Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

AVERAGE FPS
413
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 413 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 189 222 257 298
1440p QHD 317 372 429 508
1080p Full HD 465 539 625 735

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 298
3840x2160 Medium 257
3840x2160 High 222
3840x2160 Ultra 189
2560x1440 Low 508
2560x1440 Medium 429
2560x1440 High 372
2560x1440 Ultra 317
1920x1080 Low 735
1920x1080 Medium 625
1920x1080 High 539
1920x1080 Ultra 465

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with Intel Core i3-12100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is not a typical stress test for modern hardware, and the measured frame rates for the Intel Core i3-12100F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combo confirm this. The data shows a system that is overwhelmingly capable, with average frame rates that never dip below the triple-digit mark even at the most demanding settings and resolution. The benchmark results indicate that the primary bottleneck shifts depending on the resolution, but the sheer headroom available makes this pairing exceptionally fluid for competitive play.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic transition from a CPU-bound scenario to a GPU-bound one. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces an average of 734.5 FPS. This staggering figure suggests the CPU is the primary limiting factor, as the GPU has minimal work to do, allowing the processor's single-thread performance to dictate the output. Moving to 2560x1440 at Low settings, the average drops to 507.6 FPS, a significant reduction of roughly 31%. This decline continues at 3840x2160, where Low settings yield 298.4 FPS, another 41% drop from the 1440p figure. The scaling pattern shows that as pixel count increases, the GPU's workload grows, and the frame rate becomes more dependent on the graphics card's fill rate and bandwidth.

The scaling is more linear when looking at High settings, which is a more realistic usage scenario. At 1080p High, the system averages 539.3 FPS. At 1440p High, this falls to 371.6 FPS, a 31% reduction. At 4K High, the average is 222 FPS, a 40% drop from 1440p. This consistent scaling pattern indicates that the RTX 3070's capabilities are being progressively taxed as resolution increases. The data suggests that at 1080p, the Core i3-12100F is the limiting component, as the frame rates are so high that the GPU is likely waiting on the CPU to feed it data. At 4K, however, the tables turn, and the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with the CPU having ample headroom to keep up with the graphics card's demands.

The most telling comparison is the gap between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low (734.5 FPS) and Ultra (464.9 FPS) is 269.6 FPS. At 1440p, the gap narrows to 190.4 FPS (507.6 vs 317.2). At 4K, the gap shrinks further to 109.1 FPS (298.4 vs 189.3). This shrinking delta indicates that at lower resolutions, CPU performance and memory latency play a larger role in determining the frame rate, while at higher resolutions, the GPU's raw rendering power becomes the dominant factor. The RTX 3070's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to handle the higher resolution textures without a significant performance cliff, but the incremental gains from lowering settings become less impactful as the GPU's pixel throughput becomes the wall.

Settings Recommendations

For players seeking the highest possible frame rates for competitive advantage, the Low preset at any resolution is the clear choice. At 1080p, Low settings deliver 734.5 FPS, which is 57% higher than the Ultra preset at the same resolution. Even at 4K, Low settings provide 298.4 FPS, which is still well above the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. The data indicates that the Low preset minimizes GPU load, allowing the CPU to stretch its legs and produce frame rates that are effectively uncapped for any current display technology.

However, the Medium preset offers a compelling balance for those who want better visual fidelity without sacrificing the competitive edge. At 1080p, Medium produces 624.7 FPS, which is still 15% higher than High settings and 34% higher than Ultra. The drop from Low to Medium is noticeable at 14.9%, but the visual improvement in a game like CS:GO is often minimal due to its art style. At 1440p, Medium delivers 428.6 FPS, which remains exceptionally high. The Ultra preset, while visually richer, shows a significant performance cost: at 1080p, it drops to 464.9 FPS, and at 4K, it falls to 189.3 FPS.

Given the measured data, the High preset appears to be the sweet spot for most users. It provides a substantial visual upgrade over Medium while maintaining frame rates that are still far beyond what is needed for smooth gameplay. At 1080p High, the 539.3 FPS average is more than enough for any 360Hz monitor, and at 1440p High, the 371.6 FPS average comfortably exceeds the capabilities of most high-refresh-rate panels. The Ultra preset is difficult to recommend unless the user prioritizes image quality over raw performance, as the 4K Ultra result of 189.3 FPS, while playable, is the only configuration in the data set that approaches the threshold where frame rate consistency might become a concern on very high refresh rate displays. The data strongly suggests that High settings provide the best experience per measured row, offering a robust balance of visual quality and performance headroom.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 operates with a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1725 MHz, built on the Ampere architecture with 5888 shading units. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. In this specific game, the GPU's role is less about raw compute and more about maintaining high frame rates at higher resolutions. The benchmark results show that the RTX 3070 is never the limiting factor at 1080p, where the CPU holds the system back. However, at 4K, the GPU's performance becomes the defining characteristic of the system.

