Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 105 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 52 | 61 | 72 | 97 |
| 1440p QHD | 78 | 93 | 101 | 148 |
| 1080p Full HD | 108 | 123 | 138 | 194 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is a study in asymmetric pairing: a quad-core processor with a top-tier GPU. In Control, the data reveals that this combination delivers a playable experience across most settings, but the scaling behavior exposes where the bottleneck shifts. The measured FPS ranges from 194.3 at 1080p Low down to 52 at 4K Ultra, with the gap between presets shrinking as resolution climbs. This is not a match that maximizes the GPU’s potential at lower resolutions, but it holds its own at 4K, where the rendering load finally aligns with the graphics card’s strengths.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep, but the pattern is telling. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 194.3 FPS, which falls to 147.6 at 1440p Low and then to 96.8 at 4K Low. That is a 50.2% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, indicating that the GPU is not fully saturated at the lower resolutions — the CPU is likely limiting the frame rate. The same trend appears at High settings: 122.7 FPS at 1080p, 92.6 at 1440p, and 61.3 at 4K. The 1080p-to-4K drop here is 50%, nearly identical to Low, which suggests that even with higher graphics loads, the CPU keeps the GPU from stretching its legs at 1080p.
The Ultra preset tells a different story. At 1080p Ultra, the combo hits 108 FPS, which drops to 77.7 at 1440p and 52 at 4K. The percentage loss from 1080p to 4K is 51.9%, slightly larger than the other presets, indicating that the GPU is becoming the primary limiter as the render load increases. The data shows that at 4K, the gap between Low and Ultra is 44.8 FPS, whereas at 1080p, that same gap is 86.3 FPS. This compression at higher resolutions confirms that the RX 9070 XT is the binding constraint at 4K, while the i3-12100F’s four cores hold back performance at 1080p.
How This Combo Ranks
In Control, this combination ranks 428 out of 1,636 tested combos, placing it in the upper quartile of all pairings. That rank reflects a system that can handle the game well, but it is not near the top, where more balanced CPU-GPU matches reside. The CPU alone sits at the 72nd percentile against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 13,516. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX at 13,534 (-0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i7-7700K at 13,280 (1.8% delta), showing that the i3-12100F is competitive with much older high-end parts despite its modest core count.
The GPU, meanwhile, ranks at the 82nd percentile against all graphics cards, with an average score of 39,647. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 575 (39,703, -0.1% delta) and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39,568, 0.2% delta), which are professional or mobile parts, not direct gaming competitors. The rank of 428 out of 1,636 suggests that the combo is better than average, but the CPU’s lower standing relative to the GPU means the pairing is not fully exploiting the graphics card’s capabilities. In a game like Control, which benefits from strong single-thread performance, the i3-12100F’s single-core score of 893 in 3DMark and 1,681 in Cinebench R23 helps, but the four cores limit multi-threaded scaling.
FAQ
*Q: Is this combo capable of running Control at 4K?*
A: Yes, but only at Low settings does it exceed 60 FPS, hitting 96.8 FPS. At Medium, it drops to 72.2 FPS, High to 61.3 FPS, and Ultra falls below 60 FPS at 52 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution to use with this pairing?
A: At 1440p, the combo offers a strong balance: 147.6 FPS at Low, 101.1 at Medium, 92.6 at High, and 77.7 at Ultra. This resolution avoids the CPU bottleneck visible at 1080p while keeping frame rates high.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance at 1080p?
A: The i3-12100F has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and boost of 4.30 GHz. At 1080p, the data shows FPS above 100 on all presets, but the scaling from Low to Ultra (194.3 to 108 FPS) suggests the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU has headroom that cannot be used.
Q: Does the RX 9070 XT’s memory configuration matter for this game?
A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. Control is not memory-bandwidth-bound at these settings, as evidenced by the smooth scaling from 1080p to 4K, but the 16 GB capacity ensures no frame drops from VRAM limits.
