Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
68
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 68 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 40 45 63
1440p QHD 52 59 67 94
1080p Full HD 68 78 88 124

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 63
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Ultra 35
2560x1440 Low 94
2560x1440 Medium 67
2560x1440 High 59
2560x1440 Ultra 52
1920x1080 Low 124
1920x1080 Medium 88
1920x1080 High 78
1920x1080 Ultra 68

Control with AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis

Control, the 2019 action-adventure from Remedy, pushes this AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination in a way that clearly exposes the GPU as the primary bottleneck. The benchmark data shows a system that delivers very playable performance at 1080p, but which struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K, with the gap between settings presets widening considerably as resolution increases. The RTX 5050's 8 GB of VRAM and its position in the GPU percentile rankings are the defining factors here, while the Ryzen 9 5900X's substantial multi-threading capabilities go largely untapped in this title.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and definitive, indicating that the RTX 5050 is the limiting component in this pairing for Control. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 78 FPS at 1920x1080 to 59 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of roughly 24%, before plummeting to just 40 FPS at 3840x2160, which is nearly half of the 1080p performance. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario where the rendering resolution increasingly overwhelms the graphics processor's capabilities.

The data reveals that this bottleneck is not uniform across all settings. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 124 FPS at 1080p to 94 FPS at 1440p (a 24% drop) and then to 63 FPS at 4K (a 33% drop from 1440p). This suggests that even at the lowest graphical fidelity, the pixel throughput demand at 4K is too much for the RTX 5050 to handle efficiently. The 1440p results are particularly telling; they represent a middle ground where the system can still achieve acceptable performance, but the margin for error is thin. The average FPS at 1440p High is 59, which is right at the edge of smooth gameplay, and the 4K results show that this resolution is simply not viable for a consistent experience with this GPU.

These numbers demonstrate that the Ryzen 9 5900X is not the constraining factor. The CPU's benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16262 and a 3DMark max-threads score of 10075, indicate a processor with immense headroom for gaming workloads. The fact that performance scales so dramatically with resolution and settings confirms that the RTX 5050's rendering throughput, not the CPU's ability to feed it data, is what determines the final frame rate. The 4K results, with the average FPS dropping to between 35 and 63 depending on settings, strongly suggest that users should target 1080p or 1440p for a fluid experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Control with this processor and graphics card combination?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 is the safest choice for consistently high frame rates, with averages ranging from 68 FPS at Ultra to 124 FPS at Low. 2560x1440 is also viable, offering averages between 52 FPS at Ultra and 94 FPS at Low, but 3840x2160 should be avoided for demanding gameplay, as even Low settings only yield an average of 63 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 perform at 4K in Control?

A: The data indicates that 4K performance is marginal. The best average frame rate at 3840x2160 is 63 FPS on Low settings. Medium settings drop to an average of 45 FPS, and High settings fall to 40 FPS. Ultra settings produce an average of only 35 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth, responsive gameplay.

Q: How significant is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The jump from Low to Ultra at 1920x1080 results in a substantial 56 FPS difference (124 FPS vs 68 FPS). This indicates that the game's higher presets carry a significant rendering cost, and users can nearly double the frame rate by lowering the preset to Low.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X holding back the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in this game?

A: The data suggests the CPU is not the bottleneck. The consistent performance drops associated with increasing resolution and settings point to the GPU as the limiting factor. The Ryzen 9 5900X's high multi-core scores, such as 16262 in Cinebench R23, suggest it has ample processing power for this title.

Q: What kind of frame rate can I expect at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the benchmark data shows an average frame rate of 67 FPS, with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 77 FPS. This is a solid performance level for most displays and should provide a smooth experience.

Q: How does the combo's rank in this game compare to its overall component rankings?

A: The combo ranks 1756 out of 2888 tested combinations for this game. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the pack for Control, which is consistent with the RTX 5050's 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the CPU sits in the 87th percentile.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the decisive component in this pairing for Control, and its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus is a central factor in the performance ceiling observed. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s is a fixed resource, and the data suggests that at higher resolutions and settings, demand for this bandwidth outpaces supply, leading to the significant frame rate drops seen in the 4K benchmarks. The 8 GB capacity is also a potential limitation, as Control at 4K with high-detail textures can easily approach or exceed this limit, forcing the system to use slower memory pools and causing stutters or frame rate dips.

The GPU's clock speeds are modest, with a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz. These clocks, combined with the 2560 shading units, produce a theoretical FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS. This raw compute power is what drives the 1080p and 1440p results, where the card can maintain acceptable frame rates. However, as the pixel count increases, the TPU's fillrate and shading capacity become the limiting factor. The pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s are simply not sufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K, especially with the overhead of Ultra settings.

