Dave The Diver

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT pairs a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 design with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz and a base clock of 3.60 GHz. This CPU configuration is the primary driver for the game's logic and frame pacing, particularly at lower resolutions where the graphics card is less likely to be the limiting factor. The processor’s 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support contribute to its overall responsiveness. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a single-thread score of 913 in 3DMark and a multi-thread score of 5554 at max threads, indicating a balanced performance profile that can handle both light and heavily threaded workloads. Its average benchmark score of 20733 places it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, making it a competent mid-range part. Benchmark results show it trails the Intel Core i5-12490F by a marginal 0.3% in average score, which suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 5600GT provides a near-identical experience to that rival.

The CPU’s performance in this game is best understood through its threading capabilities. With 12 threads available, the Ryzen 5 5600GT can efficiently distribute the game’s background tasks, such as AI for sea creatures and resource management, without starving the main game loop of processing power. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 4968 is notably close to the max-thread score of 5554, showing that the processor scales well with additional threads up to a point. This indicates that while the game may not utilize all 12 threads perfectly, the headroom provided by the extra cores prevents severe bottlenecks. The single-thread performance, represented by a 3DMark single-thread score of 913, is adequate for the game’s primary simulation thread, ensuring that the core gameplay mechanics remain fluid. For a game like Dave The Diver, which is not typically considered a high-end CPU stress test, this processor’s performance is more than sufficient to keep up with the GPU at standard settings. The data suggests that the CPU will not be the bottleneck in most scenarios, especially when comparing its scores to the demands of the game.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT’s 6 cores and 12 threads provide a solid foundation for Dave The Diver’s CPU demands. The game’s simulation of the ocean ecosystem, including fish AI and dynamic events, benefits from the multi-threaded capacity of the processor. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz ensures that single-threaded operations, which are often critical for frame pacing, are executed swiftly. This is reflected in the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2438, which is a strong indicator of its ability to handle the game’s primary logic thread. The multi-core performance, as shown by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17272, provides ample headroom for background tasks, preventing frame hitches when the game loads new areas or spawns multiple entities.

In the measured FPS data, the CPU’s role becomes more apparent at 1080p resolution. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average frame rate reaches 108 FPS, which is the highest recorded across all configurations. This high frame rate suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to maintain a high output, even when the graphical load is minimal. The difference between the Low and Ultra settings at 1080p is 36 FPS, dropping from 108 to 72 FPS. This indicates that while the GPU is the primary factor in graphical settings scaling, the CPU’s consistent performance ensures that the frame rate does not collapse when the settings are lowered. The processor’s 74th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that it is a significantly above-average performer, meaning that users with this CPU can expect no major CPU-induced slowdowns in this title.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, which is a substantial clock speed for an integrated solution. The GPU has 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output pipelines. Its memory subsystem is system-shared, meaning it uses the system’s DDR4 memory rather than dedicated VRAM. This makes the memory bandwidth dependent on the system configuration, which can be a limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU’s performance is modest, as indicated by its 9th percentile ranking among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 1482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX by 1.3%, placing it in the same performance tier as decade-old entry-level discrete GPUs.

The GPU’s role in Dave The Diver is critical at higher resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 36 FPS, which is the lowest recorded. This highlights the GPU’s struggle to maintain playable frame rates at 4K with maximum graphical fidelity. The system-shared memory is a significant factor here, as the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory bandwidth, which can lead to stuttering in demanding scenes. The 12 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate indicate that the GPU is architecturally modern, but its raw compute power is limited. The FP32 performance of 7.680 TFLOPS is not sufficient for high-resolution gaming with intensive effects. However, at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the GPU can achieve an average of 108 FPS, showing that it can handle the game well when the graphical load is reduced. The GPU’s performance scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 36 FPS drop, which is proportionally similar to the CPU’s scaling, but the absolute numbers are lower, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor for higher settings.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT compare to its closest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20733, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i5-12490F’s score of 20802. This makes the two processors virtually identical in overall performance.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this CPU and GPU combo, and at what settings?

A: The highest average frame rate is 108 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the measured data to exceed 100 FPS.

Q: What is the Intel Arc B390’s performance rank compared to all other GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B390 ranks in the 9th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1482. This places it in the lower tier of graphics processors, comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX.

Q: How much does the frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings?

A: At Medium settings, the average frame rate drops from 91 FPS at 1920x1080 to 46 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 45 FPS reduction when moving to 4K resolution.

