Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

AVERAGE FPS
641
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 641 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 292 342 395 464
1440p QHD 494 578 668 785
1080p Full HD 717 841 971 1,141

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 464
3840x2160 Medium 395
3840x2160 High 342
3840x2160 Ultra 292
2560x1440 Low 785
2560x1440 Medium 668
2560x1440 High 578
2560x1440 Ultra 494
1920x1080 Low 1,141
1920x1080 Medium 971
1920x1080 High 841
1920x1080 Ultra 717

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers exceptional frame rates in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with the data showing this combination ranks 241st out of 3,719 tested combos. Across all resolutions and settings, the measured average FPS never drops below 292, indicating that this system is overwhelmingly GPU-limited at lower resolutions and CPU-limited only at extreme frame rates. The benchmark results point to a clear conclusion: for CS:GO, this combo is overkill for standard displays but provides headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1440p and 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep but consistent with a game that scales well with resolution. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 841 at 1920x1080 to 578 at 2560x1440, a 31% reduction, and then to 342 at 3840x2160, another 41% drop. This pattern indicates that the RTX 4080’s rendering load increases predictably with pixel count, while the CPU’s contribution remains relatively constant. At Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced: 1,141 FPS at 1080p drops to 785 at 1440p (31% lower) and then to 464 at 4K (another 41% lower). The consistent percentage drops across settings suggest that resolution is the dominant factor in frame rate changes, not the preset level.

The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, Low yields 1,141 FPS while Ultra yields 717 FPS, a difference of 424 FPS (37%). At 4K, Low produces 464 FPS versus 292 FPS on Ultra, a gap of 172 FPS (37%). This proportional difference indicates that the GPU is scaling its workload evenly with both resolution and settings, without hitting a hard bottleneck at any point. The 4K Ultra result of 292 FPS still exceeds the refresh rate of most high-end monitors, so even the most demanding configuration remains playable.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU becomes the limiting component. The jump from 841 FPS at High to 1,141 FPS at Low represents a 36% increase, which is larger than the 14% increase seen at 4K (from 342 to 464 FPS). This behavior is typical of a system where the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them at lower resolutions, but at 4K the GPU’s rendering time dominates. The i5-12600KF’s 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, are sufficient to push frame rates well beyond 1,000 FPS at 1080p Low, but the RTX 4080’s rendering pipeline becomes the constraint as pixel counts rise.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gaming, the Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 1,141, which is 59% higher than the Ultra preset’s 717 FPS. However, the Medium preset offers a balanced 971 FPS, only 15% below Low, while providing better visual quality. The High preset at 841 FPS is also viable, sitting 26% below Low. Given that CS:GO is a competitive FPS where frame rate matters more than visual fidelity, the Low preset at 1080p maximizes performance, but Medium provides a strong compromise with 971 FPS and a minimum of 825 FPS, ensuring no noticeable stutter.

At 1440p, the Medium preset again stands out. It delivers 668 FPS average with a minimum of 568 FPS, while High produces 578 FPS and Low reaches 785 FPS. The gap between Medium and Low is 17%, but Medium’s minimum FPS of 568 is still far above any display refresh rate. For players with 144Hz or 240Hz monitors, the Medium preset’s 668 FPS average provides ample headroom. Ultra at 494 FPS is also acceptable, but the 26% drop from Medium to Ultra may not justify the visual gains in a fast-paced shooter.

At 4K, the Low preset’s 464 FPS average is the clear winner, beating Medium’s 395 FPS by 17% and High’s 342 FPS by 36%. Ultra drops to 292 FPS, which is still above 240Hz but represents a 37% reduction from Low. The Medium preset’s minimum FPS of 335 is the only measured minimum at 4K, and it stays comfortably above typical refresh rates. For 4K gaming, Low is recommended for maximum smoothness, while Medium offers a better visual experience with only a 15% FPS penalty. The data shows that no preset at any resolution drops below 292 FPS, so even the most demanding settings remain playable.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12600KF features 10 cores, 16 threads, a base clock of 3.70 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. Its benchmark scores indicate strong multi-threaded performance: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,391 and a single-core score of 3,302. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,956 and max-thread score of 7,952 are nearly identical, suggesting that the CPU’s performance scales well with thread count up to 16 threads)Skip the single-thread score of 1,016 in 3DMark is notably lower, but for CS:GO, which relies heavily on single-thread performance, the boost clock of 4.90 GHz is the more relevant metric.

