Control

The Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a compelling 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, but the data shows a predictable drop-off at 4K. At 1080p High settings, the combo averages 94 FPS, which is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay. Moving to 1440p High, the average falls to 71 FPS, a 24% reduction. At 4K High, the average plummets to 48 FPS, a further 32% drop from 1440p. This scaling pattern clearly indicates that the Radeon RX 6750 XT becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

Resolution Scaling

The performance curve from 1080p to 4K tells a clear story about system bottlenecks. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 148 FPS, which suggests the CPU is still feeding the GPU adequately. However, when settings are raised to Ultra at 1080p, the average drops to 81 FPS. This 45% reduction in performance from Low to Ultra at the same resolution points to the GPU becoming the primary constraint even at 1080p, as the Core i5-11400F has ample headroom with its 6 cores and 12 threads.

The 1440p results reinforce this trend. The difference between 1440p Low (112 FPS) and 1440p Ultra (62 FPS) is a substantial 45% performance loss, mirroring the 1080p scaling. The jump from 1440p High (71 FPS) to 4K High (48 FPS) represents a 32% decline, which is a steeper drop than the 26% reduction seen when moving from 1080p High (94 FPS) to 1440p High (71 FPS). This intensifying penalty at higher resolutions is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario.

At 4K, the RX 6750 XT is clearly overtaxed. Even at 4K Low, the average FPS is 76, which is below the 1080p Ultra result of 81 FPS. The 4K Ultra setting yields just 42 FPS, making it marginal for a smooth experience. The data indicates that the 4K performance is constrained entirely by the GPU's 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the CPU's impact on frame rates diminishes significantly beyond 1440p. For users targeting 4K, the scaling suggests a need for lower settings or a more powerful GPU.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?*

A: The data shows 1440p as the sweet spot. At High settings, the combo averages 71 FPS, which is a good balance between visual quality and smoothness. While 1080p High reaches 94 FPS, the visual upgrade at 1440p is substantial, and the frame rate remains highly playable.

Q: How does the RX 6750 XT perform at 4K in this game?

A: Performance at 4K is limited. The average FPS ranges from 76 at Low settings to 42 at Ultra settings. For a consistent 60 FPS experience, users would need to stick to Low or Medium settings, as Medium averages 54 FPS.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-11400F a bottleneck for the RX 6750 XT?

A: Based on the scaling, the CPU is not a significant bottleneck at higher resolutions. The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is consistent with GPU limitations. At 1080p Low, the high 148 FPS average indicates the CPU can drive the GPU effectively, but the GPU's limits become apparent when settings are increased.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, the High preset averages 71 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 62 FPS. This represents a 13% performance penalty for the visual upgrade to Ultra, which may be a worthwhile trade for some users.

Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for 4K in this title?

A: The RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. While this is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, the 4K Ultra results (42 FPS) suggest that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute power are the limiting factors, not necessarily the VRAM capacity alone.

Q: How does this combo's performance compare to other tested configurations?

A: This specific combo ranks 1712 out of 3720 tested combos in Control, placing it in the upper half of all configurations. The CPU and GPU each sit at the 71st percentile among their respective categories.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the decisive component in this pairing for Control. Its specifications—12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth—are directly reflected in the measured frame rates. The GPU's boost clock of 2600 MHz and game clock of 2495 MHz contribute to its 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is what drives the rendering workload.

The GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution and settings increase. At 1080p Low, the frame rate of 148 FPS shows the GPU is not the limiting factor, as the CPU can keep up with the lower graphical load. However, at 1080p Ultra, the average drops to 81 FPS, a 45% reduction. This indicates that the GPU's shading units (2560) and texture units (160) are being fully utilized at higher settings, and the CPU is no longer the primary constraint.

At 4K, the GPU's limitations are stark. The 4K Medium result of 54 FPS (with a min of 46 FPS) shows that even moderate settings can cause frame dips below 50 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 42 FPS confirms that the GPU is saturated. The 64 ROPs and 166.4 GPixel/s pixel rate are insufficient for the pixel count at 4K, leading to the observed performance degradation. The GPU's 250 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a high-power part, but the benchmark results show its compute capabilities are the deciding factor in Control's demanding scenes.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested configurations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-11400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT achieves a rank of 1712 out of 3720 total combos for Control. This places it in the 54th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms more than half of the combinations in the database. The rank is a holistic measure that accounts for the average performance across all tested resolutions and settings.

The components themselves are evenly matched in terms of their overall standing. The CPU's average benchmark score is 17177, which places it at the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7H12, scores 17120, a mere 0.3% difference. Similarly, the GPU's average benchmark score is 26011, also at the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, scores 25891, a 0.5% difference.

The combination's rank of 1712 suggests that while the individual components are strong, the pairing is not exceptional in the context of Control. The measured FPS data shows that the combo excels at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K performance drags down its overall standing. This is a common pattern for mid-range to upper-mid-range hardware, where high refresh rate 1080p and 1440p gaming are the primary strengths. The rank indicates that a user with this setup would have a better experience than a majority of other configurations, but there is clear headroom for improvement at the highest resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. The Low preset averages 148 FPS, providing a very high refresh rate experience. The Medium preset averages 105 FPS, with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 121 FPS, showing good frame consistency. The High preset averages 94 FPS, which is still excellent for a smooth experience. The Ultra preset averages 81 FPS, which is the lowest result at this resolution but remains highly playable. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 45% performance drop, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor at the highest settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates decrease but remain solid. The Low preset averages 112 FPS, which is a drop of 24% from the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset averages 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. The High preset averages 71 FPS, which is a 24% drop from the 1080p High result. The Ultra preset averages 62 FPS, which is a 23% drop from the 1080p Ultra result. The consistent percentage drops across settings at 1440p reinforce the GPU-bound nature of the workload at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a significant hit. The Low preset averages 76 FPS, which is 49% lower than the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset averages 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS, indicating occasional frame dips below the 50 FPS threshold. The High preset averages 48 FPS, which is a 32% drop from the 1440p High result. The Ultra preset averages 42 FPS, which is the lowest recorded result and is not ideal for a smooth experience. The 4K results show a steep performance cliff, with the GPU's compute resources being the primary bottleneck.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the High preset at 1440p offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, with an average of 71 FPS. This configuration provides a smooth experience while benefiting from the higher resolution offered by a 1440p display. For users with 1080p monitors, the High preset at 94 FPS is an excellent choice, as it provides a high frame rate without sacrificing much visual quality compared to Ultra.

For those who prioritize frame rate above all else, the Low preset at 1080p (148 FPS) or 1440p (112 FPS) is the clear winner. These settings are ideal for competitive play or for users with high refresh rate monitors. The Medium preset is a solid middle ground, offering 105 FPS at 1080p and 80 FPS at 1440p, with the 1440p Medium result showing good consistency with a minimum of 68 FPS.

At 4K, the data suggests that only the Low preset (76 FPS) provides a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset (54 FPS) is playable but has a minimum of 46 FPS, which may be noticeable in fast-paced action. The High preset (48 FPS) and Ultra preset (42 FPS) are not recommended for a smooth experience, as they fall below the 60 FPS target. Users with 4K displays should either lower the resolution to 1440p or stick to the Low preset at 4K to maintain playable frame rates. The Ultra preset, while visually impressive, is only suitable for users who prioritize graphics over performance and are willing to tolerate sub-50 FPS averages.