Counter-Strike 2
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 379 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 136 | 175 | 234 | 282 |
| 1440p QHD | 243 | 313 | 420 | 505 |
| 1080p Full HD | 368 | 473 | 634 | 763 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike 2 with Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 presents a fascinating study in bottleneck dynamics within Counter-Strike 2. The data shows a combination where a high-refresh-rate esports title meets a flagship graphics card, producing a spread of results that reveals much about where the CPU and GPU each take the lead. This analysis explores the measured FPS across resolutions and settings, interpreting what the numbers indicate about the balance of this pairing.
FAQ
Q: What is the measured average FPS at 1080p with Low settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combination delivers an average of 763 FPS. This is the highest average recorded across all tested configurations in the data.
Q: How does the frame rate at 4K Ultra compare to the frame rate at 1080p Low?
A: The 4K Ultra preset produces an average of 136 FPS, which is significantly lower than the 763 FPS seen at 1080p Low. This represents a substantial performance drop as resolution and graphical load increase.
Q: What is the combo's overall rank among all tested system combinations in this game?
A: This specific CPU and GPU pairing ranks 68th out of 3,719 total tested combos in Counter-Strike 2. This places it within the top 2% of all configurations tested.
Q: What is the only resolution and settings combination that includes min and max FPS data?
A: The Medium settings preset at all three resolutions includes this additional data. At 1080p, the min FPS is 539 and max is 729; at 1440p, the min is 357 and max is 482; at 4K, the min is 199 and max is 270.
Q: According to the benchmark scores, which component has a higher percentile ranking among its peers?
A: The GPU has a higher percentile ranking at 92, compared to the CPU's 79th percentile. This indicates the RTX 5090 sits closer to the top of its performance tier than the i5-12600KF does in its own category.
Q: How does the i5-12600KF's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D?
A: The i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27,799, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D has a score of 27,896. The delta percentage is -0.3, showing the two processors are effectively tied in overall synthetic performance.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture. Its configuration of performance and efficiency cores allows it to handle a wide range of workloads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. In synthetic benchmarks, its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,391 and single-core score of 3,302 illustrate a balanced capability that is relevant for gaming.
The CPU's performance percentile stands at 79, placing it above the majority of processors. Its average benchmark score of 27,799 is nearly identical to its closest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which scores 27,896 with a -0.3% delta. This suggests that in a CPU-bound scenario, the i5-12600KF would perform on par with that well-known gaming processor.
In Counter-Strike 2, the CPU's role is most evident at lower resolutions and settings. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 763 FPS. This is a massive leap from the 473 FPS at 1080p High, indicating that as the GPU load is reduced, the CPU is able to push frame rates much higher. The frame rate ceiling at lower graphical settings is a direct reflection of the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread throughput.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a colossal piece of hardware, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process. It features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. With a boost clock of 2407 MHz and 21,760 shading units, its raw compute power is immense, reflected in its 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs.
The GPU's synthetic benchmark scores are equally impressive, with a Passmark G3D score of 39,650 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,728. Its average benchmark score of 79,842 places it in a league of its own, with its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, trailing by a 0.3% delta. This establishes the RTX 5090 as a top-tier performer.
The GPU's influence in Counter-Strike 2 becomes apparent when resolution and settings are increased. The jump from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings shows a dramatic reduction in frame rate, from 368 FPS to 136 FPS. This demonstrates that at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, with its raw fill rate and memory bandwidth being taxed heavily by the game's engine.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent pattern across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptionally high. The Low preset yields an average of 763 FPS, which is a 61% increase over the High preset's 473 FPS. The Medium preset provides a middle ground at 634 FPS, with a minimum of 539 and a maximum of 729 FPS. The Ultra preset, while still very fast, drops to an average of 368 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the same relative hierarchy is maintained but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings produce 505 FPS, while High settings yield 313 FPS. Medium settings average 420 FPS, with a minimum of 357 and a maximum of 482 FPS. Ultra settings are again the most demanding, resulting in 243 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a performance hit of approximately 34% for the Low preset and 34% for the High preset.