Q: Does the combo perform better in single-threaded or multi-threaded CPU benchmarks?

A: The CPU shows a balanced profile. Its 3DMark single-thread score is 913, while its max-thread score is 5554. The multi-thread score is about 6 times higher than the single-thread score, but the single-thread score is still respectable for gaming.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo at 1440p Medium settings?

A: The minimum FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 58 FPS. The maximum FPS in that same configuration is 78 FPS, giving an average of 68 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and Intel Arc B390 ranks 2538th out of 2867 tested combos for Dave The Diver. This places the combo in the bottom 12% of all configurations tested, which is expected given the GPU’s low performance percentile. The CPU’s relatively strong performance is overshadowed by the GPU’s limitations, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The data shows that the combo is more capable at 1080p, where the CPU can push the GPU to its limits, but it falls behind at 4K, where the GPU’s lack of dedicated VRAM and low compute power becomes a major bottleneck. The rank of 2538 suggests that while the system is functional for this game, it is not competitive with the majority of other tested configurations, which likely include discrete GPUs with significantly higher performance. This ranking is a direct result of the GPU’s 9th percentile standing, which drags down the overall combo’s capability despite the CPU’s 74th percentile performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves its best results. With Low settings, the average FPS is 108, which is the only configuration to break the 100 FPS mark. Medium settings reduce the average to 91 FPS, with a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 104 FPS. High settings yield an average of 81 FPS, while Ultra settings drop the average to 72 FPS. This shows a clear 36 FPS spread between the lowest and highest settings at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is the primary factor in graphical fidelity scaling.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance decreases across all settings. Low settings average 82 FPS, Medium settings average 68 FPS with a minimum of 58 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS, High settings average 61 FPS, and Ultra settings average 54 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 28 FPS, which is narrower than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU is becoming more of a bottleneck as resolution increases. At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low settings average 55 FPS, Medium settings average 46 FPS with a minimum of 39 FPS and a maximum of 53 FPS, High settings average 41 FPS, and Ultra settings average 36 FPS. The spread at 4K is 19 FPS, which is the smallest of all resolutions, indicating that the GPU is heavily limited and cannot adequately scale with settings at this resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For a smooth 60 FPS experience at 1920x1080, the Ultra preset provides an average of 72 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. However, for those seeking higher frame rates for a more responsive feel, the Low preset at 108p delivers 108 FPS, which is a significant improvement over Ultra. The Medium preset at 1080p offers a balance with 91 FPS, making it a strong choice for most users who want a mix of quality and performance.

At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 61 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target, but the Low preset at 82 FPS provides a more comfortable margin. For a consistent 60 FPS at 1440p, the Medium preset at 68 FPS is the recommended choice, as it offers a higher frame rate than High while still providing better visual quality than Low. At 3840x2160, achieving 60 FPS is not possible with any settings, as the highest average is 55 FPS at Low. The Medium preset at 46 FPS is the best option for a playable experience at 4K, balancing frame rate and visual fidelity. Users prioritizing frame rate over visuals should stick to 1080p with Medium or Low settings, while those who accept lower frame rates can enjoy the game at 1440p with Medium settings.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component of this combo. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 108 at 1920x1080 to 82 at 2560x1440, and finally to 55 at 3840x2160. This represents a 49% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 1440p, and a 33% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The consistent decline indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as its system-shared memory and limited compute power cannot keep up with the increasing pixel count. The CPU’s performance remains relatively constant, so the frame rate drop is almost entirely attributable to the GPU’s workload.

At Medium settings, the frame rate drops from 91 FPS at 1080p to 68 FPS at 1440p, and then to 46 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 25% and 32%, respectively, showing that the GPU’s limitations become more pronounced at higher resolutions. At High settings, the frame rate drops from 81 FPS at 1080p to 61 FPS at 1440p, and then to 41 FPS at 4K, with drops of 25% and 33%. The Ultra settings show a similar pattern, with frame rates dropping from 72 FPS at 1080p to 54 FPS at 1440p, and then to 36 FPS at 4K, representing drops of 25% and 33%. This consistent pattern across all settings confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU’s performance does not scale with resolution. The data indicates that the Intel Arc B390 is best utilized at 1080p, where it can deliver playable frame rates, while higher resolutions will require a significant reduction in graphical settings to maintain acceptable performance.