 4K Ultra settings, the system maintains 87 FPS average, which is far above the 60 FPS threshold most players consider smooth. This is a system that never struggles with Dave The Diver, regardless of how demanding the settings get.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 compare to its nearest rivals in overall CPU performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 25517, placing it at the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, which scores 25485, meaning the 5700 is only 0.1% faster. Against the Intel Xeon D-2752TER and AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, the 5700 trails by 0.1% in both cases, while it leads the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U by 0.3%.

Q: What is the RTX 3070's performance standing relative to other GPUs?

A: The RTX 3070 achieves an average benchmark score of 17208, placing it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which scores 17083, meaning the RTX 3070 is 0.7% faster. It also leads the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 by 1% and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M by 1.1%, while trailing the NVIDIA Tesla K40c by 1.5%.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with this system?

A: At 1920x1080, the system delivers between 173 FPS and 262 FPS depending on settings. Low settings produce 262 FPS, Medium produces 220 FPS, High produces 196 FPS, and Ultra produces 173 FPS. Even at the most demanding Ultra preset, the frame rate remains well above 144 Hz, making this ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combination?

A: Yes, 4K is very viable. At 3840x2160, the system achieves 132 FPS on Low, 111 FPS on Medium, 99 FPS on High, and 87 FPS on Ultra. The Ultra result of 87 FPS is particularly impressive, as it maintains smooth gameplay while delivering maximum visual quality.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its single-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 shows strong scaling across thread counts. In 3DMark, it scores 901 in single-thread, 3382 in 4-thread, 5585 in 8-thread, and 6628 in 16-thread tests. This represents a 7.3x improvement from single-thread to max-thread performance, indicating excellent multi-core utilization.

Q: What is the system's overall ranking in Dave The Diver specifically?

A: The combination ranks 1588 out of 3710 tested combinations in Dave The Diver, placing it in the 57th percentile of all systems tested for this game. This ranking reflects the strong, consistent performance across all resolution and settings combinations.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 serves as the compute foundation for this system, and its specifications directly support the high frame rates observed in Dave The Diver. Built on the Zen 3 architecture with a 7 nm process from TSMC, this 8-core, 16-thread processor operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The 65W TDP indicates efficient power delivery, while the 16 MB of L3 cache provides ample fast-access storage for game data. This processor's 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25517, demonstrates that it sits well above the median for gaming workloads.

The CPU's memory subsystem is equally important for game performance. Supporting DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration, the 5700 provides 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This bandwidth is sufficient to feed the 8 cores without creating bottlenecks, especially in a game like Dave The Diver that doesn't require extreme memory throughput. The processor's PCIe Gen 3 interface with 20 lanes provides adequate connectivity for the RTX 3070, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface means it can communicate at full bandwidth through backward compatibility.

Benchmark data reveals strong multi-threaded performance that benefits gaming. In Cinebench R23, the 5700 scores 20655 in multi-core and 2916 in single-core, showing a multi-core advantage of approximately 7.1x over single-thread performance. This scaling is typical for an 8-core processor and ensures that even heavily threaded game tasks are handled efficiently. The 3DMark results tell a similar story, with scores of 6628 in 16-thread tests versus 901 in single-thread, confirming that the processor maintains performance across all thread configurations.

In Dave The Diver specifically, the CPU's capabilities are more than sufficient. The game's adventure genre typically involves moderate CPU load, and the 5700's 8 cores and 16 threads provide substantial headroom. The measured FPS results show no signs of CPU limitation, as frame rates scale predictably with resolution changes, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions rather than the CPU. The processor's 78th percentile ranking and consistent benchmark scores suggest it will not be the limiting factor in this gaming scenario.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is the primary driver of visual performance in this system, and its specifications directly correlate with the measured frame rates in Dave The Diver. Built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, this GPU features 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates at 4K resolution. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1725 MHz, delivering 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

The RTX 3070's memory configuration is particularly relevant to Dave The Diver's performance. With 8 GB of VRAM, the GPU has sufficient memory capacity for this game, even at 4K Ultra settings where texture detail and draw distances are maximized. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and scene data transfer do not become bottlenecks. The 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores provide additional processing capabilities, though Dave The Diver's visual style typically doesn't rely heavily on these features.

The GPU's benchmark performance places it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 17208. Its nearest competitor, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, scores 17083, showing the RTX 3070 maintains a 0.7% advantage. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 22214 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 further demonstrate its computational capabilities. These benchmark scores correlate with the measured gaming performance, where the GPU consistently delivers high frame rates across all tested settings.