The performance data aligns with the GPU's benchmark scores. A Passmark G3D score of 17326 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 place the RTX 5050 in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (which scores 1.6% higher) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (which scores 1.6% lower), are all comparable in performance, confirming that this is a mid-range part. The fact that the RTX 5050's average benchmark score is 21035 against the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL's 21153 (a -0.6% delta) shows that it is not a high-end part, and its performance in Control is consistent with that positioning. The GPU is the clear performance arbiter, and its 8 GB memory configuration is a primary reason why the 4K results are so poor.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's capabilities across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system is at its most comfortable. Low settings produce an average of 124 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings yield 88 FPS (with a minimum of 75 and maximum of 101), High settings drop to 78 FPS, and Ultra settings still manage a respectable 68 FPS. The 1080p results show a clear, linear progression of performance cost as settings increase.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance takes a significant hit across the board. Low settings average 94 FPS, which remains very playable. Medium settings average 67 FPS (minimum 57, maximum 77), and High settings drop to 59 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 52 FPS, which is beginning to feel less smooth for a fast-paced action game. The delta between 1080p and 1440p is consistent, showing that the GPU is working much harder to fill the extra pixels.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain a consistent experience. The Low preset is the only one that breaks the 60 FPS barrier, averaging 63 FPS. Medium settings drop to an average of 45 FPS with a minimum of 38 FPS, indicating noticeable stuttering during intense scenes. High settings average 40 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at an average of 35 FPS. These 4K numbers are all below the ideal threshold for a fluid experience, and the 38 FPS minimum on Medium settings suggests that even that preset is not stable enough for reliable gameplay. The data shows that 1440p is the realistic ceiling for this combination in Control, with 1080p being the recommended resolution for the best balance of quality and performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination ranks 1756 out of 2888 tested combos in Control. This places it in the 39th percentile of all tested systems for this specific game, meaning that a majority of the other combinations tested were able to achieve higher frame rates. This ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's performance class, as the RTX 5050's percentile rank is 66th, while the CPU's percentile rank is much higher at 87th.

This discrepancy highlights a key aspect of the pairing. The Ryzen 9 5900X is a high-end desktop CPU with a strong multi-threaded performance profile, as evidenced by its 3DMark max-threads score of 10075 and Passmark multithread score of 39002. Yet, in a game like Control, this raw processing power is not the primary driver of frame rates. The combo's in-game rank is dragged down by the RTX 5050, which sits in the lower half of the performance spectrum when compared to all GPUs. The data indicates that the system is well-balanced for productivity tasks where the CPU is the main engine, but for gaming, this pairing is heavily skewed towards the CPU's capabilities, which are not fully utilized.

The fact that this combo is ranked 1756 out of 2888 is a clear signal that for Control specifically, it is an average-to-below-average gaming machine. The GPU's rivals, like the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT which scores 1.6% higher in synthetic benchmarks, would likely produce very similar results in this game. This ranking is not a reflection of a flawed system, but rather a clear indication of the performance tier this combination occupies. Users with this setup should expect mid-range gaming performance, not high-end or enthusiast-level frame rates at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience with this combination in Control is achieved at 1920x1080 with the High preset. This setting provides an average of 78 FPS, which is smooth and responsive for the game's action sequences, while still delivering a significant visual upgrade over Medium and Low settings. The 78 FPS average leaves enough headroom to avoid major dips, and it is a better balance than Ultra, which costs 10 FPS for what is often a marginal visual gain.

For users with 1440p monitors, the High preset is the best choice for a playable experience, yielding an average of 59 FPS. However, this is close to the edge of what is considered smooth. The Medium preset at 1440p offers a more comfortable average of 67 FPS, and the minimum of 57 FPS is still within an acceptable range. Given the data, opting for Medium at 1440p is the safer recommendation to ensure a consistent frame rate, as the High preset's 59 FPS average could drop into the low 50s during demanding scenes.

At 4K, none of the presets are recommended for a fully smooth experience. The Low preset's 63 FPS average is the only one that is technically playable, but it comes with a significant reduction in visual fidelity. The Medium preset's 38 FPS minimum is a strong indicator of stuttering, making it a poor choice. The benchmark data leads to a clear conclusion: the High preset at 1080p is the "sweet spot" for this hardware, offering the best combination of visual quality and performance. Users should prioritize 1080p to get the most out of the RTX 5050, as its 8 GB of VRAM and overall compute power are best utilized at this resolution.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4800 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2572 MHz MHz
TDP 130 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 63.0
3840x2160 Medium 45.0
3840x2160 High 40.0
3840x2160 Ultra 35.0
2560x1440 Low 94.0
2560x1440 Medium 67.0
2560x1440 High 59.0
2560x1440 Ultra 52.0
1920x1080 Low 124.0
1920x1080 Medium 88.0
1920x1080 High 78.0
1920x1080 Ultra 68.0

Control with Ryzen 9 5900X + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 5900X + RTX 5050

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.