The memory configuration is sufficient for CS:GO, as the game's textures are not particularly demanding. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is ample for the data transfer needs at 4K resolution, and the 8 GB capacity shows no signs of being a constraint. The GPU's compute capabilities, measured at 20.31 TFLOPS FP32, are far more than this title requires. The data indicates that the RTX 3070's performance is well-matched to the Core i3-12100F at 1440p, where both components are working in concert to produce frame rates above 300 FPS on most settings.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 72 places it in the upper echelon of graphics cards, and its average benchmark score of 28238 is competitive. In the context of CS:GO, the RTX 3070's strengths are somewhat underutilized at lower resolutions, but at 4K, it demonstrates its value. The transition from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a 36.5% performance reduction (from 298.4 to 189.3 FPS), which is a direct result of the GPU's increased workload with more complex shading and effects. The RTX 3070's boost clock of 1725 MHz is a key factor in its ability to maintain these high frame rates, as the frequency scaling directly impacts the pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i3-12100F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination ranks 753rd out of 1605 tested combos in this game. This places the pairing in the upper-middle tier of all tested systems, which is a strong result given the CPU's modest specifications. The CPU itself has a percentile ranking of 72 against all processors, meaning it outperforms nearly three-quarters of the CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 13516 is remarkably close to that of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which scores 13534, a negligible 0.1% difference.

The ranking of 753 out of 1605 indicates that while this combo is not at the absolute top of the leaderboard, it is well above the median. This is primarily due to the CPU's limitations in a game that is notoriously sensitive to single-thread performance. The Core i3-12100F's single-thread benchmark scores are strong (893 in 3dmark single thread), but its 4-core, 8-thread configuration may cause occasional frame pacing issues in scenarios with many entities. The GPU's ranking is notably higher, with a percentile of 72 against all GPUs, but the combo rank is dragged down by the CPU's relative position.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Core i3-12100F is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-1250U and Intel Core i3-10105, which are 0.4% and 0.6% ahead, respectively. It is 1.8% behind the Intel Core i7-7700K. These marginal differences suggest that the CPU's performance is consistent with other mid-range options. The combo's rank of 753 indicates that there are many other systems with faster CPUs that can achieve higher frame rates in CS:GO, but the RTX 3070 ensures that this combo remains highly playable at all resolutions. The data shows that the GPU is not the limiting factor in this pairing's rank; rather, the CPU's 4-core architecture is the primary constraint preventing this combo from breaking into the top 500.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate this combo achieves at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate is 734.5 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The lowest at that resolution is 464.9 FPS on Ultra.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K compared to 1080p on High settings?

A: At 3840x2160 High, the average frame rate is 222 FPS, which is a 58.8% reduction from the 539.3 FPS seen at 1920x1080 High. The frame rate drops by 317.3 FPS when moving from 1080p to 4K.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 1440p?

A: The data suggests a balanced workload at 2560x1440. The frame rates range from 507.6 FPS on Low to 317.2 FPS on Ultra, indicating that both the CPU and GPU are being utilized effectively, with neither component being severely limiting.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems in this game?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination ranks 753rd out of 1605 tested combos, placing it in the 47th percentile of all systems tested.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves 298.4 FPS, while Ultra achieves 189.3 FPS. The Low preset is 57.6% faster than Ultra, a difference of 109.1 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU's performance match other processors in its class?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13516, which is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i7-1250U. It is 1.8% ahead of the Intel Core i7-7700K.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i3-12100F

Cores / Threads 4 / 8
Base Clock 3300 MHz
Boost Clock 4300 MHz
TDP 58W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1725 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 298.4
3840x2160 Medium 256.5
3840x2160 High 222.0
3840x2160 Ultra 189.3
2560x1440 Low 507.6
2560x1440 Medium 428.6
2560x1440 High 371.6
2560x1440 Ultra 317.2
1920x1080 Low 734.5
1920x1080 Medium 624.7
1920x1080 High 539.3
1920x1080 Ultra 464.9

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs

See how Counter-Strike: Global Offensive performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs

See how Counter-Strike: Global Offensive performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii3-12100F + RTX 3070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.