Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 92 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 45 | 57 | 61 | 83 |
| 1440p QHD | 68 | 83 | 90 | 128 |
| 1080p Full HD | 94 | 105 | 117 | 170 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
Control is a demanding Action Adventure title that stresses both CPU and GPU heavily, and the pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti produces a highly capable, if not top-tier, experience. The data shows this combination is firmly in the upper-middle tier of tested systems, with a combo rank of 624 out of 1636 in this game. This placement suggests that while the hardware is strong, it is not at the absolute advanced for maxing out every setting at the highest resolutions, but it offers a robust foundation for high-refresh-rate play at more common resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of all 1636 tested hardware combinations for Control, this pairing sits at rank 624. That places it in the 62nd percentile of all combos, meaning it outperforms a majority of systems but is outclassed by the top-tier configurations. The ranking reflects a balance where the CPU is exceptionally strong, but the GPU's position in the market holds the combo back from the very top. The Core Ultra 7 265K itself sits in the 97th percentile against all CPUs, showcasing its elite processing power, while the RTX 3070 Ti, in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, is a solid but not flagship performer. This disparity is the key takeaway: the combo is CPU-rich and GPU-moderate, which influences performance scaling across different settings and resolutions.
The data indicates that this combo is not a top-100 contender for extreme 4K Ultra settings, but it is far from a low-end performer. Its rank of 624 demonstrates that it will handle the vast majority of gaming scenarios with ease, particularly when settings are adjusted to match the target resolution. The benchmark results suggest a system that is well-balanced for 1440p gaming, where it can achieve high frame rates without being bottlenecked by the processor. The delta between this and the very best combos is likely significant, but for the target audience, the performance is more than adequate. The position confirms the CPU's strength, which prevents the system from falling further down the ranks, even with a mid-range-to-high-end GPU at the helm.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It features a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 30 MB shared L3 cache. In the context of Control, this processor provides an immense amount of headroom. The game is not known for being exceptionally CPU-bound at high resolutions, but the 265K's single-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7060, ensures that game logic and physics calculations are never a bottleneck. The high boost clock is critical for maintaining high frame rates, especially when the GPU is not saturated.
Benchmark results for the CPU show a dominant position against its nearest rivals. The Core Ultra 7 265K scores an average benchmark score of 79102, which is virtually identical to the Core Ultra 7 265KF (-0.2%) and the Core i9-14900KF (-0.2%). It is slightly behind the Core i9-14900K by 0.9% and the AMD EPYC 7413 by 1.2%. These minuscule deltas indicate that the 265K is operating at the absolute peak of consumer desktop performance. In Control, this means the CPU will not be the limiting factor. At 1080p with Low settings, where the GPU load is lightest, the system is able to push out 170 FPS, a number that would not be achievable if the processor were struggling. The 20 threads also help with any background tasks or streaming overhead, ensuring consistent frame delivery.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. It has a base clock of 1575 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz. For Control, which is a visually rich game with heavy use of particle effects and physics, the GPU is the primary determinant of performance at higher resolutions and settings. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor; at 4K with Ultra settings, the memory and processing demands are high, which is reflected in the measured FPS drop. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking against all GPUs indicates it is a solid performer, but its 8 GB frame buffer can be a constraint in the most demanding scenarios.
The GPU's average benchmark score of 30849 places it in a tight grouping with its nearest rivals. The data shows it is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME, and 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700, and 0.9% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M5000. These are the closest competitors in terms of aggregate score, but the RTX 3070 Ti's feature set, including DirectX 12 Ultimate support, makes it more suitable for modern titles like Control. The performance in this game is strong, but the limitations become apparent at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 44.5. This suggests that while the GPU is capable, it is not a 4K Ultra powerhouse for this title. At 1440p, however, it hits a sweet spot, delivering high frame rates across all settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this combo scales with resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is incredibly capable, with even the most demanding Ultra settings producing an average of 94.4 FPS. Dropping to High settings yields 104.9 FPS, while Medium produces 117.3 FPS. The Low setting pushes the average to a very high 170 FPS, indicating that the CPU and GPU are working efficiently at this resolution to eliminate any bottleneck. This makes the combo excellent for high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors, as it can easily exceed 144 FPS on lower settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected scaling. The Ultra preset produces an average of 67.8 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive play. High settings deliver a comfortable 82.8 FPS, while Medium is very smooth at 89.7 FPS. The Low setting hits 128.2 FPS, demonstrating that over 120 FPS is achievable at 1440p if visual fidelity is sacrificed. This resolution appears to be the sweet spot for this hardware, offering a balance between visual quality and high frame rates.
At 3840x2160 (4K), the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. The High preset produces an average of 57.2 FPS, which is just on the edge of smoothness. Medium settings achieve 60.5 FPS, while Low settings reach 82.8 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, drops to an average of 44.5 FPS, which is below the threshold for a consistently smooth experience. The data shows that 4K gaming with this combo requires turning down settings to Medium or High to achieve playable frame rates, and even then, it will not hit 60 FPS consistently on High. The 8 GB VRAM and the GPU's raw compute power are the limiting factors here.
FAQ
Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Control?
A: The combo ranks 624 out of 1636 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems tested for this game.
Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K compare to its closest rival, the Core Ultra 7 265KF?
A: The Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 79102, which is 0.2% lower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF's score of 79240.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve high frame rates?
A: The data shows that at 2560x1440, the combo achieves 82.8 FPS on High settings and 128.2 FPS on Low, making it the sweet spot for high refresh rates. At 1080p, it can hit 170 FPS on Low settings.
Q: Can this system handle 4K Ultra settings in Control?
A: No, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 44.5, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for a smooth experience. Medium and High settings are more viable at 4K.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti's performance compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6700?
A: The RTX 3070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 30849, which is 0.8% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6700's score of 31112.
Q: What is the difference in FPS between High and Ultra settings at 1920x1080?
A: At 1080p, the High setting produces an average of 104.9 FPS, while the Ultra setting produces an average of 94.4 FPS, a difference of 10.5 FPS.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 82.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 60.5 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 57.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 44.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 128.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 89.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 82.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 67.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 170.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 117.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 104.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 94.4 |
Control with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.