At 3840x2160, the load on the system becomes substantial. The Low preset still manages an excellent 282 FPS, but the High preset drops to 175 FPS. Medium settings average 234 FPS, with a minimum of 199 and a maximum of 270 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding configuration tested, bringing the average down to 136 FPS. This data shows that even a flagship GPU is challenged by 4K Ultra in this title, though the frame rates remain perfectly playable.
How This Combo Ranks
The overall ranking for this specific pairing in Counter-Strike 2 is 68th out of 3,719 tested combinations. This is a strong result, placing the system in the top 1.8% of all configurations. The ranking considers the combined performance of the CPU and GPU, and this position suggests that the pairing is highly effective for this game.
However, the ranking also prompts a deeper investigation. Given that the RTX 5090 is the top consumer GPU and ranks in the 92nd percentile, one might expect a higher overall position. The fact that it lands at 68th suggests that the i5-12600KF is holding the system back from reaching the absolute pinnacle of performance. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking, while respectable, is the limiting factor in this equation. The data implies that to achieve a top-10 or top-20 ranking, a more powerful processor would be necessary to keep pace with the GPU's immense capabilities, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU's influence is greatest.
Settings Recommendations
The optimal settings for this combination in Counter-Strike 2 depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate of the display. The data shows that the system is capable of extraordinary frame rates, making it suitable for the highest refresh rate monitors available.
For 1080p, the Low preset is the clear choice for competitive play, delivering 763 FPS. This ensures that the system is never bound by the CPU or GPU and provides the lowest possible input latency. If a player prefers higher visual fidelity, the Medium preset at 634 FPS is still an exceptional choice, offering a balance between visuals and performance. The High and Ultra presets, while visually richer, are not necessary for a competitive edge and result in lower frame rates.
For 1440p, the Low preset at 505 FPS remains the best option for maximizing frame rate. The Medium preset at 420 FPS is also an excellent choice, providing a smooth experience with better image quality. For those with a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor, the High preset at 313 FPS is more than sufficient and offers a significant visual upgrade.
At 4K, the focus shifts from pure competitive performance to visual fidelity. The Low preset at 282 FPS is still incredibly fast, but the Medium preset at 234 FPS offers a much better visual experience. The High preset at 175 FPS is the most balanced for 4K gaming, providing high detail while still maintaining a frame rate well above 144Hz. The Ultra preset at 136 FPS is the most demanding and is only recommended for those who prioritize maximum visual quality over frame rate.
Resolution Scaling
The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K provides critical insight into which component is the primary bottleneck at different settings. The data reveals a stark difference in scaling behavior between the Low and Ultra presets.
At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 763 FPS at 1080p to 282 FPS at 4K, a 63% reduction. This massive drop indicates that the GPU is being increasingly taxed as the resolution increases, even at the lowest settings. The CPU is capable of feeding frames at a very high rate, but the GPU's rendering workload becomes the limiting factor.
At Ultra settings, the frame rate drops from 368 FPS at 1080p to 136 FPS at 4K, a 63% reduction as well. This similar percentage drop suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor across all resolutions at this setting. The absolute numbers are lower, but the scaling pattern is consistent.
The most telling comparison is between Low and Ultra at the same resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 395 FPS, while at 4K, the difference shrinks to 146 FPS. This indicates that at lower resolutions, the CPU is able to push frame rates higher, but the GPU's load from higher settings becomes more dominant. The data strongly suggests that for this pairing, the GPU is the primary performance limiter in Counter-Strike 2 at all tested configurations, with the CPU providing a very high ceiling that the GPU struggles to reach at higher resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12600KF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Counter-Strike 2
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 282.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 234.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 175.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 136.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 505.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 420.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 313.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 243.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 763.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 634.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 473.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 368.0 |
Counter-Strike 2 with ii5-12600KF + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Counter-Strike 2 with RTX 5090 + Other CPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12600KF + RTX 5090
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.