Control

Control pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, a combination that delivers strong 1440p and 1080p performance in this Action Adventure title. The data shows a system that can handle high refresh rate gaming at mainstream resolutions, while 4K remains playable with settings adjustments. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, component roles, and how this specific pairing ranks among other tested configurations.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?

A: The sweet spot is 2560x1440, where High settings produce 109 FPS average and Low settings reach 172 FPS. At 1920x1080, the pairing exceeds 144 FPS on High settings, making it ideal for high refresh rate displays. 3840x2160 is playable but requires tuning, with High settings averaging 73 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU affect gameplay performance here?

A: The Ryzen 7 9850X3D features 8 cores and 16 threads with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz and 96 MB of shared L3 cache. Its benchmark percentile of 92 versus all CPUs indicates strong single-threaded performance, which is crucial for maintaining high frame rates and avoiding bottlenecks in CPU-bound scenes.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sufficient for 4K gaming in Control?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 3840x2160, Ultra settings average 64 FPS, while High settings improve to 73 FPS. Dropping to Medium yields 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS. Low settings reach 116 FPS, showing the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth handle the resolution, provided settings are adjusted.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The gap is substantial. At 2560x1440, Low settings average 172 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to 94 FPS. Medium settings sit at 122 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS. This represents a 78 FPS difference between the lowest and highest presets, giving users significant headroom to prioritize visual fidelity or frame rate.

Q: How does this combo rank against all other tested configurations?

A: The combination ranks 303rd out of 2888 tested combos for Control, placing it in the top 10.5% of all systems tested. This indicates a high-performing pairing that outperforms the vast majority of other CPU-GPU combinations in this specific game.

Q: What is the GPU's compute capability relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 31087, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 at 31206, a delta of -0.4%. It sits slightly below the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (31676, -1.9% delta), showing it competes with previous high-end cards despite its newer architecture.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is a desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock is 4.70 GHz, boosting up to 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. The processor includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is particularly beneficial for gaming workloads that rely on large data sets.

In Control, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. The benchmark data shows the CPU scores 3551 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 343 in single-core, while Cinebench R23 results are 22807 multi-core and 2228 single-core. The single-core performance is critical here, as Control's engine often scales with per-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 4704 and physics score of 4171 reinforce that this CPU can handle the game's simulation overhead without becoming a limiting factor at high frame rates.

The 96 MB L3 cache is a standout feature for gaming. It allows more of the game's working set to reside on-chip, reducing memory latency and improving frame pacing. The CPU's percentile ranking of 92 versus all CPUs places it well above average, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14900 with an average score of 58115, a delta of 0.5%. This indicates the 9850X3D sits in a performance tier that is competitive with top mainstream Intel offerings.

At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 228 FPS average, which is a scenario where CPU performance often dictates the ceiling. The data suggests the CPU can sustain such frame rates, as the measured FPS does not indicate a hard cap. However, at lower resolutions and settings, the CPU's single-threaded strength becomes more apparent, ensuring consistent frame delivery even in chaotic action sequences typical of this genre.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how settings impact performance across resolutions. For the best experience, the data suggests prioritizing 2560x1440 with High settings, which yields 109 FPS average. This balances visual quality with frame rate, offering a smooth experience without sacrificing the game's atmospheric detail. If higher frame rates are desired, Medium settings at 1440p deliver 122 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS, ensuring no noticeable dips below 100 FPS.

At 1920x1080, High settings produce 144 FPS average, which is excellent for 144 Hz monitors. Medium settings increase this to 162 FPS with a minimum of 137 FPS, while Ultra drops to 125 FPS. For competitive play or maximum smoothness, Low settings at 1080p reach 228 FPS, but this sacrifices visual fidelity. The data indicates that Medium at 1080p is the most balanced preset, offering high frame rates with only a slight visual compromise.