In Dave The Diver, the GPU's role becomes increasingly important as resolution increases. At 1080p, the GPU still delivers high frame rates but is not fully stressed, as evidenced by the 262 FPS result at Low settings. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary performance determinant, with frame rates scaling down from the 1080p results. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking confirms it is a capable mid-to-high-end card that handles this game's demands without issue, though it does show more variation across settings at 4K compared to lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a system that delivers excellent performance across all resolution and settings combinations. At 1920x1080, the system produces outstanding results starting with 262 FPS on Low settings, 220 FPS on Medium with a range of 187 to 252 FPS, 196 FPS on High, and 173 FPS on Ultra. These numbers indicate that even at the highest settings, the system maintains frame rates well above 144 Hz, making it ideal for competitive play or high-refresh-rate displays.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains impressive but begins to show the expected scaling. Low settings produce 197 FPS, Medium delivers 165 FPS with a range of 140 to 190 FPS, High achieves 147 FPS, and Ultra maintains 130 FPS. The 1440p results show a more pronounced difference between settings, with Ultra being 34% slower than Low, compared to the 34% difference at 1080p. This consistency suggests balanced component utilization at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system continues to deliver high frame rates, though the settings gap widens. Low settings produce 132 FPS, Medium achieves 111 FPS with a range of 94 to 127 FPS, High delivers 99 FPS, and Ultra maintains 87 FPS. The 4K results show a 34% difference between Low and Ultra settings, matching the pattern seen at lower resolutions. Importantly, even the worst-case scenario of 87 FPS at 4K Ultra is well above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring smooth gameplay in all situations.

The Medium settings results provide the most complete picture, as they include both minimum and maximum frame rates. At 1080p Medium, the range of 187 to 252 FPS shows a 26% variation, indicating some scene-dependent performance fluctuations. At 1440p Medium, the range of 140 to 190 FPS shows a 26% variation, similar to 1080p. At 4K Medium, the range of 94 to 127 FPS shows a 26% variation, maintaining consistency across resolutions. This consistency suggests that the system handles scene complexity uniformly regardless of resolution.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K provides clear insight into which component limits performance at each resolution. Starting with High settings, the system delivers 196 FPS at 1080p, 147 FPS at 1440p, and 99 FPS at 4K. This represents a 25% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 33% drop from 1440p to 4K. The total drop from 1080p to 4K is 49%, which is less than the 75% reduction in pixel count, indicating that the system is not purely GPU-limited at lower resolutions.

Low settings show similar scaling patterns: 262 FPS at 1080p, 197 FPS at 1440p, and 132 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 25%, and from 1440p to 4K is 33%, matching the High settings pattern exactly. This consistency across different quality presets suggests that the scaling is resolution-driven rather than settings-driven. At Medium settings, the pattern continues with 220 FPS at 1080p, 165 FPS at 1440p, and 111 FPS at 4K, showing the same 25% and 33% drops.

Ultra settings produce the most pronounced scaling: 173 FPS at 1080p, 130 FPS at 1440p, and 87 FPS at 4K, with identical 25% and 33% drops. The fact that all four settings presets show exactly the same percentage drops at each resolution step strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU, with its 8 cores and strong multi-threaded performance, is capable enough to maintain consistent frame rates at 1080p, but the GPU's workload increases disproportionately with resolution.

The resolution scaling data reveals that this system is GPU-bound at 4K, but not at 1080p. The 49% total drop from 1080p to 4K is less than the pixel count difference of 75%, suggesting that at 1080p, the system is partially CPU-bound or has performance headroom that isn't fully utilized. At 4K, however, the GPU is clearly the primary constraint, as indicated by the larger frame rate drops at higher settings. This analysis suggests that users with 1080p or 1440p monitors are getting the most balanced performance, while 4K users are seeing the true capabilities of the RTX 3070.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's display resolution and refresh rate preferences. For 1080p displays, all settings presets deliver excellent performance, with even Ultra settings maintaining 173 FPS. This means users can select Ultra for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness, as the frame rate remains well above 144 Hz. For those with 240 Hz displays, High settings at 196 FPS would be the better choice, while Medium at 220 FPS offers a good balance for those seeking higher frame rates.

At 1440p, the system continues to perform admirably across all settings. Ultra settings at 130 FPS are perfectly playable and recommended for users prioritizing visual fidelity, while High settings at 147 FPS provide a slight frame rate boost with minimal visual compromise. Medium settings at 165 FPS would be the pick for users with 165 Hz or 170 Hz monitors who want to maximize refresh rate utilization. Low settings at 197 FPS is unnecessary for most users unless they have a 200 Hz or higher display.

For 4K displays, the settings recommendation becomes more nuanced. Ultra settings at 87 FPS provide the best visual experience and are perfectly playable for most users, especially those with 90 Hz or 120 Hz displays. High settings at 99 FPS offer a 14% frame rate improvement over Ultra while maintaining most visual quality. Medium settings at 111 FPS would be the choice for users seeking higher frame rates, while Low settings at 132 FPS is recommended primarily for those with 120 Hz or 144 Hz displays who want to get closer to their monitor's maximum refresh rate.

The Medium settings preset provides the most balanced experience across all resolutions, with frame rates that remain high while maintaining good visual quality. At 1080p Medium, the system delivers 220 FPS average with minimum of 187 FPS, ensuring no noticeable stuttering even in demanding scenes. At 1440p Medium, 165 FPS average with 140 FPS minimum keeps gameplay smooth. At 4K Medium, 111 FPS average with 94 FPS minimum still provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. For most users, Medium settings offer the best combination of visual fidelity and performance headroom, making it the recommended preset unless specific display requirements dictate otherwise.