The CPU’s role in this game is evident in the 1080p results. At Low settings, the average FPS of 1,141 approaches the limits of what the CPU can feed, and the jump to 1,141 from 971 at Medium (18% increase) shows that reducing GPU load allows the CPU to stretch further. At 4K, the CPU’s influence diminishes: the difference between Low and Medium at 4K is only 17% (464 vs. 395 FPS), compared to 18% at 1080p. The processor’s 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache help maintain low latency for game logic, which is critical for CS:GO’s tick-rate-dependent gameplay.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-12600KF sits within 0.3% of the Intel Core i9-10900K, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, and AMD Ryzen 7 6800U in average benchmark score. The 5800X3D, known for gaming performance, shows a delta of -0.3%, meaning the i5-12600KF is essentially tied. This parity explains why the CPU does not become a bottleneck in most scenarios; its performance is on par with top-tier gaming processors from the same era. The 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that it outperforms the majority of processors, though it is not at the absolute top.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the i5-12600KF and RTX 4080 achieves a rank of 241 out of 3,719 tested combos in CS:GO, placing it in the top 6.5% of all configurations. This high rank is driven primarily by the GPU’s raw power, as the RTX 4080’s performance percentile of 86 puts it well above most graphics cards. The CPU’s 79th percentile also contributes positively, but the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing.

The combo’s rank reflects its ability to maintain high frame rates across all settings. At 4K Ultra, the 292 FPS average is higher than what most systems achieve at 1080p, indicating that this combo handles the most demanding scenario without issue. The RTX 4080’s nearest rivals include the RTX 4080 SUPER with a delta of 0.1%, meaning the non-SUPER is virtually identical in performance, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, which scores 2.6% higher in average benchmark. These small deltas suggest that the GPU’s performance is well-established and not an outlier.

Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing’s 241st rank is impressive given that CS:GO is not a graphically demanding title. The fact that it ranks higher than 3,478 other combos indicates that the hardware combination excels in this specific game, likely due to the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s massive bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory is more than sufficient for CS:GO’s modest VRAM requirements, further solidifying the combo’s position.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC, featuring 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. Its base clock of 2,205 MHz and boost clock of 2,505 MHz allow it to sustain high frame rates, while the 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs handle CS:GO’s simple geometry and lighting with ease, as evidenced by the consistently high FPS.

The GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at 4K, where the rendering load increases. At 4K Ultra, the 292 FPS average is 74% lower than the 1080p Low result of 1,141 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU’s fill rate and pixel throughput are the limiting factors at higher resolutions. The pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s are more than adequate for this title, but the sheer number of pixels at 4K still reduces performance. The RTX 4080’s 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it near the top, and its average benchmark score of 54,247 is within 2.7% of the AMD Radeon 8060S, its closest rival.

The GPU’s boost clock of 2,505 MHz is critical for CS:GO, as the game benefits from high clock speeds rather than advanced features like ray tracing. The RTX 4080’s 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores are idle in this game, but the raw FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS drives the standard rasterization. The 1x 16-pin power connector and 320 W TDP indicate a power-hungry card, but the measured FPS justifies this power draw in terms of raw performance. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is never stressed, as CS:GO’s textures are small, but the 16 GB capacity ensures future-proofing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields the highest average FPS at 1,141, followed by Medium at 971 (with a minimum of 825 and maximum of 1,117), High at 841, and Ultra at 717. The Medium preset’s minimum of 825 FPS is the only minimum recorded at this resolution, confirming that even the most demanding moments stay above 800 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 424 FPS, representing a 37% reduction, which is consistent across resolutions.

At 2560x1440, Low again leads with 785 FPS, then Medium at 668 (minimum 568, maximum 768), High at 578, and Ultra at 494. The Medium preset’s minimum of 568 FPS is 15% lower than its average, indicating some frame variability, but still far above any display refresh rate. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 291 FPS (37% lower), matching the 1080p percentage reduction. This consistency suggests that the GPU scales linearly with both resolution and settings.

At 3840x2160, Low produces 464 FPS, Medium 395 (minimum 335, maximum 454), High 342, and Ultra 292. The Medium preset’s minimum of 335 FPS is the lowest recorded in the entire dataset, but it remains well above 240Hz. The drop from 1080p Low to 4K Low is 59% (1,141 to 464 FPS), while the drop from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra is 59% as well (717 to 292 FPS). This proportional scaling confirms that the RTX 4080 handles resolution increases consistently, regardless of settings. Across all 12 measured rows, the average FPS never falls below 292, and the highest is 1,141, demonstrating that this combo delivers exceptional performance in CS:GO at any configuration.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12600KF

Cores / Threads 10 / 16
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4900 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2505 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 464.0
3840x2160 Medium 395.0
3840x2160 High 342.0
3840x2160 Ultra 292.0
2560x1440 Low 785.0
2560x1440 Medium 668.0
2560x1440 High 578.0
2560x1440 Ultra 494.0
1920x1080 Low 1,141.0
1920x1080 Medium 971.0
1920x1080 High 841.0
1920x1080 Ultra 717.0

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with ii5-12600KF + Other GPUs

See how Counter-Strike: Global Offensive performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs

See how Counter-Strike: Global Offensive performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12600KF + RTX 4080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.