For 3840x2160, the data recommends Medium settings as the best compromise, averaging 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS. High settings at 73 FPS are playable but leave less headroom for demanding scenes. Ultra at 64 FPS is borderline, and users with variable refresh rate monitors may find it acceptable, but Medium provides a safer margin. Low settings at 4K reach 116 FPS, but the visual downgrade is significant for a game like Control, which relies on atmospheric effects.

Overall, the data suggests that 1440p High is the optimal configuration for this combo, as it delivers a high frame rate while maintaining the game's intended visuals. Users with 4K displays should use Medium settings to ensure consistent performance, while 1080p users can choose between High for quality or Medium for extra headroom.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ranks 303rd out of 2888 tested combos for Control. This places the pairing in the top 10.5% of all configurations tested, indicating a high level of performance relative to the broader database. This rank reflects the synergy between the CPU's strong single-threaded capabilities and the GPU's substantial rendering power.

The rank is particularly notable given the GPU's percentile of 76 versus all GPUs, which is above average but not top-tier. The CPU's percentile of 92 versus all CPUs is significantly higher, suggesting that the processor is a key contributor to this combination's strong ranking. The data implies that Control benefits from the CPU's large cache and high boost clock, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential without being starved of data.

Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing outperforms the vast majority, with only 302 configurations achieving higher performance. This is likely due to the combination of a high-end CPU with a capable GPU, which is well-suited for a game that is not extremely demanding on GPU resources but benefits from strong CPU performance. The ranking suggests that users of this combo can expect a top-tier experience in Control, with the ability to run high settings at high frame rates across most resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is based on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2340 MHz and boosts to 2610 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz for 21 Gbps effective speed. It has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

In Control, the GPU's role is to handle rendering, effects, and resolution scaling. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for this game, even at 3840x2160, where the data shows the combo can push beyond 60 FPS at Medium settings. The memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s ensures that texture streaming is not a bottleneck, particularly at high resolutions where larger textures are used. The GPU's FP32 performance of 44.10 TFLOPS is substantial, allowing for complex shader work and post-processing effects.

The GPU's benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5569, Geekbench OpenCL score of 199267, and Vulkan score of 53683. The PassMark G3D score is 31811, with a GPU compute score of 18372. These numbers indicate strong compute and rendering capabilities. The GPU's percentile of 76 versus all GPUs places it above the median, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA TITAN RTX with an average score of 31676, a delta of -1.9%, showing it is competitive with previous flagship cards.

The measured FPS data shows the GPU scaling well with resolution. At 1920x1080, it achieves 228 FPS on Low settings, indicating it is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, as evidenced by the drop to 64 FPS on Ultra settings. This scaling is typical for a GPU of this class, where 4K Ultra pushes the limits of the 44.10 TFLOPS compute performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers high frame rates across all settings. Low settings average 228 FPS, Medium averages 162 FPS with a minimum of 137 FPS and maximum of 186 FPS, High averages 144 FPS, and Ultra averages 125 FPS. This shows a clear progression where each settings tier reduces performance by roughly 20-40 FPS, with the gap between Low and Ultra being 103 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but with a larger drop from 1080p. Low settings average 172 FPS, Medium averages 122 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS and maximum of 141 FPS, High averages 109 FPS, and Ultra averages 94 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 78 FPS, indicating that the GPU is starting to become more of a factor at this resolution, but the combo still maintains playable frame rates on all presets.

At 3840x2160, the data shows a significant performance hit. Low settings average 116 FPS, Medium averages 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS and maximum of 95 FPS, High averages 73 FPS, and Ultra averages 64 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 52 FPS, but the absolute numbers are lower. Medium settings provide the best balance, with a minimum FPS of 70 ensuring consistent performance. High and Ultra are playable but may dip below 60 FPS in demanding scenes, although the data does not list minimum FPS for these presets.

The data shows that the combo is capable of exceeding 60 FPS at 4K with Medium settings or lower, and at 1440p it can hit 100+ FPS on High settings. At 1080p, it exceeds 140 FPS on all presets, making it suitable for high refresh rate gaming. The measured FPS values are consistent with the component specifications, with the CPU providing enough headroom for the GPU to perform at its best at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings.