Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
63
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 63 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 38 42 60
1440p QHD 46 54 62 90
1080p Full HD 64 73 83 115

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 60
3840x2160 Medium 42
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Ultra 36
2560x1440 Low 90
2560x1440 Medium 62
2560x1440 High 54
2560x1440 Ultra 46
1920x1080 Low 115
1920x1080 Medium 83
1920x1080 High 73
1920x1080 Ultra 64

Control with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT combination delivers a playable experience in Control, but the data clearly shows that the graphics card is the primary constraint on performance. The optimal balance of visual quality and frame rate is achieved at 1080p with High settings, yielding an average of 72.5 FPS. While the CPU has ample headroom, the GPU limits performance significantly at higher resolutions and settings, making it the definitive bottleneck in this pairing.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data indicates that the best experience for this specific CPU-GPU combo is found at 1920x1080 with the High preset. This configuration produces an average of 72.5 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The High preset represents the sweet spot because it provides a substantial visual upgrade over Medium (83.2 FPS) and Low (115 FPS) while maintaining a high frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the High preset yields an average of 54.2 FPS. This is still playable but falls below the 60 FPS mark, suggesting that users with 1440p displays should consider the Medium preset (62.2 FPS) for a smoother experience. The performance drop from 1080p High to 1440p High is 25.2%, indicating a significant GPU load increase.

The Ultra preset is only viable at 1080p, where it achieves 63.6 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra drops to 45.5 FPS, and at 4K it falls to 36.2 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. For users prioritizing visual fidelity over frame rate, 1080p Ultra is the only recommended option. The Low preset at 1080p achieves 115 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate displays, but the visual compromise is substantial.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture. It has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The CPU's benchmark scores demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 43695 and a single-core score of 6168.

In the context of Control, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with sufficient draw calls and physics calculations. The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in any of the measured configurations. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 115 FPS, which is the highest recorded average. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a ceiling on FPS regardless of resolution or settings.

The Ryzen 9 7900X sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 50556. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, scores 50598, a delta of -0.1%. This indicates that the 7900X is a high-end processor that provides more than enough performance for this game. The CPU's large 64 MB shared L3 cache likely contributes to its strong performance in games that require frequent data access.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is the clear bottleneck in this configuration. This GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. It has a base clock of 1605 MHz and a boost clock of 1905 MHz, with a game clock of 1755 MHz. The 5700 XT is based on the RDNA 1.0 architecture with 2560 shading units.

The GPU's performance is reflected in its benchmark scores, where it achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2134. It sits in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24731. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, scores 24763, a delta of -0.1%, placing the 5700 XT in a competitive mid-range position.

The measured FPS data shows that the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for the tested settings, but its compute power is limited. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 36.2, which is a 68.5% decrease from the 1080p Low result. The GPU's 9.754 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is simply not enough to handle the demands of Control at high resolutions with maximum settings.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ranks 1255 out of 1636 tested combos in Control. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the ranking, which is consistent with the GPU being the primary limiting factor. The CPU's strong performance is unable to compensate for the GPU's mid-range capabilities in this GPU-intensive title.

The ranking suggests that while this combo can run Control, it does so with significant compromises at higher settings. The 7900X is a top-tier CPU that would pair better with a more powerful GPU to achieve higher frame rates. The data shows that the system's performance is constrained by the GPU, and users seeking higher FPS would benefit from a GPU upgrade rather than a CPU upgrade.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?*

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the best resolution for this combo, with all settings presets achieving playable frame rates. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 72.5, while at 2560x1440 High, it drops to 54.2 FPS.

*Q: Can this system run Control at 4K?*

A: Yes, but only at lower settings. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 59.5, which is marginally playable. At 4K Medium, it drops to 42 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 36.2 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck. The Ryzen 9 7900X is a high-end processor that can handle the game's demands, but the RX 5700 XT limits performance, especially at higher resolutions. This is evident from the significant FPS drops when increasing resolution.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset achieves 115 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 63.6 FPS. This represents a 44.7% decrease in performance when moving from Low to Ultra settings.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 1255 out of 1636 tested combos in Control. This places it in the lower-middle range of all tested configurations.

Q: What is the frame rate at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 62.2. This is the highest frame rate achievable at 1440p while maintaining a balance between visual quality and performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution and settings increase. At 1920x1080, the system achieves its highest frame rates: 115 FPS at Low, 83.2 FPS at Medium, 72.5 FPS at High, and 63.6 FPS at Ultra.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly: 89.5 FPS at Low, 62.2 FPS at Medium, 54.2 FPS at High, and 45.5 FPS at Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings ranges from 22.2% at Low to 28.5% at Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles: 59.5 FPS at Low, 42 FPS at Medium, 37.8 FPS at High, and 36.2 FPS at Ultra. The 4K results show that only the Low preset achieves a frame rate near the 60 FPS threshold, while all other presets fall below 45 FPS.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling data reveals that this combo is heavily GPU-limited. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings results in a 25.2% FPS drop, from 72.5 to 54.2 FPS. Moving from 1440p to 4K at High settings results in a further 30.3% drop, from 54.2 to 37.8 FPS.

The scaling pattern is consistent across settings. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 115 at 1080p to 89.5 at 1440p (22.2% decrease), then to 59.5 at 4K (33.5% decrease). This indicates that the GPU is the limiting component, as the FPS drops are proportional to the increase in pixel count.

The CPU's strong performance ensures that it does not become a bottleneck even at lower resolutions. The data shows that the 7900X can deliver 115 FPS at 1080p Low, which is a high frame rate that many CPUs would struggle to achieve. This confirms that the RX 5700 XT is the sole constraint on performance, and users looking to improve frame rates at higher resolutions would need to upgrade the GPU to a more powerful model.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 170W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1905 MHz MHz
TDP 225 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 59.5
3840x2160 Medium 42.0
3840x2160 High 37.8
3840x2160 Ultra 36.2
2560x1440 Low 89.5
2560x1440 Medium 62.2
2560x1440 High 54.2
2560x1440 Ultra 45.5
1920x1080 Low 115.0
1920x1080 Medium 83.2
1920x1080 High 72.5
1920x1080 Ultra 63.6

Control with Ryzen 9 7900X + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RX 5700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 7900X + RX 5700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.