Q: How does this combo compare to the CPU’s nearest rivals in terms of bottleneck?
A: The i3-12100F’s average score (13,516) is nearly identical to the Threadripper PRO 3975WX (13,534), but that rival has far more cores. The benchmark data indicates that the i3’s single-thread strength (3DMark single-thread score of 893) is what matters for Control, not the core count.
Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking, and what does that imply?
A: The RX 9070 XT is at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, scoring 39,647 on average. This places it well above the median, but the combo rank of 428 out of 1,636 shows that the CPU prevents it from achieving top-tier status in this game.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data points to 1440p as the sweet spot for this combination. At 1440p Ultra, the combo delivers 77.7 FPS, which is smooth for an action-adventure title, while 1440p High provides 92.6 FPS with a modest visual step down. For players prioritizing frame rate, 1440p Low at 147.6 FPS is excellent, but it sacrifices too much visual fidelity for a game like Control, which relies on atmospheric details.
At 1080p, the recommendation is to avoid Low and Medium, as the CPU bottleneck becomes apparent — the jump from Medium (137.9 FPS) to High (122.7 FPS) is only 12.4%, but the visual improvement is significant. Ultra at 1080p (108 FPS) is playable, but the GPU is not the limiting factor. At 4K, the choice is clear: High gives 61.3 FPS, just above the 60 FPS threshold, while Ultra at 52 FPS is borderline. The data suggests that 4K High is the best playable option, as Medium (72.2 FPS) offers only marginal gains over High in terms of performance while reducing visual quality.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces 194.3 FPS at Low, 137.9 at Medium, 122.7 at High, and 108 at Ultra. The delta from Low to Ultra is 86.3 FPS, a 44.4% reduction. At 2560x1440, the numbers are 147.6 FPS at Low, 101.1 at Medium, 92.6 at High, and 77.7 at Ultra. The Low-to-Ultra drop is 69.9 FPS, or 47.4%. At 3840x2160, the results are 96.8 FPS at Low, 72.2 at Medium, 61.3 at High, and 52 at Ultra. The Low-to-Ultra difference is 44.8 FPS, a 46.3% reduction.
Comparing across resolutions at the same settings: Low goes from 194.3 (1080p) to 147.6 (1440p) to 96.8 (4K). Medium goes from 137.9 to 101.1 to 72.2. High goes from 122.7 to 92.6 to 61.3. Ultra goes from 108 to 77.7 to 52. The 1080p-to-4K percentage losses are 50.2% (Low), 47.6% (Medium), 50% (High), and 51.9% (Ultra). These figures are consistent, indicating that the GPU scales predictably with resolution, but the absolute frame rates at 1080p are capped by the CPU’s limitations.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the Alder Lake generation, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its L3 cache is 12 MB shared, and it supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the memory bus is dual-channel. The CPU’s benchmark scores show a strong single-thread capability: 3DMark single-thread score of 893, Cinebench R23 single-core of 1,681, and Geekbench single-core of 2,224. Multi-thread scores are lower relative to its rivals — Cinebench R23 multi-core is 11,912 — reflecting the quad-core design.
In Control, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. The game is not heavily multi-threaded, so the i3-12100F’s single-thread performance is adequate, but the 4-core limit shows up at 1080p where the GPU has spare capacity. The 3DMark 4-thread score of 2,859 and 8-thread score of 4,026 indicate that the processor can handle moderate loads, but the max-thread score (4,023) being nearly identical to the 8-thread score suggests that scaling flattens beyond 8 threads, which is expected for a 4-core part. The CPU’s TDP is 58 W, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700, with PCIe Gen 5 support for 16 lanes — enough for the RX 9070 XT’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The data shows that the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p, but at 4K, the GPU takes over, making this combo viable for high-resolution gaming despite the core count.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 96.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 72.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 61.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 52.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 147.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 101.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 92.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 77.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 194.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 137.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 122.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 108.0 |
Control with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RX 9070 XT + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii3-12100F + RX 9070 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.